1,123 research outputs found
Thread-Modular Static Analysis for Relaxed Memory Models
We propose a memory-model-aware static program analysis method for accurately
analyzing the behavior of concurrent software running on processors with weak
consistency models such as x86-TSO, SPARC-PSO, and SPARC-RMO. At the center of
our method is a unified framework for deciding the feasibility of inter-thread
interferences to avoid propagating spurious data flows during static analysis
and thus boost the performance of the static analyzer. We formulate the
checking of interference feasibility as a set of Datalog rules which are both
efficiently solvable and general enough to capture a range of hardware-level
memory models. Compared to existing techniques, our method can significantly
reduce the number of bogus alarms as well as unsound proofs. We implemented the
method and evaluated it on a large set of multithreaded C programs. Our
experiments showthe method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art
techniques in terms of accuracy with only moderate run-time overhead.Comment: revised version of the ESEC/FSE 2017 pape
Rigorous concurrency analysis of multithreaded programs
technical reportThis paper explores the practicality of conducting program analysis for multithreaded software using constraint solv- ing. By precisely defining the underlying memory consis- tency rules in addition to the intra-thread program seman- tics, our approach orders a unique advantage for program ver- ification | it provides an accurate and exhaustive coverage of all thread interleavings for any given memory model. We demonstrate how this can be achieved by formalizing sequen- tial consistency for a source language that supports control branches and a monitor-style mutual exclusion mechanism. We then discuss how to formulate programmer expectations as constraints and propose three concrete applications of this approach: execution validation, race detection, and atom- icity analysis. Finally, we describe the implementation of a formal analysis tool using constraint logic programming, with promising initial results for reasoning about small but non-trivial concurrent programs
Analyzing Conflict Freedom For Multi-threaded Programs With Time Annotations
Avoiding access conflicts is a major challenge in the design of
multi-threaded programs. In the context of real-time systems, the absence of
conflicts can be guaranteed by ensuring that no two potentially conflicting
accesses are ever scheduled concurrently.In this paper, we analyze programs
that carry time annotations specifying the time for executing each statement.
We propose a technique for verifying that a multi-threaded program with time
annotations is free of access conflicts. In particular, we generate constraints
that reflect the possible schedules for executing the program and the required
properties. We then invoke an SMT solver in order to verify that no execution
gives rise to concurrent conflicting accesses. Otherwise, we obtain a trace
that exhibits the access conflict.Comment: http://journal.ub.tu-berlin.de/eceasst/article/view/97
Liveness of Randomised Parameterised Systems under Arbitrary Schedulers (Technical Report)
We consider the problem of verifying liveness for systems with a finite, but
unbounded, number of processes, commonly known as parameterised systems.
Typical examples of such systems include distributed protocols (e.g. for the
dining philosopher problem). Unlike the case of verifying safety, proving
liveness is still considered extremely challenging, especially in the presence
of randomness in the system. In this paper we consider liveness under arbitrary
(including unfair) schedulers, which is often considered a desirable property
in the literature of self-stabilising systems. We introduce an automatic method
of proving liveness for randomised parameterised systems under arbitrary
schedulers. Viewing liveness as a two-player reachability game (between
Scheduler and Process), our method is a CEGAR approach that synthesises a
progress relation for Process that can be symbolically represented as a
finite-state automaton. The method is incremental and exploits both
Angluin-style L*-learning and SAT-solvers. Our experiments show that our
algorithm is able to prove liveness automatically for well-known randomised
distributed protocols, including Lehmann-Rabin Randomised Dining Philosopher
Protocol and randomised self-stabilising protocols (such as the Israeli-Jalfon
Protocol). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first fully-automatic
method that can prove liveness for randomised protocols.Comment: Full version of CAV'16 pape
Parameterized verification
The goal of parameterized verification is to prove the correctness of a system specification regardless of the number of its components. The problem is of interest in several different areas: verification of hardware design, multithreaded programs, distributed systems, and communication protocols. The problem is undecidable in general. Solutions for restricted classes of systems and properties have been studied in areas like theorem proving, model checking, automata and logic, process algebra, and constraint solving. In this introduction to the special issue, dedicated to a selection of works from the Parameterized Verification workshop PV \u201914 and PV \u201915, we survey some of the works developed in this research area
A unified view of parameterized verification of abstract models of broadcast communication
We give a unified view of different parameterized models of concurrent and distributed systems with broadcast communication based on transition systems. Based on the resulting formal models, we discuss related verification methods and tools based on abstractions and symbolic state exploration
- …