36,551 research outputs found

    Research of two speed DCT electric power-train and control system

    Full text link
    University of Technology Sydney. Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology.The research for this thesis is based on an international cooperation project with BAIC Motor Electric Vehicle Co. Ltd, UTS and AVL/NTC. It aims to develop a sample of a two speed DCT used in an electric drive system. For the dual clutchโ€™s structural characteristics, one clutch is connected with one gear, so it is very simple to realize two speed driving. Simulation models are built in a co-simulation platform using AMESim and Simulink. Gear ratio selection is processed during the matching of Q60FB and C70GB vehicles. The ratios selected are 2nd and 3rd gear, and the ratios are 8.45 and 5.36. The prototype is modified from a VW 6spd DCT to operate at 2 speeds. The work primarily involves modification of the mechanical part of the gears and shaft, and changing the hydraulic parts. To optimize vehicle dynamics and economic performance, a shifting schedule calculation method for PEVs is provided. This uses a graphical development method and is adapted for the purposes of simulations and experimental work. As long as gear shifts are initiated according to the schedule, the EM will be maintained at a higher efficiency operating region. As a result, the proposed method provides more efficient operations of the PEV. Study of the control algorithm, including the vehicle control algorithm and shift control algorithm, is the core of this thesis. To investigate shift control and its calibration of a two speed DCT electric drive power-train, this thesis analyzes the shifting process. The vehicle control algorithm section follows the judgment of the pure electric multimode algorithm. The shift control section analyses the traditional DCT control shifting algorithm. In addition, the shifting control algorithm is based on motor active braking control. Detailed shifting control algorithms are developed which include power-on and power-off methods. Corresponding simulation analysis has also been carried out. The rig test uses the UTS power-train test bench for the purposes of modification. Calibration and testing works are employed for processing and the test rig mainly calibrates the shift control algorithm, DCT temperature testing, and NEDC and UDDS drive cycles testing. Vehicle integration and testing are finished at BJEV. This is based on the BAIC independent brand car of Q60FB, with two gear DCT prototype mounting and road test calibration. Finally, the project tests dynamic and economic performance

    ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ธํœ ๋ชจํ„ฐ ํ† ํฌ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2021.8. ์ด๊ฒฝ์ˆ˜.์ง€๋‚œ 10๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด์‹œ์Šคํ…œ(ESC)์€ ์น˜๋ช…์ ์ธ ์ถฉ๋Œ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ์ƒ์šฉ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์—์„œ ๋น„์•ฝ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐœ์ „๋˜๊ณ  ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์•…์ฒœํ›„๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ฏธ๋„๋Ÿฌ์šด ๋„๋กœ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์œ„ํ—˜ํ•œ ๋„๋กœ์—์„œ ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ •ํ•œ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์ฃผํ–‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์‚ฌ๊ณ ๋ฅผ ํ”ผํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํฐ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์ตœ๊ทผ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ๋˜๋Š” ์Šคํฌ์ธ ์นด ๋“ฑ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ œ๋™์ œ์–ด์˜ ๋นˆ๋ฒˆํ•œ ๊ฐœ์ž…์€ ์šด์ „์˜ ์ฆ๊ฑฐ์›€์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ถˆ๋งŒ๋„ ์กด์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ „๋™ํ™”์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜, ์ž๋Ÿ‰ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์ž‘๋™ ์˜์—ญ์ธ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ฃผํ–‰ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ฐ ํœ ์˜ ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์ธ ๊ตฌ๋™์„ ์ ์šฉ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ ์ธํœ  ๋ชจํ„ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ข…, ํšก๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ œ์–ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋Š” ํ† ํฌ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์„ ํšŒ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ฃผํ–‰ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏน ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ† ํฌ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ์ฃผํ–‰ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์ธ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž๋™ ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ์ œ์–ด ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ† ํฌ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง์ œ์–ด์— ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏนํ•œ ์ฃผํ–‰๋ชจ๋“œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฏธ๋„๋Ÿฌ์šด ๋„๋กœ์—์„œ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋†’์€ ์Šฌ๋ฆฝ ๊ฐ๋„์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณต ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ธํœ  ๋ชจํ„ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ „๋ฅœ์— 2๊ฐœ ๋ชจํ„ฐ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ณ ์œ ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์ธ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์–ธ๋”์Šคํ‹ฐ์–ด ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ์ง์ ‘์  ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์˜ ์ฑ„ํ„ฐ๋ง ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๊ณ  ๋น ๋ฅธ ์‘๋‹ต์„ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ณผ๋„ ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์‹ํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ๋ฐ ๊ณผ๋„ ํŠน์„ฑ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ISO ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์š” ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์™€ ํšก ์Šฌ๋ฆฝ ๊ฐ๋„ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ MASMC (Multiple Adaptive Sliding Mode Control) ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” 4๋ฅœ ๋ชจํ„ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๋™์  ํ† ํฌ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋†’์€ ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ „ํ›„๋ฅœ ํƒ€์ด์–ด์˜ ์ฝ”๋„ˆ๋ง ๊ฐ•์„ฑ์€ ์ ์‘์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์•ˆ์ „๋ชจ๋“œ์™€ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏน ๋ชจ๋“œ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ, ์šด์ „์ž๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ๊ธˆ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผํ–‰์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ์„ ํƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด MASMC ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ „๋™ํ™” ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์— ์ฃผํ–‰์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๊ณผ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏนํ•œ ์ฃผํ–‰์˜ ์ฆ๊ฑฐ์›€์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋กœ์จ, ์ „์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.In the last ten decades, vehicle stability control systems have been dramatically developed and adapted in many commercial vehicles to avoid fatal crashes. Significantly, ESC (Electric Stability Control) system can help escape the accident from unstable driving conditions with dangerous roads such as slippery roads due to inclement weather conditions. However, for the high performed vehicle, frequent intervention from ESC reduces the pleasure of fun-to-drive. Recently, the development of traction control technologies has been taking place with that of the electrification of vehicles. The IWMs (In-Wheel Motor system), which is one of the systems that can apply independent drive of each wheel, for the limit handling characteristics, which are the operation areas of the ESC, is introduced for the control that enables the lateral characteristics of the vehicle dynamics. Firstly, the automated drift control algorithm can be proposed for the nonlinear limit handling condition of vehicles. This approach can give an insight of fun-to-drive mode to TV (Torque Vector) control scheme, but also the stability control of high sideslip angle of the vehicle on slippery roads. Secondly, using IWMs system with front two motors, understeer gradient of vehicle, which is the unique characteristics of vehicle can be used for the proposed control strategy. A new transient parameter is formulated to be acquired rapid response of controller and reducing chattering effects. Simulation and vehicle tests are conducted for validation of TV control algorithm with steady-state and transient ISO-based tests. Finally, dynamic torque vectoring control with a four-wheel motor system with Multiple Adaptive Sliding Mode Control (MASMC) approach, which is composed of a yaw rate controller and sideslip angle controller, is introduced. Highly nonlinear characteristics, cornering stiffnesses of front and rear tires are estimated by adaptation law with measuring data. Consequently, there are two types of driving modes, the safety mode and the dynamic mode. MASMC algorithm can be found and validated by simulation in torque vectoring technology to improve the handling performance of fully electric vehicles.Chapter 1 Introduction 7 1.1. Background and Motivation 7 1.2. Literature review 11 1.3. Thesis Objectives 15 1.4. Thesis Outline 15 Chapter 2 Vehicle dynamic control at limit handling 17 2.1. Vehicle Model and Analysis 17 2.1.1. Lateral dynamics of vehicle 17 2.1.2. Longitudinal dynamics of vehicle 20 2.2. Tire Model 24 2.3. Analysis of vehicle drift for fun-to-drive 28 2.4. Designing A Controller for Automated Drift 34 2.4.1. Lateral controller 35 2.4.2. Longitudinal Controller 37 2.4.3. Stability Analysis 39 2.4.4. Validation with simulation and test 40 Chapter 3 Torque Vectoring Control with Front Two Motor In-Wheel Vehicles 47 3.1. Dynamic Torque Vectoring Control 48 3.1.1. In-wheel motor system (IWMs) 48 3.1.2. Dynamic system modeling 49 3.1.3. Designing controller 53 3.2. Validation with Simulation and Experiment 59 3.2.1. Simulation 59 3.2.2. Vehicle Experiment 64 Chapter 4 Dynamic handling control for Four-wheel Drive In-Wheel platform 75 4.1. Vehicle System Modeling 76 4.2. Motion Control based on MASMC 78 4.2.1. Yaw motion controller for the inner ASMC 80 4.2.2. Sideslip angle controller for the outer ASMC 84 4.3. Optimal Torque Distribution (OTD) 88 4.3.1. Constraints of dynamics 88 4.3.2. Optimal torque distribution law 90 4.4. Validation with Simulation 91 4.4.1. Simulation setup 91 4.4.2. Simulation results 92 Chapter 5 Conclusion and Future works 104 5.1 Conclusion 104 5.2 Future works 106 Bibliography 108 Abstract in Korean 114๋ฐ•

    A state-of-the-art review on torque distribution strategies aimed at enhancing energy efficiency for fully electric vehicles with independently actuated drivetrains

