4,099 research outputs found
Constraint-Based Categorial Grammar
We propose a generalization of Categorial Grammar in which lexical categories
are defined by means of recursive constraints. In particular, the introduction
of relational constraints allows one to capture the effects of (recursive)
lexical rules in a computationally attractive manner. We illustrate the
linguistic merits of the new approach by showing how it accounts for the syntax
of Dutch cross-serial dependencies and the position and scope of adjuncts in
such constructions. Delayed evaluation is used to process grammars containing
recursive constraints.Comment: 8 pages, LaTe
Multi-dimensional Type Theory: Rules, Categories, and Combinators for Syntax and Semantics
We investigate the possibility of modelling the syntax and semantics of
natural language by constraints, or rules, imposed by the multi-dimensional
type theory Nabla. The only multiplicity we explicitly consider is two, namely
one dimension for the syntax and one dimension for the semantics, but the
general perspective is important. For example, issues of pragmatics could be
handled as additional dimensions.
One of the main problems addressed is the rather complicated repertoire of
operations that exists besides the notion of categories in traditional Montague
grammar. For the syntax we use a categorial grammar along the lines of Lambek.
For the semantics we use so-called lexical and logical combinators inspired by
work in natural logic. Nabla provides a concise interpretation and a sequent
calculus as the basis for implementations.Comment: 20 page
Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar
Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG) is a constraint-based or declarative approach to linguistic knowledge, which analyses all descriptive levels (phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics) with feature value pairs, structure sharing, and relational constraints. In syntax it assumes that expressions have a single relatively simple constituent structure. This volume provides a state-of-the-art introduction to the framework. Various chapters discuss basic assumptions and formal foundations, describe the evolution of the framework, and go into the details of the main syntactic phenomena. Further chapters are devoted to non-syntactic levels of description. The book also considers related fields and research areas (gesture, sign languages, computational linguistics) and includes chapters comparing HPSG with other frameworks (Lexical Functional Grammar, Categorial Grammar, Construction Grammar, Dependency Grammar, and Minimalism)
Type-driven semantic interpretation and feature dependencies in R-LFG
Once one has enriched LFG's formal machinery with the linear logic mechanisms
needed for semantic interpretation as proposed by Dalrymple et. al., it is
natural to ask whether these make any existing components of LFG redundant. As
Dalrymple and her colleagues note, LFG's f-structure completeness and coherence
constraints fall out as a by-product of the linear logic machinery they propose
for semantic interpretation, thus making those f-structure mechanisms
redundant. Given that linear logic machinery or something like it is
independently needed for semantic interpretation, it seems reasonable to
explore the extent to which it is capable of handling feature structure
constraints as well.
R-LFG represents the extreme position that all linguistically required
feature structure dependencies can be captured by the resource-accounting
machinery of a linear or similiar logic independently needed for semantic
interpretation, making LFG's unification machinery redundant. The goal is to
show that LFG linguistic analyses can be expressed as clearly and perspicuously
using the smaller set of mechanisms of R-LFG as they can using the much larger
set of unification-based mechanisms in LFG: if this is the case then we will
have shown that positing these extra f-structure mechanisms is not
linguistically warranted.Comment: 30 pages, to appear in the the ``Glue Language'' volume edited by
Dalrymple, uses tree-dvips, ipa, epic, eepic, fullnam
Interaction Grammars
Interaction Grammar (IG) is a grammatical formalism based on the notion of
polarity. Polarities express the resource sensitivity of natural languages by
modelling the distinction between saturated and unsaturated syntactic
structures. Syntactic composition is represented as a chemical reaction guided
by the saturation of polarities. It is expressed in a model-theoretic framework
where grammars are constraint systems using the notion of tree description and
parsing appears as a process of building tree description models satisfying
criteria of saturation and minimality
From treebank resources to LFG F-structures
We present two methods for automatically annotating treebank resources with functional structures. Both methods define systematic patterns of correspondence between partial PS configurations and functional structures. These are applied to PS rules extracted from treebanks, or directly to constraint set encodings of treebank PS trees
- …