Producing Trustworthy Hardware Using Untrusted Components, Personnel and Resources

Computer security is a full-system property, and attackers will always go after the weakest link in a system. In modern computer systems, the hardware supply chain is an obvious and vulnerable point of attack. The ever-increasing complexity of hardware systems, along with the globalization of the hardware supply chain, has made it unreasonable to trust hardware. Hardware-based attacks, known as backdoors, are easy to implement and can undermine the security of systems built on top of compromised hardware. Operating systems and other software can only be secure if they can trust the underlying hardware systems. The full supply chain for creating hardware includes multiple processes, which are often addressed in disparate threads of research, but which we consider as one unified process. On the front-end side, there is the soft design of hardware, along with validation and synthesis, to ultimately create a netlist, the document that defines the physical layout of hardware. On the back-end side, there is a physical fabrication process, where a chip is produced at a foundry from a supplied netlist, followed in some cases by post-fabrication testing. Producing a trustworthy chip means securing the process from the early design stages through to the post-fabrication tests. We propose, implement and analyze a series of methods for making the hardware supply chain resilient against a wide array of known and possible attacks. These methods allow for the design and fabrication of hardware using untrustworthy personnel, designs, tools and resources, while protecting the final product from large classes of attacks, some known previously and some discovered and taxonomized in this work. The overarching idea in this work is to take a full-process view of the hardware supply chain. We begin by securing the hardware design and synthesis processes uses a defense-in-depth approach. We combine this work with foundry-side techniques to prevent malicious modifications and counterfeiting, and finally apply novel attestation techniques to ensure that hardware is trustworthy when it reaches users. For our design-side security approach, we use defense-in-depth because in practice, any security method can potentially subverted, and defense-in-depth is the best way to handle that assumption. Our approach involves three independent steps. The first is a functional analysis tool (called FANCI), applied statically to designs during the coding and validation stages to remove any malicious circuits. The second step is to include physical security circuits that operate at runtime. These circuits, which we call trigger obfuscation circuits, scramble data at the microarchitectural level so that any hardware backdoors remaining in the design cannot be triggered at runtime. The third and final step is to include a runtime monitoring system that detects any backdoor payloads that might have been achieved despite the previous two steps. We design two different versions of this monitoring system. The first, TrustNet, is extremely lightweight and protects against an important class of attacks called emitter backdoors. The second, DataWatch, is slightly more heavyweight (though still efficient and low overhead) that can catch a wider variety of attacks and can be adapted to protect against nearly any type of digital payload. We taxonomize the types of attacks that are possible against each of the three steps of our defense-in-depth system and show that each defense provides strong coverage with low (or negligible) overheads to performance, area and power consumption. For our foundry-side security approach, we develop the first foundry-side defense system that is aware of design-side security. We create a power-based side-channel, called a beacon. This beacon is essentially a benign backdoor. It can be turned on by a special key (not provided to the foundry), allowing for security attestation during post-fabrication testing. By designing this beacon into the design itself, the beacon requires neither keys nor storage, and as such exists in the final chip purely by virtue of existing in the netlist. We further obfuscate the netlist itself, rendering the task of reverse engineering the beacon (for a foundry-side adversary) intractable. Both the inclusion of the beacon and the obfuscation process add little to area and power costs and have no impact on performance. All together, these methods provide a foundation on which hardware security can be developed and enhanced. They are low overhead and practical, making them suitable for inclusion in next generation hardware. Moving forward, the criticality of having trustworthy hardware can only increase. Ensuring that the hardware supply chain can be trusted in the face of sophisticated adversaries is vital. Both hardware design and hardware fabrication are increasingly international processes, and we believe continuing with this unified approach is the correct path for future research. In order for companies and governments to place trust in mission-critical hardware, it is necessary for hardware to be certified as secure and trustworthy. The methods we propose can be the first steps toward making this certification a reality

Moving target defense for securing smart grid communications: Architectural design, implementation and evaluation

Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) communications are often subjected to various kinds of sophisticated cyber-attacks which can have a serious impact on the Critical Infrastructure such as the power grid. Most of the time, the success of the attack is based on the static characteristics of the system, thereby enabling an easier profiling of the target system(s) by the adversary and consequently exploiting their limited resources. In this thesis, a novel approach to mitigate such static vulnerabilities is proposed by implementing a Moving Target Defense (MTD) strategy in a power grid SCADA environment, which leverages the existing communication network with an end-to-end IP Hopping technique among the trusted peer devices. This offers a proactive L3 layer network defense, minimizing IP-specific threats and thwarting worm propagation, APTs, etc., which utilize the cyber kill chain for attacking the system through the SCADA network. The main contribution of this thesis is to show how MTD concepts provide proactive defense against targeted cyber-attacks, and a dynamic attack surface to adversaries without compromising the availability of a SCADA system. Specifically, the thesis presents a brief overview of the different type of MTD designs, the proposed MTD architecture and its implementation with IP hopping technique over a Control Center–Substation network link along with a 3-way handshake protocol for synchronization on the Iowa State’s Power Cyber testbed. The thesis further investigates the delay and throughput characteristics of the entire system with and without the MTD to choose the best hopping rate for the given link. It also includes additional contributions for making the testbed scenarios more realistic to real world scenarios with multi-hop, multi-path WAN. Using that and studying a specific attack model, the thesis analyses the best ranges of IP address for different hopping rate and different number of interfaces. Finally, the thesis describes two case studies to explore and identify potential weaknesses of the proposed mechanism, and also experimentally validate the proposed mitigation alterations to resolve the discovered vulnerabilities. As part of future work, we plan to extend this work by optimizing the MTD algorithm to be more resilient by incorporating other techniques like network port mutation to further increase the attack complexity and cost

Wink: Deniable Secure Messaging

End-to-end encrypted (E2EE) messaging is an essential first step towards combating increasingly privacy-intrusive laws. Unfortunately, it is vulnerable to compelled key disclosure -- law-mandated, coerced, or simply by device compromise. This work introduces Wink, the first plausibly-deniable messaging system protecting message confidentiality even when users are coerced to hand over keys/passwords. Wink can surreptitiously inject hidden messages in the standard random coins (e.g., salt, IVs) used by existing E2EE protocols. It does so as part of legitimate secure cryptographic functionality deployed inside widely-available trusted execution environments (TEEs) such as TrustZone. This provides a powerful mechanism for hidden untraceable communication using virtually unchanged unsuspecting existing E2EE messaging apps, as well as strong plausible deniability. Wink has been demonstrated with multiple existing E2EE applications (including Telegram and Signal) with minimal (external) instrumentation, negligible overheads, and crucially without changing on-wire message formats

Security of Ubiquitous Computing Systems

The chapters in this open access book arise out of the EU Cost Action project Cryptacus, the objective of which was to improve and adapt existent cryptanalysis methodologies and tools to the ubiquitous computing framework. The cryptanalysis implemented lies along four axes: cryptographic models, cryptanalysis of building blocks, hardware and software security engineering, and security assessment of real-world systems. The authors are top-class researchers in security and cryptography, and the contributions are of value to researchers and practitioners in these domains. This book is open access under a CC BY license

Security of Ubiquitous Computing Systems

The chapters in this open access book arise out of the EU Cost Action project Cryptacus, the objective of which was to improve and adapt existent cryptanalysis methodologies and tools to the ubiquitous computing framework. The cryptanalysis implemented lies along four axes: cryptographic models, cryptanalysis of building blocks, hardware and software security engineering, and security assessment of real-world systems. The authors are top-class researchers in security and cryptography, and the contributions are of value to researchers and practitioners in these domains. This book is open access under a CC BY license

Subliminal Hash Channels

Due to their nature, subliminal channels are mostly regarded as being malicious, but due to recent legislation efforts users\u27 perception might change. Such channels can be used to subvert digital signature protocols without degrading the security of the underlying primitive. Thus, it is natural to find countermeasures and devise subliminal-free signatures. In this paper we discuss state-of-the-art countermeasures and introduce a generic method to bypass them