122 research outputs found

    Principles of Physical Layer Security in Multiuser Wireless Networks: A Survey

    Full text link
    This paper provides a comprehensive review of the domain of physical layer security in multiuser wireless networks. The essential premise of physical-layer security is to enable the exchange of confidential messages over a wireless medium in the presence of unauthorized eavesdroppers without relying on higher-layer encryption. This can be achieved primarily in two ways: without the need for a secret key by intelligently designing transmit coding strategies, or by exploiting the wireless communication medium to develop secret keys over public channels. The survey begins with an overview of the foundations dating back to the pioneering work of Shannon and Wyner on information-theoretic security. We then describe the evolution of secure transmission strategies from point-to-point channels to multiple-antenna systems, followed by generalizations to multiuser broadcast, multiple-access, interference, and relay networks. Secret-key generation and establishment protocols based on physical layer mechanisms are subsequently covered. Approaches for secrecy based on channel coding design are then examined, along with a description of inter-disciplinary approaches based on game theory and stochastic geometry. The associated problem of physical-layer message authentication is also introduced briefly. The survey concludes with observations on potential research directions in this area.Comment: 23 pages, 10 figures, 303 refs. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1303.1609 by other authors. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 201

    A Survey on Wireless Security: Technical Challenges, Recent Advances and Future Trends

    Full text link
    This paper examines the security vulnerabilities and threats imposed by the inherent open nature of wireless communications and to devise efficient defense mechanisms for improving the wireless network security. We first summarize the security requirements of wireless networks, including their authenticity, confidentiality, integrity and availability issues. Next, a comprehensive overview of security attacks encountered in wireless networks is presented in view of the network protocol architecture, where the potential security threats are discussed at each protocol layer. We also provide a survey of the existing security protocols and algorithms that are adopted in the existing wireless network standards, such as the Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, WiMAX, and the long-term evolution (LTE) systems. Then, we discuss the state-of-the-art in physical-layer security, which is an emerging technique of securing the open communications environment against eavesdropping attacks at the physical layer. We also introduce the family of various jamming attacks and their counter-measures, including the constant jammer, intermittent jammer, reactive jammer, adaptive jammer and intelligent jammer. Additionally, we discuss the integration of physical-layer security into existing authentication and cryptography mechanisms for further securing wireless networks. Finally, some technical challenges which remain unresolved at the time of writing are summarized and the future trends in wireless security are discussed.Comment: 36 pages. Accepted to Appear in Proceedings of the IEEE, 201

    ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ์žฌ๋ฐ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ค‘๊ณ„ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ๋ณด์•ˆ ํ†ต์‹ ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐ ํ• ๋‹น ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ •๋ณด๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2019. 2. ์ด์žฌํ™.Physical layer security is a promising technology in the upcoming fifth generation (5G) wireless communication because the wireless communication is vulnerable to eavesdrop and it is complex to encrypt a data signal. In physical layer security, secure transmission is satisfied by using the physical characteristics of the wireless channel. Cooperative jamming is one of the efficient techniques to enhance secrecy performance in physical layer security. In cooperative jamming, a cooperating node transmits a jamming signal to interfere the eavesdropper. However, this jamming signal effects not only the eavesdropper but also the destination, which degrades the secrecy performance and causes waste of transmit power. It means the jamming signal transmission needs to be designed properly with optimization and power allocation to enhance security. The dissertation consists of two main results. First, we investigate a two-hop relay network consists of a source, an AF relay, a destination, and an eavesdropper. In this network, cooperative jamming is utilized in which the destination and the source transmit jamming signals in phase 1 and 2, respectively. At the destination, its own jamming signal transmitted in phase 1 is perfectly cancelled, and the jamming signal from the source has negligible strength due to the weak channel condition from the source to destination. We propose an optimal source power allocation for the network to enhance the secrecy performance based on the channel knowledge available at the source. Simulation results show that the proposed source power allocation scheme achieves higher secrecy rate and lower secrecy outage probability than the fixed power allocation schemes. Second, we investigate a two-hop relay network consists of a source, multiple AF relays, a destination, and an eavesdropper. In this network, one relay is selected out of the relays to forwards the data signals. Also, cooperative jamming is utilized in which the destination and the source transmit jamming signals in phase 1 and 2, respectively. We propose power allocation and relay selection scheme to minimize secrecy outage probability with the total power constraint and the power constraints for each phases, respectively. In total power constraint case, power allocation and relay selection problem is formulated and it is divided into a master problem and a subproblem by using the primal decomposition method. Simulation results show that the proposed scheme achieves lower secrecy outage probability than the conventional jamming power allocation scheme as well as without jamming scheme.๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๊ณ„์ธต ๋ณด์•ˆ์€ ๋ฌด์„ ํ†ต์‹ ์˜ ๋ณด์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ทจ์•ฝ์ ๊ณผ ์•”ํ˜ธํ™”์˜ ๋ณต์žก์„ฑ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ํŠน์ง•์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ, 5์„ธ๋Œ€(5G) ์ด๋™ํ†ต์‹ ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๊ณ„์ธต ๋ณด์•ˆ์€ ๋ฌด์„  ์ฑ„๋„์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์•ˆ ํ†ต์‹ ์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ์žฌ๋ฐ(cooperative jamming)์€ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๊ณ„์ธต ๋ณด์•ˆ์—์„œ์˜ ๋ณด์•ˆ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋กœ, ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ๋…ธ๋“œ๊ฐ€ ์žฌ๋ฐ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ์ „์†กํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋„์ฒญ์ž๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ณด์•ˆ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์žฌ๋ฐ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋Š” ๋„์ฒญ์ž ๋ฟ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์ˆ˜์‹ ๋‹จ ์—ญ์‹œ ๋ฐฉํ•ดํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ์žฌ๋ฐ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์ „์†ก์€ ๋ณด์•ˆ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ์ง€์žฅ์„ ์ฃผ๊ณ  ์ „๋ ฅ์„ ๋‚ญ๋น„ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณด์•ˆ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์žฌ๋ฐ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์˜ ์ „๋ ฅ ํ• ๋‹น ๋ฐ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์š”ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์†ก์‹ ๋‹จ, ์ฆํญ ํ›„ ์žฌ์ „์†ก ์ค‘๊ณ„๊ธฐ, ์ˆ˜์‹ ๋‹จ ๋ฐ ๋„์ฒญ์ž๊ฐ€ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ์ค‘๊ณ„ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋•Œ ์ˆ˜์‹ ๋‹จ ๋ฐ ์†ก์‹ ๋‹จ์ด ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ์žฌ๋ฐ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ฐ ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ํŽ˜์ด์ฆˆ์—์„œ ์žฌ๋ฐ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ์ „์†กํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์‹ ๋‹จ์ด ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ํŽ˜์ด์ฆˆ์— ์ „์†กํ•œ ์žฌ๋ฐ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋Š” ์ค‘๊ณ„๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ฆํญ๋˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ˆ˜์‹ ๋‹จ์ด ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์†ก์‹ ๋‹จ์˜ ์žฌ๋ฐ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋Š” ์†ก์‹ ๋‹จ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์‹ ๋‹จ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ฑ„๋„์ด ์•ฝํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ˆ˜์‹ ๋‹จ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋•Œ ๋ณธ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์—์„œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ๋ณด์•ˆ ์ „์†ก๋ฅ (secrecy rate) ๋ฐ ๋ณด์•ˆ ๋ถˆ๋Šฅ ํ™•๋ฅ (secrecy outage probability)์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ์†ก์‹ ๋‹จ์˜ ๊ฐ ํŽ˜์ด์ฆˆ ๋ณ„ ์ „์†ก ์ „๋ ฅ์„ ์†ก์‹ ๋‹จ์ด ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ฑ„๋„ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์ „๋ ฅ ํ• ๋‹น ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ณ ์ • ์ „๋ ฅ ํ• ๋‹น ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋†’์€ ๋ณด์•ˆ ์ „์†ก๋ฅ ๊ณผ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋ณด์•ˆ ๋ถˆ๋Šฅ ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์†ก์‹ ๋‹จ, ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ์ฆํญ ํ›„ ์žฌ์ „์†ก ์ค‘๊ณ„๊ธฐ๋“ค, ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์ˆ˜์‹ ๋‹จ ๋ฐ ๋„์ฒญ์ž๊ฐ€ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ์ค‘๊ณ„ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ์ค‘๊ณ„๊ธฐ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์ค‘๊ณ„๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์„ ํƒ๋˜์–ด ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ์ „์†กํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉฐ, ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ์žฌ๋ฐ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์‹ ๋‹จ ๋ฐ ์†ก์‹ ๋‹จ์ด ์žฌ๋ฐ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ์ „์†กํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋•Œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ๋ณด์•ˆ ๋ถˆ๋Šฅ ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ค‘๊ณ„๊ธฐ ์„ ํƒ ๋ฐ ์ „๋ ฅ ํ• ๋‹น ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ „๋ ฅ ์ œํ•œ์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์ „์ฒด ์ „๋ ฅ์ด ์ œํ•œ๋œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ค‘๊ณ„๊ธฐ ์„ ํƒ ๋ฐ ์ „๋ ฅ ํ• ๋‹น ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ’€๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ถ€๋ฌธ์ œ(subproblem) ๋กœ ๋ถ„ํ• ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ๋ฐ ์žฌ๋ฐ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ์ „์†กํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋ณด์•ˆ ๋ถˆ๋Šฅ ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•œ๋‹ค.Abstract i 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background and Related Work 2 1.1.1 Physical Layer Security 2 1.1.2 Cooperative Jamming 3 1.2 Outline of Dissertation 5 1.3 Notations 6 2 Source Power Allocation for Cooperative Jamming in Amplify-and- Forward Relay Network with Eavesdropper 9 2.1 System Model 10 2.2 Source Power Allocation 16 2.2.1 Full CSI for All Links 16 2.2.2 Full CSI for Desired Links only 18 2.3 Simulation Results 23 2.3.1 Identical Channel Condition 23 2.3.2 Non-identical Channel Condition 32 2.3.3 Multiple Antenna Eavesdropper 50 2.4 Summary 50 3 Power Allocation and Relay Selection for Cooperative Jamming in AF Relay Network with Multiple Relays and an Eavesdropper 53 3.1 System Model 55 3.2 Secrecy Outage Probability Analysis 61 3.3 Power Allocation and Relay Selection 66 3.3.1 Total Power Constraint 66 3.3.2 Power Constraints for Each Phases 68 3.4 Numerical Results 70 3.4.1 Multiple Antenna Eavesdropper 86 3.5 Extension to Multiple Relay Selection 86 3.6 Summary 88 4 Conclusion 89 4.1 Summary 89 4.2 Future Works 90 A Obtainment of Optimal Values of alpha in R1 and R2 92 Bibliography 95 Korean Abstract 104Docto
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore