Construction of parametric barrier functions for dynamical systems using interval analysis

International audienceRecently, barrier certificates have been introduced to prove the safety of continuous or hybrid dynamical systems. A barrier certificate needs to exhibit some barrier function, which partitions the state space in two subsets: the safe subset in which the state can be proved to remain and the complementary subset containing some unsafe region. This approach does not require any reachability analysis, but needs the computation of a valid barrier function, which is difficult when considering general nonlinear systems and barriers. This paper presents a new approach for the construction of barrier functions for nonlinear dynamical systems. The proposed technique searches for the parameters of a parametric barrier function using interval analysis. Complex dynamics can be considered without needing any relaxation of the constraints to be satisfied by the barrier function

Computation of Parametric Barrier Functions for Dynamical Systems using Interval Analysis

International audienceThe formal verification of safety properties for hybrid systems is an important but challenging problem. Recently, barrier functions have been introduced to prove safety without requiring the computation of the reachable set of continuous or hybrid dynamical systems. This paper presents a new approach for the construction of barrier functions for safety verification of nonlinear dynamical systems. The proposed method is based on the search for the parameters of a parametric barrier function using interval analysis. This technique allows considering complex dynamics without needing any relaxation of constraints in the barrier function

Analysis of parametric biological models with non-linear dynamics

In this paper we present recent results on parametric analysis of biological models. The underlying method is based on the algorithms for computing trajectory sets of hybrid systems with polynomial dynamics. The method is then applied to two case studies of biological systems: one is a cardiac cell model for studying the conditions for cardiac abnormalities, and the second is a model of insect nest-site choice.Comment: In Proceedings HSB 2012, arXiv:1208.315

Active Sampling-based Binary Verification of Dynamical Systems

Nonlinear, adaptive, or otherwise complex control techniques are increasingly relied upon to ensure the safety of systems operating in uncertain environments. However, the nonlinearity of the resulting closed-loop system complicates verification that the system does in fact satisfy those requirements at all possible operating conditions. While analytical proof-based techniques and finite abstractions can be used to provably verify the closed-loop system's response at different operating conditions, they often produce conservative approximations due to restrictive assumptions and are difficult to construct in many applications. In contrast, popular statistical verification techniques relax the restrictions and instead rely upon simulations to construct statistical or probabilistic guarantees. This work presents a data-driven statistical verification procedure that instead constructs statistical learning models from simulated training data to separate the set of possible perturbations into "safe" and "unsafe" subsets. Binary evaluations of closed-loop system requirement satisfaction at various realizations of the uncertainties are obtained through temporal logic robustness metrics, which are then used to construct predictive models of requirement satisfaction over the full set of possible uncertainties. As the accuracy of these predictive statistical models is inherently coupled to the quality of the training data, an active learning algorithm selects additional sample points in order to maximize the expected change in the data-driven model and thus, indirectly, minimize the prediction error. Various case studies demonstrate the closed-loop verification procedure and highlight improvements in prediction error over both existing analytical and statistical verification techniques.Comment: 23 page