    Get PDF
    ยฉ 2019, Levrotto and Bella. All rights reserved. Electric vehicles are the future of private passenger transportation. However, there are still several technological barriers that hinder the large scale adoption of electric vehicles. In particular, their limited autonomy motivates studies on methods for improving the energy efficiency of electric vehicles so as to make them more attractive to the market. This paper provides a concise review on the current state-of-the-art of torque distribution strategies aimed at enhancing energy efficiency for fully electric vehicles with independently actuated drivetrains (FEVIADs). Starting from the operating principles, which include the "control allocation" problem, the peculiarities of each proposed solution are illustrated. All the existing techniques are categorized based on a selection of parameters deemed relevant to provide a comprehensive overview and understanding of the topic. Finally, future concerns and research perspectives for FEVIAD are discussed

    Multi-objective optimisation for battery electric vehicle powertrain topologies

    Get PDF
    Electric vehicles are becoming more popular in the market. To be competitive, manufacturers need to produce vehicles with a low energy consumption, a good range and an acceptable driving performance. These are dependent on the choice of components and the topology in which they are used. In a conventional gasoline vehicle, the powertrain topology is constrained to a few well-understood layouts; these typically consist of a single engine driving one axle or both axles through a multi-ratio gearbox. With electric vehicles, there is more flexibility, and the design space is relatively unexplored. In this paper, we evaluate several different topologies as follows: a traditional topology using a single electric motor driving a single axle with a fixed gear ratio; a topology using separate motors for the front axle and the rear axle, each with its own fixed gear ratio; a topology using in-wheel motors on a single axle; a four-wheel-drive topology using in-wheel motors on both axes. Multi-objective optimisation techniques are used to find the optimal component sizing for a given requirement set and to investigate the trade-offs between the energy consumption, the powertrain cost and the acceleration performance. The paper concludes with a discussion of the relative merits of the different topologies and their applicability to real-world passenger cars

    Comparison of Direct Multiobjective Optimization Methods for the Design of Electric Vehicles

    Get PDF
    "System design oriented methodologies" are discussed in this paper through the comparison of multiobjective optimization methods applied to heterogeneous devices in electrical engineering. Avoiding criteria function derivatives, direct optimization algorithms are used. In particular, deterministic geometric methods such as the Hooke & Jeeves heuristic approach are compared with stochastic evolutionary algorithms (Pareto genetic algorithms). Different issues relative to convergence rapidity and robustness on mixed (continuous/discrete), constrained and multiobjective problems are discussed. A typical electrical engineering heterogeneous and multidisciplinary system is considered as a case study: the motor drive of an electric vehicle. Some results emphasize the capacity of each approach to facilitate system analysis and particularly to display couplings between optimization parameters, constraints, objectives and the driving mission

    A Real-time Nonlinear Model Predictive Controller for Yaw Motion Optimization of Distributed Drive Electric Vehicles

    Get PDF
    This paper proposes a real-time nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) strategy for direct yaw moment control (DYC) of distributed drive electric vehicles (DDEVs). The NMPC strategy is based on a control-oriented model built by integrating a single track vehicle model with the Magic Formula (MF) tire model. To mitigate the NMPC computational cost, the continuation/generalized minimal residual (C/GMRES) algorithm is employed and modified for real-time optimization. Since the traditional C/GMRES algorithm cannot directly solve the inequality constraint problem, the external penalty method is introduced to transform inequality constraints into an equivalently unconstrained optimization problem. Based on the Pontryaginโ€™s minimum principle (PMP), the existence and uniqueness for solution of the proposed C/GMRES algorithm are proven. Additionally, to achieve fast initialization in C/GMRES algorithm, the varying predictive duration is adopted so that the analytic expressions of optimally initial solutions in C/GMRES algorithm can be derived and gained. A Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) condition based control allocation method distributes the desired traction and yaw moment among four independent motors. Numerical simulations are carried out by combining CarSim and Matlab/Simulink to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy. Results demonstrate that the real-time NMPC strategy can achieve superior vehicle stability performance, guarantee the given safety constraints, and significantly reduce the computational efforts

    Time-optimal Control Strategies for Electric Race Cars with Different Transmission Technologies

    Get PDF
    This paper presents models and optimization methods to rapidly compute the achievable lap time of a race car equipped with a battery electric powertrain. Specifically, we first derive a quasi-convex model of the electric powertrain, including the battery, the electric machine, and two transmission technologies: a single-speed fixed gear and a continuously variable transmission (CVT). Second, assuming an expert driver, we formulate the time-optimal control problem for a given driving path and solve it using an iterative convex optimization algorithm. Finally, we showcase our framework by comparing the performance achievable with a single-speed transmission and a CVT on the Le Mans track. Our results show that a CVT can balance its lower efficiency and higher weight with a higher-efficiency and more aggressive motor operation, and significantly outperform a fixed single-gear transmission.Comment: 5 pages, 4 figures, submitted to the 2020 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conferenc
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore