From Discourse Structure To Text Specificity: Studies Of Coherence Preferences

To successfully communicate through text, a writer needs to organize information into an understandable and well-structured discourse for the targeted audience. This involves deciding when to convey general statements, when to elaborate on details, and gauging how much details to convey, i.e., the level of specificity. This thesis explores the automatic prediction of text specificity, and whether the perception of specificity varies across different audiences. We characterize text specificity from two aspects: the instantiation discourse relation, and the specificity of sentences and words. We identify characteristics of instantiation that signify a change of specificity between sentences. Features derived from these characteristics substantially improve the detection of the relation. Using instantiation sentences as the basis for training, we propose a semi-supervised system to predict sentence specificity with speed and accuracy. Furthermore, we present insights into the effect of underspecified words and phrases on the comprehension of text, and the prediction of such words. We show distinct preferences in specificity and discourse structure among different audiences. We investigate these distinctions in both cross-lingual and monolingual context. Cross-lingually, we identify discourse factors that significantly impact the quality of text translated from Chinese to English. Notably, a large portion of Chinese sentences are significantly more specific and need to be translated into multiple English sentences. We introduce a system using rich syntactic features to accurately detect such sentences. We also show that simplified text is more general, and that specific sentences are more likely to need simplification. Finally, we present evidence that the perception of sentence specificity differs among male and female readers

The biomedical discourse relation bank

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Identification of discourse relations, such as causal and contrastive relations, between situations mentioned in text is an important task for biomedical text-mining. A biomedical text corpus annotated with discourse relations would be very useful for developing and evaluating methods for biomedical discourse processing. However, little effort has been made to develop such an annotated resource.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We have developed the Biomedical Discourse Relation Bank (BioDRB), in which we have annotated explicit and implicit discourse relations in 24 open-access full-text biomedical articles from the GENIA corpus. Guidelines for the annotation were adapted from the Penn Discourse TreeBank (PDTB), which has discourse relations annotated over open-domain news articles. We introduced new conventions and modifications to the sense classification. We report reliable inter-annotator agreement of over 80% for all sub-tasks. Experiments for identifying the sense of explicit discourse connectives show the connective itself as a highly reliable indicator for coarse sense classification (accuracy 90.9% and F1 score 0.89). These results are comparable to results obtained with the same classifier on the PDTB data. With more refined sense classification, there is degradation in performance (accuracy 69.2% and F1 score 0.28), mainly due to sparsity in the data. The size of the corpus was found to be sufficient for identifying the sense of explicit connectives, with classifier performance stabilizing at about 1900 training instances. Finally, the classifier performs poorly when trained on PDTB and tested on BioDRB (accuracy 54.5% and F1 score 0.57).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our work shows that discourse relations can be reliably annotated in biomedical text. Coarse sense disambiguation of explicit connectives can be done with high reliability by using just the connective as a feature, but more refined sense classification requires either richer features or more annotated data. The poor performance of a classifier trained in the open domain and tested in the biomedical domain suggests significant differences in the semantic usage of connectives across these domains, and provides robust evidence for a biomedical sublanguage for discourse and the need to develop a specialized biomedical discourse annotated corpus. The results of our cross-domain experiments are consistent with related work on identifying connectives in BioDRB.</p

Improving Implicit Discourse Relation Classification by Modeling Inter-dependencies of Discourse Units in a Paragraph

We argue that semantic meanings of a sentence or clause can not be interpreted independently from the rest of a paragraph, or independently from all discourse relations and the overall paragraph-level discourse structure. With the goal of improving implicit discourse relation classification, we introduce a paragraph-level neural networks that model inter-dependencies between discourse units as well as discourse relation continuity and patterns, and predict a sequence of discourse relations in a paragraph. Experimental results show that our model outperforms the previous state-of-the-art systems on the benchmark corpus of PDTB.Comment: Accepted by NAACL 201

TOWARDS BUILDING AN INTELLIGENT REVISION ASSISTANT FOR ARGUMENTATIVE WRITINGS

Current intelligent writing assistance tools (e.g. Grammarly, Turnitin, etc.) typically work by locating the problems of essays for users (grammar, spelling, argument, etc.) and providing possible solutions. These tools focus on providing feedback on a single draft, while ignoring feedback on an author’s changes between drafts (revision). This thesis argues that it is also important to provide feedback on authors’ revision, as such information can not only improve the quality of the writing but also improve the rewriting skill of the authors. Thus, it is desirable to build an intelligent assistant that focuses on providing feedback to revisions. This thesis presents work from two perspectives towards the building of such an assistant: 1) a study of the revision’s impact on writings, which includes the development of a sentence-level revision schema, the annotation of corpora based on the schema and data analysis on the created corpora; a prototype revision assistant was built to provide revision feedback based on the schema and a user study was conducted to investigate whether the assistant could influence the users’ rewriting behaviors. 2) the development of algorithms for automatic revision identification, which includes the automatic extraction of the revised content and the automatic classification of revision types; we first investigated the two problems separately in a pipeline manner and then explored a joint approach that solves the two problems at the same time

Minors as miners: Modelling and evaluating ontological and linguistic learning

Gold Coas

Learning Explicit and Implicit Arabic Discourse Relations.

We propose in this paper a supervised learning approach to identify discourse relations in Arabic texts. To our knowledge, this work represents the first attempt to focus on both explicit and implicit relations that link adjacent as well as non adjacent Elementary Discourse Units (EDUs) within the Segmented Discourse Representation Theory (SDRT). We use the Discourse Arabic Treebank corpus (D-ATB) which is composed of newspaper documents extracted from the syntactically annotated Arabic Treebank v3.2 part3 where each document is associated with complete discourse graph according to the cognitive principles of SDRT. Our list of discourse relations is composed of a three-level hierarchy of 24 relations grouped into 4 top-level classes. To automatically learn them, we use state of the art features whose efficiency has been empirically proved. We investigate how each feature contributes to the learning process. We report our experiments on identifying fine-grained discourse relations, mid-level classes and also top-level classes. We compare our approach with three baselines that are based on the most frequent relation, discourse connectives and the features used by Al-Saif and Markert (2011). Our results are very encouraging and outperform all the baselines with an F-score of 78.1% and an accuracy of 80.6%