Pruning, Pushdown Exception-Flow Analysis

Statically reasoning in the presence of exceptions and about the effects of exceptions is challenging: exception-flows are mutually determined by traditional control-flow and points-to analyses. We tackle the challenge of analyzing exception-flows from two angles. First, from the angle of pruning control-flows (both normal and exceptional), we derive a pushdown framework for an object-oriented language with full-featured exceptions. Unlike traditional analyses, it allows precise matching of throwers to catchers. Second, from the angle of pruning points-to information, we generalize abstract garbage collection to object-oriented programs and enhance it with liveness analysis. We then seamlessly weave the techniques into enhanced reachability computation, yielding highly precise exception-flow analysis, without becoming intractable, even for large applications. We evaluate our pruned, pushdown exception-flow analysis, comparing it with an established analysis on large scale standard Java benchmarks. The results show that our analysis significantly improves analysis precision over traditional analysis within a reasonable analysis time.Comment: 14th IEEE International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulatio

A tale of two worlds:assessing the vulnerability of enclave shielding runtimes

status: publishe

A compiler level intermediate representation based binary analysis system and its applications

Analyzing and optimizing programs from their executables has received a lot of attention recently in the research community. There has been a tremendous amount of activity in executable-level research targeting varied applications such as security vulnerability analysis, untrusted code analysis, malware analysis, program testing, and binary optimizations. The vision of this dissertation is to advance the field of static analysis of executables and bridge the gap between source-level analysis and executable analysis. The main thesis of this work is scalable static binary rewriting and analysis using compiler-level intermediate representation without relying on the presence of metadata information such as debug or symbolic information. In spite of a significant overlap in the overall goals of several source-code methods and executables-level techniques, several sophisticated transformations that are well-understood and implemented in source-level infrastructures have yet to become available in executable frameworks. It is a well known fact that a standalone executable without any meta data is less amenable to analysis than the source code. Nonetheless, we believe that one of the prime reasons behind the limitations of existing executable frameworks is that current executable frameworks define their own intermediate representations (IR) which are significantly more constrained than an IR used in a compiler. Intermediate representations used in existing binary frameworks lack high level features like abstract stack, variables, and symbols and are even machine dependent in some cases. This severely limits the application of well-understood compiler transformations to executables and necessitates new research to make them applicable. In the first part of this dissertation, we present techniques to convert the binaries to the same high-level intermediate representation that compilers use. We propose methods to segment the flat address space in an executable containing undifferentiated blocks of memory. We demonstrate the inadequacy of existing variable identification methods for their promotion to symbols and present our methods for symbol promotion. We also present methods to convert the physically addressed stack in an executable to an abstract stack. The proposed methods are practical since they do not employ symbolic, relocation, or debug information which are usually absent in deployed executables. We have integrated our techniques with a prototype x86 binary framework called \emph{SecondWrite} that uses LLVM as the IR. The robustness of the framework is demonstrated by handling executables totaling more than a million lines of source-code, including several real world programs. In the next part of this work, we demonstrate that several well-known source-level analysis frameworks such as symbolic analysis have limited effectiveness in the executable domain since executables typically lack higher-level semantics such as program variables. The IR should have a precise memory abstraction for an analysis to effectively reason about memory operations. Our first work of recovering a compiler-level representation addresses this limitation by recovering several higher-level semantics information from executables. In the next part of this work, we propose methods to handle the scenarios when such semantics cannot be recovered. First, we propose a hybrid static-dynamic mechanism for recovering a precise and correct memory model in executables in presence of executable-specific artifacts such as indirect control transfers. Next, the enhanced memory model is employed to define a novel symbolic analysis framework for executables that can perform the same types of program analysis as source-level tools. Frameworks hitherto fail to simultaneously maintain the properties of correct representation and precise memory model and ignore memory-allocated variables while defining symbolic analysis mechanisms. We exemplify that our framework is robust, efficient and it significantly improves the performance of various traditional analyses like global value numbering, alias analysis and dependence analysis for executables. Finally, the underlying representation and analysis framework is employed for two separate applications. First, the framework is extended to define a novel static analysis framework, \emph{DemandFlow}, for identifying information flow security violations in program executables. Unlike existing static vulnerability detection methods for executables, DemandFlow analyzes memory locations in addition to symbols, thus improving the precision of the analysis. DemandFlow proposes a novel demand-driven mechanism to identify and precisely analyze only those program locations and memory accesses which are relevant to a vulnerability, thus enhancing scalability. DemandFlow uncovers six previously undiscovered format string and directory traversal vulnerabilities in popular ftp and internet relay chat clients. Next, the framework is extended to implement a platform-specific optimization for embedded processors. Several embedded systems provide the facility of locking one or more lines in the cache. We devise the first method in literature that employs instruction cache locking as a mechanism for improving the average-case run-time of general embedded applications. We demonstrate that the optimal solution for instruction cache locking can be obtained in polynomial time. Since our scheme is implemented inside a binary framework, it successfully addresses the portability concern by enabling the implementation of cache locking at the time of deployment when all the details of the memory hierarchy are available

Sound and Precise Malware Analysis for Android via Pushdown Reachability and Entry-Point Saturation

We present Anadroid, a static malware analysis framework for Android apps. Anadroid exploits two techniques to soundly raise precision: (1) it uses a pushdown system to precisely model dynamically dispatched interprocedural and exception-driven control-flow; (2) it uses Entry-Point Saturation (EPS) to soundly approximate all possible interleavings of asynchronous entry points in Android applications. (It also integrates static taint-flow analysis and least permissions analysis to expand the class of malicious behaviors which it can catch.) Anadroid provides rich user interface support for human analysts which must ultimately rule on the "maliciousness" of a behavior. To demonstrate the effectiveness of Anadroid's malware analysis, we had teams of analysts analyze a challenge suite of 52 Android applications released as part of the Auto- mated Program Analysis for Cybersecurity (APAC) DARPA program. The first team analyzed the apps using a ver- sion of Anadroid that uses traditional (finite-state-machine-based) control-flow-analysis found in existing malware analysis tools; the second team analyzed the apps using a version of Anadroid that uses our enhanced pushdown-based control-flow-analysis. We measured machine analysis time, human analyst time, and their accuracy in flagging malicious applications. With pushdown analysis, we found statistically significant (p < 0.05) decreases in time: from 85 minutes per app to 35 minutes per app in human plus machine analysis time; and statistically significant (p < 0.05) increases in accuracy with the pushdown-driven analyzer: from 71% correct identification to 95% correct identification.Comment: Appears in 3rd Annual ACM CCS workshop on Security and Privacy in SmartPhones and Mobile Devices (SPSM'13), Berlin, Germany, 201

Automatically proving termination and memory safety for programs with pointer arithmetic

While automated verification of imperative programs has been studied intensively, proving termination of programs with explicit pointer arithmetic fully automatically was still an open problem. To close this gap, we introduce a novel abstract domain that can track allocated memory in detail. We use it to automatically construct a symbolic execution graph that over-approximates all possible runs of a program and that can be used to prove memory safety. This graph is then transformed into an integer transition system, whose termination can be proved by standard techniques. We implemented this approach in the automated termination prover AProVE and demonstrate its capability of analyzing C programs with pointer arithmetic that existing tools cannot handle