Constant-Round Concurrent Zero-Knowledge From Falsifiable Assumptions

We present a constant-round concurrent zero-knowledge protocol for \NP. Our protocol is sound against uniform polynomial-time attackers, and relies on the existence of families of collision-resistant hash functions, and a new (but in our eyes, natural) falsifiable intractability assumption: Roughly speaking, that Micali's non-interactive CS-proofs are sound for languages in $\P$

On Constant-Round Concurrent Zero-Knowledge from a Knowledge Assumption

In this work, we consider the long-standing open question of constructing constant-round concurrent zero-knowledge protocols in the plain model. Resolving this question is known to require non-black-box techniques. We consider non-black-box techniques for zero-knowledge based on knowledge assumptions, a line of thinking initiated by the work of Hada and Tanaka (CRYPTO 1998). Prior to our work, it was not known whether knowledge assumptions could be used for achieving security in the concurrent setting, due to a number of significant limitations that we discuss here. Nevertheless, we obtain the following results: 1. We obtain the first constant round concurrent zero-knowledge argument for \textbf{NP} in the plain model based on a new variant of knowledge of exponent assumption. Furthermore, our construction avoids the inefficiency inherent in previous non-black-box techniques such that those of Barak (FOCS 2001); we obtain our result through an efficient protocol compiler. 2. Unlike Hada and Tanaka, we do not require a knowledge assumption to argue the soundness of our protocol. Instead, we use a discrete log like assumption, which we call Diffie-Hellman Logarithm Assumption, to prove the soundness of our protocol. 3. We give evidence that our new variant of knowledge of exponent assumption is in fact plausible. In particular, we show that our assumption holds in the generic group model. 4. Knowledge assumptions are especially delicate assumptions whose plausibility may be hard to gauge. We give a novel framework to express knowledge assumptions in a more flexible way, which may allow for formulation of plausible assumptions and exploration of their impact and application in cryptography.Comment: 30 pages, 3 figure

Concurrent Non-Malleable Commitments (and More) in 3 Rounds

The round complexity of commitment schemes secure against man-in-the-middle attacks has been the focus of extensive research for about 25 years. The recent breakthrough of Goyal et al. [22] showed that 3 rounds are sufficient for (one-left, one-right) non-malleable commitments. This result matches a lower bound of [41]. The state of affairs leaves still open the intriguing problem of constructing 3-round concurrent non-malleable commitment schemes. In this paper we solve the above open problem by showing how to transform any 3-round (one-left one-right) non-malleable commitment scheme (with some extractability property) in a 3-round concurrent nonmalleable commitment scheme. Our transform makes use of complexity leveraging and when instantiated with the construction of [22] gives a 3-round concurrent non-malleable commitment scheme from one-way permutations secure w.r.t. subexponential-time adversaries. We also show a 3-round arguments of knowledge and a 3-round identification scheme secure against concurrent man-in-the-middle attacks

On the (In)security of the Fiat-Shamir Paradigm, Revisited

The Fiat-Shamir paradigm [CRYPTO\u2786] is a heuristic for converting 3-round identification schemes into signature schemes, and more generally, for collapsing rounds in public-coin interactive protocols. This heuristic is very popular both in theory and in practice, and many researchers have studied its security (and insecurity). In this work, we continue this study. As our main result, we show that for many well studied interactive *proofs* (and arguments) the soundness of the Fiat-Shamir heuristic cannot be proven via a black-box reduction to any falsifiable assumption. Previously, the insecurity of this paradigm was exemplified only when applied to interactive arguments (as opposed to proofs). Using similar techniques, we also show a black-box impossibility result for Micali\u27s CS-proofs [FOCS\u2794]. Namely, we prove that there exist PCPs such that for sufficiently hard\u27\u27 NP languages, Micali\u27s CS-proof cannot be proven sound via black-box reduction to any falsifiable assumption. These results are obtained by extending the impossibility of two-message zero knowledge protocols due to Goldreich and Oren [J. Cryptology\u2794]

On a New, Efficient Framework for Falsifiable Non-interactive Zero-Knowledge Arguments

