Reinforcement Learning Scheduler for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications Outside Coverage

Radio resources in vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication can be scheduled either by a centralized scheduler residing in the network (e.g., a base station in case of cellular systems) or a distributed scheduler, where the resources are autonomously selected by the vehicles. The former approach yields a considerably higher resource utilization in case the network coverage is uninterrupted. However, in case of intermittent or out-of-coverage, due to not having input from centralized scheduler, vehicles need to revert to distributed scheduling. Motivated by recent advances in reinforcement learning (RL), we investigate whether a centralized learning scheduler can be taught to efficiently pre-assign the resources to vehicles for out-of-coverage V2V communication. Specifically, we use the actor-critic RL algorithm to train the centralized scheduler to provide non-interfering resources to vehicles before they enter the out-of-coverage area. Our initial results show that a RL-based scheduler can achieve performance as good as or better than the state-of-art distributed scheduler, often outperforming it. Furthermore, the learning process completes within a reasonable time (ranging from a few hundred to a few thousand epochs), thus making the RL-based scheduler a promising solution for V2V communications with intermittent network coverage.Comment: Article published in IEEE VNC 201

Energy-Efficient Scheduling for Homogeneous Multiprocessor Systems

We present a number of novel algorithms, based on mathematical optimization formulations, in order to solve a homogeneous multiprocessor scheduling problem, while minimizing the total energy consumption. In particular, for a system with a discrete speed set, we propose solving a tractable linear program. Our formulations are based on a fluid model and a global scheduling scheme, i.e. tasks are allowed to migrate between processors. The new methods are compared with three global energy/feasibility optimal workload allocation formulations. Simulation results illustrate that our methods achieve both feasibility and energy optimality and outperform existing methods for constrained deadline tasksets. Specifically, the results provided by our algorithm can achieve up to an 80% saving compared to an algorithm without a frequency scaling scheme and up to 70% saving compared to a constant frequency scaling scheme for some simulated tasksets. Another benefit is that our algorithms can solve the scheduling problem in one step instead of using a recursive scheme. Moreover, our formulations can solve a more general class of scheduling problems, i.e. any periodic real-time taskset with arbitrary deadline. Lastly, our algorithms can be applied to both online and offline scheduling schemes.Comment: Corrected typos: definition of J_i in Section 2.1; (3b)-(3c); definition of \Phi_A and \Phi_D in paragraph after (6b). Previous equations were correct only for special case of p_i=d_