Sequent Calculus in the Topos of Trees

Nakano's "later" modality, inspired by G\"{o}del-L\"{o}b provability logic, has been applied in type systems and program logics to capture guarded recursion. Birkedal et al modelled this modality via the internal logic of the topos of trees. We show that the semantics of the propositional fragment of this logic can be given by linear converse-well-founded intuitionistic Kripke frames, so this logic is a marriage of the intuitionistic modal logic KM and the intermediate logic LC. We therefore call this logic $\mathrm{KM}_{\mathrm{lin}}$. We give a sound and cut-free complete sequent calculus for $\mathrm{KM}_{\mathrm{lin}}$ via a strategy that decomposes implication into its static and irreflexive components. Our calculus provides deterministic and terminating backward proof-search, yields decidability of the logic and the coNP-completeness of its validity problem. Our calculus and decision procedure can be restricted to drop linearity and hence capture KM.Comment: Extended version, with full proof details, of a paper accepted to FoSSaCS 2015 (this version edited to fix some minor typos

Forward refutation for Gödel-Dummett Logics

We propose a refutation calculus to check the unprovability of a formula in Gödel-Dummett logics. From refutations we can directly extract countermodels for unprovable formulas, moreover the calculus is designed so to support a forward proof-search strategy that can be understood as a top-down construction of a model

A Terminating Evaluation-Driven Variant of G3i

We present Gbu, a terminating variant of the sequent calculus G3i for intuitionistic propositional logic. Gbu modifies G3i by annotating the sequents so to distinguish rule applications into two phases: an unblocked phase where any rule can be backward applied, and a blocked phase where only right rules can be used. Derivations of Gbu have a trivial translation into G3i. Rules for right implication exploit an evaluation relation, defined on sequents; this is the key tool to avoid the generation of branches of infinite length in proof-search. To prove the completeness of Gbu, we introduce a refutation calculus Rbu for unprovability dual to Gbu. We provide a proof-search procedure that, given a sequent as input, returns either a Rbu-derivation or a Gbu-derivation of it

Proof Theory of Finite-valued Logics

The proof theory of many-valued systems has not been investigated to an extent comparable to the work done on axiomatizatbility of many-valued logics. Proof theory requires appropriate formalisms, such as sequent calculus, natural deduction, and tableaux for classical (and intuitionistic) logic. One particular method for systematically obtaining calculi for all finite-valued logics was invented independently by several researchers, with slight variations in design and presentation. The main aim of this report is to develop the proof theory of finite-valued first order logics in a general way, and to present some of the more important results in this area. In Systems covered are the resolution calculus, sequent calculus, tableaux, and natural deduction. This report is actually a template, from which all results can be specialized to particular logics

Through and beyond classicality: analyticity, embeddings, infinity

Structural proof theory deals with formal representation of proofs and with the investigation of their properties. This thesis provides an analysis of various non-classical logical systems using proof-theoretic methods. The approach consists in the formulation of analytic calculi for these logics which are then used in order to study their metalogical properties. A specific attention is devoted to studying the connections between classical and non-classical reasoning. In particular, the use of analytic sequent calculi allows one to regain desirable structural properties which are lost in non-classical contexts. In this sense, proof-theoretic versions of embeddings between non-classical logics - both finitary and infinitary - prove to be a useful tool insofar as they build a bridge between different logical regions

Focusing on contraction

Focusing [1] is a proof-theoretic device to structure proof search in the sequent calculus: it provides a normal form to cut-free proofs in which the application of invertible and non-invertible inference rules is structured in two separate and disjoint phases. It is commonly believed that every \u201creasonable\u201d sequent calculus has a natural focused version. Although stemming from proof-search considerations, focusing has not been thoroughly investigated in actual theorem proving, in particular w.r.t. termination, if not for the folk observations that only negative formulas need to be duplicated (or contracted if seen from the top down) in the focusing phase. We present a contraction-free (and hence terminating) focused proof system for multi-succedent propositional intuitionistic logic, which refines the G4ip calculus of Vorob\u2019ev, Hudelmeier and Dyckhoff. We prove the completeness of the approach semantically and argue that this offers a viable alternative to other more syntactical means

Graph-based decision for Gödel-Dummett logics

International audienceWe present a graph-based decision procedure for Gödel-Dummett logics and an algorithm to compute counter-models. A formula is transformed into a conditional bi-colored graph in which we detect some specific cycles and alternating chains using matrix computations. From an instance graph containing no such cycle (resp. no (n+1)-alternating chain) we extract a counter-model in LC (resp. LCn)