14,946 research outputs found
Statistical Mechanics of Community Detection
Starting from a general \textit{ansatz}, we show how community detection can
be interpreted as finding the ground state of an infinite range spin glass. Our
approach applies to weighted and directed networks alike. It contains the
\textit{at hoc} introduced quality function from \cite{ReichardtPRL} and the
modularity as defined by Newman and Girvan \cite{Girvan03} as special
cases. The community structure of the network is interpreted as the spin
configuration that minimizes the energy of the spin glass with the spin states
being the community indices. We elucidate the properties of the ground state
configuration to give a concise definition of communities as cohesive subgroups
in networks that is adaptive to the specific class of network under study.
Further we show, how hierarchies and overlap in the community structure can be
detected. Computationally effective local update rules for optimization
procedures to find the ground state are given. We show how the \textit{ansatz}
may be used to discover the community around a given node without detecting all
communities in the full network and we give benchmarks for the performance of
this extension. Finally, we give expectation values for the modularity of
random graphs, which can be used in the assessment of statistical significance
of community structure
Different approaches to community detection
A precise definition of what constitutes a community in networks has remained
elusive. Consequently, network scientists have compared community detection
algorithms on benchmark networks with a particular form of community structure
and classified them based on the mathematical techniques they employ. However,
this comparison can be misleading because apparent similarities in their
mathematical machinery can disguise different reasons for why we would want to
employ community detection in the first place. Here we provide a focused review
of these different motivations that underpin community detection. This
problem-driven classification is useful in applied network science, where it is
important to select an appropriate algorithm for the given purpose. Moreover,
highlighting the different approaches to community detection also delineates
the many lines of research and points out open directions and avenues for
future research.Comment: 14 pages, 2 figures. Written as a chapter for forthcoming Advances in
network clustering and blockmodeling, and based on an extended version of The
many facets of community detection in complex networks, Appl. Netw. Sci. 2: 4
(2017) by the same author
Communities in Networks
We survey some of the concepts, methods, and applications of community
detection, which has become an increasingly important area of network science.
To help ease newcomers into the field, we provide a guide to available
methodology and open problems, and discuss why scientists from diverse
backgrounds are interested in these problems. As a running theme, we emphasize
the connections of community detection to problems in statistical physics and
computational optimization.Comment: survey/review article on community structure in networks; published
version is available at
http://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/~porterm/papers/comnotices.pd
Clique Graphs and Overlapping Communities
It is shown how to construct a clique graph in which properties of cliques of
a fixed order in a given graph are represented by vertices in a weighted graph.
Various definitions and motivations for these weights are given. The detection
of communities or clusters is used to illustrate how a clique graph may be
exploited. In particular a benchmark network is shown where clique graphs find
the overlapping communities accurately while vertex partition methods fail.Comment: 23 pages plus 16 additional pages in appendice
- …