Et kunnskapsløst bevis er en protokoll mellom en bevisfører og en attestant. Bevisføreren har som mål å overbevise attestanten om at visse utsagn er korrekte, som besittelse av kortnummeret til et gyldig kredittkort, uten å avsløre noen private opplysninger, som for eksempel kortnummeret selv. I mange anvendelser er det ønskelig å bruke IIK-bevis (Ikke-interaktive kunnskapsløse bevis), der bevisføreren produserer kun en enkelt melding som kan bekreftes av mange attestanter. En ulempe er at sikre IIK-bevis for ikke-trivielle språk kun kan eksistere ved tilstedeværelsen av en pålitelig tredjepart som beregner en felles referansestreng som blir gjort tilgjengelig for både bevisføreren og attestanten. Når ingen slik part eksisterer liter man av og til på ikke-interaktiv vitne-uskillbarhet, en svakere form for personvern. Studiet av effektive og sikre IIK-bevis er en kritisk del av kryptografi som har blomstret opp i det siste grunnet anvendelser i blokkjeder. I den første artikkelen konstruerer vi et nytt IIK-bevis for språkene som består av alle felles nullpunkter for en endelig mengde polynomer over en endelig kropp. Vi demonstrerer nytteverdien av beviset ved flerfoldige eksempler på anvendelser. Særlig verdt å merke seg er at det er mulig å gå nesten automatisk fra en beskrivelse av et språk på et høyt nivå til definisjonen av IIK-beviset, som minsker behovet for dedikert kryptografisk ekspertise. I den andre artikkelen konstruerer vi et IIV-bevis ved å bruke en ny kompilator. Vi utforsker begrepet Kunnskapslydighet (et sterkere sikkerhetsbegrep enn lydighet) for noen konstruksjoner av IIK-bevis. I den tredje artikkelen utvider vi arbeidet fra den første artikkelen ved å konstruere et nytt IIK-bevis for mengde-medlemskap som lar oss bevise at et element ligger, eller ikke ligger, i den gitte mengden. Flere nye konstruksjoner har bedre effektivitet sammenlignet med allerede kjente konstruksjoner.A zero-knowledge proof is a protocol between a prover, and a verifier. The prover aims to convince the verifier of the truth of some statement, such as possessing credentials for a valid credit card, without revealing any private information, such as the credentials themselves. In many applications, it is desirable to use NIZKs (Non-Interactive Zero Knowledge) proofs, where the prover sends outputs only a single message that can be verified by many verifiers. As a drawback, secure NIZKs for non-trivial languages can only exist in the presence of a trusted third party that computes a common reference string and makes it available to both the prover and verifier. When no such party exists, one sometimes relies on non interactive witness indistinguishability (NIWI), a weaker notion of privacy. The study of efficient and secure NIZKs is a crucial part of cryptography that has been thriving recently due to blockchain applications. In the first paper, we construct a new NIZK for the language of common zeros of a finite set of polynomials over a finite field. We demonstrate its usefulness by giving a large number of example applications. Notably, it is possible to go from a high-level language description to the definition of the NIZK almost automatically, lessening the need for dedicated cryptographic expertise. In the second paper, we construct a NIWI using a new compiler. We explore the notion of Knowledge Soundness (a security notion stronger than soundness) of some NIZK constructions. In the third paper, we extended the first paper’s work by constructing a new set (non-)membership NIZK that allows us to prove that an element belongs or does not belong to the given set. Many new constructions have better efficiency compared to already-known constructions.Doktorgradsavhandlin

Four-Round Concurrent Non-Malleable Commitments from One-Way Functions

How many rounds and which assumptions are required for concurrent non-malleable commitments? The above question has puzzled researchers for several years. Pass in [TCC 2013] showed a lower bound of 3 rounds for the case of black-box reductions to falsifiable hardness assumptions with respect to polynomial-time adversaries. On the other side, Goyal [STOC 2011], Lin and Pass [STOC 2011] and Goyal et al. [FOCS 2012] showed that one-way functions (OWFs) are sufficient with a constant number of rounds. More recently Ciampi et al. [CRYPTO 2016] showed a 3-round construction based on subexponentially strong one-way permutations. In this work we show as main result the first 4-round concurrent non-malleable commitment scheme assuming the existence of any one-way function. Our approach builds on a new security notion for argument systems against man-in-the-middle attacks: Simulation-Witness-Independence. We show how to construct a 4-round one-many simulation-witnesses-independent argument system from one-way functions. We then combine this new tool in parallel with a weak form of non-malleable commitments constructed by Goyal et al. in [FOCS 2014] obtaining the main result of our work

Assumptions, Efficiency and Trust in Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs

