Realizability with Stateful Computations for Nonstandard Analysis

In this paper we propose a new approach to realizability interpretations for nonstandard arithmetic. We deal with nonstandard analysis in the context of intuitionistic realizability, focusing on the Lightstone-Robinson construction of a model for nonstandard analysis through an ultrapower. In particular, we consider an extension of the ?-calculus with a memory cell, that contains an integer (the state), in order to indicate in which slice of the ultrapower ?^{?} the computation is being done. We shall pay attention to the nonstandard principles (and their computational content) obtainable in this setting. We then discuss how this product could be quotiented to mimic the Lightstone-Robinson construction

Une Dialectica matérialiste

In this thesis, we give a computational interpretation to Gödel's Dialectica translation, in a fashion inspired by classical realizability. In particular, it can be shown that the Dialectica translation manipulates stacks of the Krivine machine as first-class objects and that the main effect at work lies in the accumulation of those stacks at each variable use. The original translation suffers from a handful of defects due to hacks used by Gödel to work around historical limitations. Once these defects are solved, the translation naturally extends to much more expressive settings such as dependent type theory. A few variants are studied thanks to the linear decomposition, and relationships with other translations such as forcing and CPS are scrutinized.Cette thèse fournit une interprétation calculatoire de la traduction dite Dialectica de Gödel, dans une démarche inspirée par la réalisabilité classique. On peut en particulier montrer que Dialectica manipule des piles de la machine de Krivine comme objets de première classe et que le principal effet de cette traduction consiste à accumuler ces piles à chaque utilisation de variables. La traduction d'origine souffre d'une certaine quantité de défauts dus aux hacks utilisés par Gödel pour contourner des limitations historiques. Une fois ces problèmes résolus, la traduction s'étend naturellement à des paradigmes beaucoup plus expressifs tels que la théorie des types dépendants. On étudie d'autres variantes par la suite grâce à la décomposition linéaire, ainsi que lien de parenté avec d'autres traductions tels que le forcing et les CPS

Stateful Realizers for Nonstandard Analysis

In this paper we propose a new approach to realizability interpretations for nonstandard arithmetic. We deal with nonstandard analysis in the context of (semi)intuitionistic realizability, focusing on the Lightstone-Robinson construction of a model for nonstandard analysis through an ultrapower. In particular, we consider an extension of the $\lambda$-calculus with a memory cell, that contains an integer (the state), in order to indicate in which slice of the ultrapower $\cal{M}^{\mathbb{N}}$ the computation is being done. We pay attention to the nonstandard principles (and their computational content) obtainable in this setting. In particular, we give non-trivial realizers to Idealization and a non-standard version of the LLPO principle. We then discuss how to quotient this product to mimic the Lightstone-Robinson construction

Polarities & Focussing: a journey from Realisability to Automated Reasoning

This dissertation explores the roles of polarities and focussing in various aspects of Computational Logic.These concepts play a key role in the the interpretation of proofs as programs, a.k.a. the Curry-Howard correspondence, in the context of classical logic. Arising from linear logic, they allow the construction of meaningful semantics for cut-elimination in classical logic, some of which relate to the Call-by-Name and Call-by-Value disciplines of functional programming. The first part of this dissertation provides an introduction to these interpretations, highlighting the roles of polarities and focussing. For instance: proofs of positive formulae provide structured data, while proofs of negative formulae consume such data; focussing allows the description of the interaction between the two kinds of proofs as pure pattern-matching. This idea is pushed further in the second part of this dissertation, and connected to realisability semantics, where the structured data is interpreted algebraically, and the consumption of such data is modelled with the use of an orthogonality relation. Most of this part has been proved in the Coq proof assistant.Polarities and focussing were also introduced with applications to logic programming in mind, where computation is proof-search. In the third part of this dissertation, we push this idea further by exploring the roles that these concepts can play in other applications of proof-search, such as theorem proving and more particularly automated reasoning. We use these concepts to describe the main algorithm of SAT-solvers and SMT-solvers: DPLL. We then describe the implementation of a proof-search engine called Psyche. Its architecture, based on the concept of focussing, offers a platform where smart techniques from automated reasoning (or a user interface) can safely and trustworthily be implemented via the use of an API

Revisiting the duality of computation: an algebraic analysis of classical realizability models

International audienc