14 research outputs found

    A survey on gain-scheduled control and filtering for parameter-varying systems

    Get PDF
    Copyright ยฉ 2014 Guoliang Wei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.This paper presents an overview of the recent developments in the gain-scheduled control and filtering problems for the parameter-varying systems. First of all, we recall several important algorithms suitable for gain-scheduling method including gain-scheduled proportional-integral derivative (PID) control, H 2, H โˆž and mixed H 2 / H โˆž gain-scheduling methods as well as fuzzy gain-scheduling techniques. Secondly, various important parameter-varying system models are reviewed, for which gain-scheduled control and filtering issues are usually dealt with. In particular, in view of the randomly occurring phenomena with time-varying probability distributions, some results of our recent work based on the probability-dependent gain-scheduling methods are reviewed. Furthermore, some latest progress in this area is discussed. Finally, conclusions are drawn and several potential future research directions are outlined.The National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61074016, 61374039, 61304010, and 61329301; the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China under Grant BK20130766; the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning; the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University under Grant NCET-11-1051, the Leverhulme Trust of the U.K., the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation of Germany

    A new approach to applying discrete sliding mode control to 2D systems

    Full text link
    Sliding mode control has been applied previously to a specific form of 2D systems (Roesser model). In this paper a new approach (ID vectorial form) is introduced for this problem. Using ID form to represent 2D systems can be used as an alternative strategy to reduce the inherent complexity of 2D systems and their applications. Unlike Wave Advanced Model (WAM) form (proposed by Porter and Aravena), the suggested ID vectorial form, in this paper, has invariable dimension and consequently can be converted to regular form for sliding mode control (SMC). In this paper, the first Fornasini and Marchesini (FM) model of 2D systems which is a second order recursive form is considered. Meantime, the suggested method can be simply deployed to other first or second order 2D models. ยฉ2013 IEEE

    Geometric Fault Detection and Isolation of Infinite Dimensional Systems

    Get PDF
    A broad class of dynamical systems from chemical processes to flexible mechanical structures, heat transfer and compression processes in gas turbine engines are represented by a set of partial differential equations (PDE). These systems are known as infinite dimensional (Inf-D) systems. Most of Inf-D systems, including PDEs and time-delayed systems can be represented by a differential equation in an appropriate Hilbert space. These Hilbert spaces are essentially Inf-D vector spaces, and therefore, they are utilized to represent Inf-D dynamical systems. Inf-D systems have been investigated by invoking two schemes, namely approximate and exact methods. Both approaches extend the control theory of ordinary differential equation (ODE) systems to Inf-D systems, however by utilizing two different methodologies. In the former approach, one needs to first approximate the original Inf-D system by an ODE system (e.g. by using finite element or finite difference methods) and then apply the established control theory of ODEs to the approximated model. On the other hand, in the exact approach, one investigates the Inf-D system without using any approximation. In other words, one first represents the system as an Inf-D system and then investigates it in the corresponding Inf-D Hilbert space by extending and generalizing the available results of finite-dimensional (Fin-D) control theory. It is well-known that one of the challenging issues in control theory is development of algorithms such that the controlled system can maintain the required performance even in presence of faults. In the literature, this property is known as fault tolerant control. The fault detection and isolation (FDI) analysis is the first step in order to achieve this goal. For Inf-D systems, the currently available results on the FDI problem are quite limited and restricted. This thesis is mainly concerned with the FDI problem of the linear Inf-D systems by using both approximate and exact approaches based on the geometric control theory of Fin-D and Inf-D systems. This thesis addresses this problem by developing a geometric FDI framework for Inf-D systems. Moreover, we implement and demonstrate a methodology for applying our results to mathematical models of a heat transfer and a two-component reaction-diffusion processes. In this thesis, we first investigate the development of an FDI scheme for discrete-time multi-dimensional (nD) systems that represent approximate models for Inf-D systems. The basic invariant subspaces including unobservable and unobservability subspaces of one-dimensional (1D) systems are extended to nD models. Sufficient conditions for solvability of the FDI problem are provided, where an LMI-based approach is also derived for the observer design. The capability of our proposed FDI methodology is demonstrated through numerical simulation results to an approximation of a hyperbolic partial differential equation system of a heat exchanger that is represented as a two-dimensional (2D) system. In the second part, an FDI methodology for the Riesz spectral (RS) system is investigated. RS systems represent a large class of parabolic and hyperbolic PDE in Inf-D systems framework. This part is mainly concerned with the equivalence of different types of invariant subspaces as defined for RS systems. Necessary and sufficient conditions for solvability of the FDI problem are developed. Moreover, for a subclass of RS systems, we first provide algorithms (for computing the invariant subspaces) that converge in a finite and known number of steps and then derive the necessary and sufficient conditions for solvability of the FDI problem. Finally, by generalizing the results that are developed for RS systems necessary and sufficient conditions for solvability of the FDI problem in a general Inf-D system are derived. Particularly, we first address invariant subspaces of Fin-D systems from a new point of view by invoking resolvent operators. This approach enables one to extend the previous Fin-D results to Inf-D systems. Particularly, necessary and sufficient conditions for equivalence of various types of conditioned and controlled invariant subspaces of Inf-D systems are obtained. Duality properties of Inf-D systems are then investigated. By introducing unobservability subspaces for Inf-D systems the FDI problem is formally formulated, and necessary and sufficient conditions for solvability of the FDI problem are provided

    Relaxing Fundamental Assumptions in Iterative Learning Control

    Full text link
    Iterative learning control (ILC) is perhaps best decribed as an open loop feedforward control technique where the feedforward signal is learned through repetition of a single task. As the name suggests, given a dynamic system operating on a finite time horizon with the same desired trajectory, ILC aims to iteratively construct the inverse image (or its approximation) of the desired trajectory to improve transient tracking. In the literature, ILC is often interpreted as feedback control in the iteration domain due to the fact that learning controllers use information from past trials to drive the tracking error towards zero. However, despite the significant body of literature and powerful features, ILC is yet to reach widespread adoption by the control community, due to several assumptions that restrict its generality when compared to feedback control. In this dissertation, we relax some of these assumptions, mainly the fundamental invariance assumption, and move from the idea of learning through repetition to two dimensional systems, specifically repetitive processes, that appear in the modeling of engineering applications such as additive manufacturing, and sketch out future research directions for increased practicality: We develop an L1 adaptive feedback control based ILC architecture for increased robustness, fast convergence, and high performance under time varying uncertainties and disturbances. Simulation studies of the behavior of this combined L1-ILC scheme under iteration varying uncertainties lead us to the robust stability analysis of iteration varying systems, where we show that these systems are guaranteed to be stable when the ILC update laws are designed to be robust, which can be done using existing methods from the literature. As a next step to the signal space approach adopted in the analysis of iteration varying systems, we shift the focus of our work to repetitive processes, and show that the exponential stability of a nonlinear repetitive system is equivalent to that of its linearization, and consequently uniform stability of the corresponding state space matrix.PhDElectrical Engineering: SystemsUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133232/1/altin_1.pd

    Relationships between digital signal processing and control and estimation theory

    Get PDF
    Bibliography: leaves 83-97.NASA Grant NGL-22-009-124 and NSF Grant GK-41647.Alan S. Willsky

    Sliding Mode Control

    Get PDF
    The main objective of this monograph is to present a broad range of well worked out, recent application studies as well as theoretical contributions in the field of sliding mode control system analysis and design. The contributions presented here include new theoretical developments as well as successful applications of variable structure controllers primarily in the field of power electronics, electric drives and motion steering systems. They enrich the current state of the art, and motivate and encourage new ideas and solutions in the sliding mode control area

    Iterative Learning Control design for uncertain and time-windowed systems

    Get PDF
    Iterative Learning Control (ILC) is a control strategy capable of dramatically increasing the performance of systems that perform batch repetitive tasks. This performance improvement is achieved by iteratively updating the command signal, using measured error data from previous trials, i.e., by learning from past experience. This thesis deals with ILC for time-windowed and uncertain systems. With the term "time-windowed systems", we mean systems in which actuation and measurement time intervals differ. With "uncertain systems", we refer to systems whose behavior is represented by incomplete or inaccurate models. To study the ILC design issues for time-windowed systems, we consider the task of residual vibration suppression in point-to-point motion problems. In this application, time windows are used to modify the original system to comply with the task. With the properties of the time-windowed system resulting in nonconverging behavior of the original ILC controlled system, we introduce a novel ILC design framework in which convergence can be achieved. Additionally, this framework reveals new design freedom in ILC for point-to-point motion problems, which is unknown in "standard" ILC. Theoretical results concerning the problem formulation and control design for these systems are supported by experimental results on a SISO and MIMO flexible structure. The analysis and design results of ILC for time-windowed systems are subsequently extended to the whole class of linear systems whose input and output are filtered with basis functions (which include time windows). Analysis and design theory of ILC for this class of systems reveals how different ILC objectives can be reached by design of separate parts of the ILC controller. Our research on ILC for uncertain systems is divided into two parts. In the first part, we formulate an approach to analyze the robustness properties of existing ILC controllers, using well developed ยต theory. To exemplify our findings, we analyze the robustness properties of linear quadratic (LQ) norm optimal ILC controllers. Moreover, we show that the approach is applicable to the class of linear trial invariant ILC controlled systems with basis functions. In the second part, we present a finite time interval robust ILC control strategy that is robust against model uncertainty as given by an additive uncertainty model. For that, we exploit H1 control theory, however, modified such that the controller is not restricted to be causal and operates on a finite time interval. Furthermore, we optimize the robust controller so as to optimize performance while remaining robustly monotonically convergent. By means of experiments on a SISO flexible system, we show that this control strategy can indeed outperform LQ norm optimal ILC and causal robust ILC control strategies

    Structure-Preserving Model Reduction of Physical Network Systems

    Get PDF
    This paper considers physical network systems where the energy storage is naturally associated to the nodes of the graph, while the edges of the graph correspond to static couplings. The first sections deal with the linear case, covering examples such as mass-damper and hydraulic systems, which have a structure that is similar to symmetric consensus dynamics. The last section is concerned with a specific class of nonlinear physical network systems; namely detailed-balanced chemical reaction networks governed by mass action kinetics. In both cases, linear and nonlinear, the structure of the dynamics is similar, and is based on a weighted Laplacian matrix, together with an energy function capturing the energy storage at the nodes. We discuss two methods for structure-preserving model reduction. The first one is clustering; aggregating the nodes of the underlying graph to obtain a reduced graph. The second approach is based on neglecting the energy storage at some of the nodes, and subsequently eliminating those nodes (called Kron reduction).</p

    ํŠน์ • ์ ์˜ ์ถ”์ ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ˆ์ธก์ œ์–ด๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•™์Šต์ œ์–ด ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ํ™”ํ•™์ƒ๋ฌผ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2017. 2. ์ด์ข…๋ฏผ.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ œ์•ฝ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ํšŒ๋ถ„์‹ ๊ณต์ •์˜ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•™์Šต์ œ์–ด(Iterative learning control, ILC)์™€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ˆ์ธก์ œ์–ด(Model predictive control, MPC)๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•™์Šต ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ˆ์ธก์ œ์–ด(Iterative learning model predictive control, ILMPC)๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ILC๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ๋”๋ผ๋„ ์ด์ „ ํšŒ๋ถ„์˜ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ํ•™์Šตํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ถœ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ถค์ ์— ์ˆ˜๋ ด์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐœ๋ฃจํ”„ ์ œ์–ด์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์™ธ๋ž€์„ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋‹ค. MPC๋Š” ์ด์ „ ํšŒ๋ถ„์˜ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ชจ๋“  ํšŒ๋ถ„์—์„œ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜์กดํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ILC์™€ MPC์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ์žฅ์ ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ILMPC๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งŽ์€ ํšŒ๋ถ„์‹ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ณต ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ์ถœ๋ ฅ์€ ๋ชจ๋“  ์‹œ๊ฐ„์—์„œ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ถค์ ์„ ์ถ”์ ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ ์—๋งŒ ์ˆ˜๋ ดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ILMPC ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ ์„ ์ง€๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ถค์ ์„ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์ด ํ•„์š” ์—†๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ ๋Œ€์  ์ถ”์ , ๋ฐ˜๋ณต ํ•™์Šต, ์ œ์•ฝ์กฐ๊ฑด, ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์™ธ๋ž€ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์˜ˆ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค.In this thesis, we study an iterative learning control (ILC) technique combined with model predictive control (MPC), called the iterative learning model predictive control (ILMPC), for constrained multivariable control of batch processes. Although the general ILC makes the outputs converge to reference trajectories under model uncertainty, it uses open-loop control within a batchthus, it cannot reject real-time disturbances. The MPC algorithm shows identical performance for all batches, and it highly depends on model quality because it does not use previous batch information. We integrate the advantages of the two algorithms. In many batch or repetitive processes, the output does not need to track all points of a reference trajectory. We propose a novel ILMPC method which can only consider the desired reference points, not an entire reference trajectory. It does not require to generate a reference trajectory which passes through the specific desired points. Numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the performances of the suggested approach on point-to-point tracking, iterative learning, constraints handling, and real-time disturbance rejection.1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Literature Review 4 1.2.1 Iterative Learning Control 4 1.2.2 Iterative Learning Control Combined with Model Predictive Control 15 1.2.3 Iterative Learning Control for Point-to-Point Tracking 17 1.3 Major Contributions of This Thesis 18 1.4 Outline of This Thesis 19 2. Iterative Learning Control Combined with Model Predictive Control 22 2.1 Introduction 22 2.2 Prediction Model for Iterative Learning Model Predictive Control 25 2.2.1 Incremental State-Space Model 25 2.2.2 Prediction Model 30 2.3 Iterative Learning Model Predictive Controller 34 2.3.1 Unconstrained ILMPC 34 2.3.2 Constrained ILMPC 35 2.3.3 Convergence Property 37 2.3.4 Extension for Disturbance Model 42 2.4 Numerical Illustrations 44 2.4.1 (Case 1) Unconstrained and Constrained Linear SISO System 45 2.4.2 (Case 2) Constrained Linear MIMO System 49 2.4.3 (Case 3) Nonlinear Batch Reactor 53 2.5 Conclusion 59 3. Iterative Learning Control Combined with Model Predictive Control for Non-Zero Convergence 60 3.1 Iterative Learning Model Predictive Controller for Nonzero Convergence 60 3.2 Convergence Analysis 63 3.2.1 Convergence Analysis for an Input Trajectory 63 3.2.2 Convergence Analysis for an Output Error 65 3.3 Illustrative Example 71 3.4 Conclusions 75 4. Iterative Learning Control Combined with Model Predictive Control for Tracking Specific Points 77 4.1 Introduction 77 4.2 Point-to-Point Iterative Learning Model Predictive Control 79 4.2.1 Extraction Matrix Formulation 79 4.2.2 Constrained PTP ILMPC 82 4.2.3 Iterative Learning Observer 86 4.3 Convergence Analysis 89 4.3.1 Convergence of Input Trajectory 89 4.3.2 Convergence of Error 95 4.4 Numerical Examples 98 4.4.1 Example 1 (Linear SISO System with Disturbance) 98 4.4.2 Example 2 (Linear SISO System) 104 4.4.3 Example 3 (Comparison between the Proposed PTP ILMPC and PTP ILC) 107 4.4.4 Example 4 (Nonlinear Semi-Batch Reactor) 113 4.5 Conclusion 119 5. Stochastic Iterative Learning Control for Batch-varying Reference Trajectory 120 5.1 Introduction 121 5.2 ILC for Batch-Varying Reference Trajectories 123 5.2.1 Convergence Property for ILC with Batch-Varying Reference Trajectories 123 5.2.2 Iterative Learning Identification 126 5.2.3 Deterministic ILC Controller for Batch-Varying Reference Trajectories 129 5.3 ILC for LTI Stochastic System with Batch-Varying Reference Trajectories 132 5.3.1 Approach1: Batch-Domain Kalman Filter-Based Approach 133 5.3.2 Approach2: Time-Domain Kalman Filter-Based Approach 137 5.4 Numerical Examples 141 5.4.1 Example 1 (Random Reference Trajectories 141 5.4.2 Example 2 (Particular Types of Reference Trajectories 149 5.5 Conclusion 151 6. Conclusions and Future Works 156 6.1 Conclusions 156 6.2 Future work 157 Bibliography 158 ์ดˆ๋ก 170Docto
    corecore