Vi lever i en digital verden. En betydelig del av livene våre skjer på nettet, og vi bruker internett for stadig flere formål og er avhengig av stadig mer avansert teknologi. Det er derfor viktig å beskytte seg mot ondsinnede aktører som kan forsøke å utnytte denne avhengigheten for egen vinning. Kryptografi er en sentral del av svaret på hvordan man kan beskytte internettbrukere. Historisk sett har kryptografi hovedsakelig vært opptatt av konfidensiell kommunikasjon, altså at ingen kan lese private meldinger sendt mellom to personer. I de siste tiårene har kryptografi blitt mer opptatt av å lage protokoller som garanterer personvern selv om man kan gjennomføre komplekse handlinger. Et viktig kryptografisk verktøy for å sikre at disse protokollene faktisk følges er kunnskapsløse bevis. Et kunnskapsløst bevis er en prosess hvor to parter, en bevisfører og en attestant, utveksler meldinger for å overbevise attestanten om at bevisføreren fulgte protokollen riktig (hvis dette faktisk er tilfelle) uten å avsløre privat informasjon til attestanten. For de fleste anvendelser er det ønskelig å lage et ikke-interaktivt kunnskapsløst bevis (IIK-bevis), der bevisføreren kun sender én melding til attestanten. IIK-bevis har en rekke ulike bruksområder, som gjør de til attraktive studieobjekter. Et IIK-bevis har en rekke ulike egenskaper og forbedring av noen av disse fremmer vår kollektive kryptografiske kunnskap. I den første artikkelen i denne avhandlingen konstruerer vi et nytt ikke-interaktivt kunnskapsløst bevis for språk basert på algebraiske mengder. Denne artikkelen er basert på arbeid av Couteau og Hartmann (Crypto 2020), som viste hvordan man omformer et bestemt interaktivt kunnskapsløst bevis til et IIK-bevis. Vi følger deres tilnærming, men vi bruker et annet interaktivt kunnskapsløst bevis. Dette fører til en forbedring sammenlignet med arbeidet deres på flere områder, spesielt når det gjelder både formodninger og effektivitet. I den andre artikkelen i denne avhandlingen studerer vi egenskapene til ikke-interaktive kunnskapsløse bevis som er motstandsdyktige mot undergraving. Det er umulig å lage et IIK-bevis uten å stole på en felles referansestreng (FRS) generert av en pålitelig tredjepart. Men det finnes eksempler på IIK-bevis der ingen lærer noe privat informasjon fra beviset selv om den felles referansestrengen ble skapt på en uredelig måte. I denne artikkelen lager vi en ny kryptografisk primitiv (verifiserbart-uttrekkbare enveisfunksjoner) og viser hvordan denne primitiven er relatert til IIK-bevis med den ovennevnte egenskapen.We live in a digital world. A significant part of our lives happens online, and we use the internet for incredibly many different purposes and we rely on increasingly advanced technology. It therefore is important to protect against malicious actors who may try to exploit this reliance for their own gain. Cryptography is a key part of the answer to protecting internet users. Historically, cryptography has mainly been focused on maintaining the confidentiality of communication, ensuring that no one can read private messages sent between people. In recent decades, cryptography has become concerned with creating protocols which guarantee privacy even as they support more complex actions. A crucial cryptographic tool to ensure that these protocols are indeed followed is the zero-knowledge proof. A zero-knowledge proof is a process where two parties, a prover and a verifier, exchange messages to convince the verifier that the prover followed the protocol correctly (if indeed the prover did so) without revealing any private information to the verifier. It is often desirable to create a non-interactive zero-knowledge proof (NIZK), where the prover only sends one message to the verifier. NIZKs have found a number of different applications, which makes them an attractive object of study. A NIZK has a variety of different properties, and improving any of these aspects advances our collective cryptographic knowledge. In the first paper in this thesis, we construct a new non-interactive zero-knowledge proof for languages based on algebraic sets. This paper is based on work by Couteau and Hartmann (Crypto 2020), which showed how to convert a particular interactive zero-knowledge proof to a NIZK. We follow their approach, but we start with a different interactive zero-knowledge proof. This leads to an improvement compared to their work in several ways, in particular in terms of both assumptions and efficiency. In the second paper in this thesis, we study the property of subversion zero-knowledge in non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs. It is impossible to create a NIZK without relying on a common reference string (CRS) generated by a trusted party. However, a NIZK with the subversion zero-knowledge property guarantees that no one learns any private information from the proof even if the CRS was generated dishonestly. In this paper, we create a new cryptographic primitive (verifiably-extractable one-way functions) and show how this primitive relates to NIZKs with subversion zero-knowledge.Doktorgradsavhandlin

The Hunting of the SNARK

The existence of succinct non-interactive arguments for NP (i.e., non-interactive computationally-sound proofs where the verifier\u27s work is essentially independent of the complexity of the NP nondeterministic verifier) has been an intriguing question for the past two decades. Other than CS proofs in the random oracle model [Micali, FOCS \u2794], the only existing candidate construction is based on an elaborate assumption that is tailored to a specific protocol [Di Crescenzo and Lipmaa, CiE \u2708]. We formulate a general and relatively natural notion of an \emph{extractable collision-resistant hash function (ECRH)} and show that, if ECRHs exist, then a modified version of Di Crescenzo and Lipmaa\u27s protocol is a succinct non-interactive argument for NP. Furthermore, the modified protocol is actually a succinct non-interactive \emph{adaptive argument of knowledge (SNARK).} We then propose several candidate constructions for ECRHs and relaxations thereof. We demonstrate the applicability of SNARKs to various forms of delegation of computation, to succinct non-interactive zero knowledge arguments, and to succinct two-party secure computation. Finally, we show that SNARKs essentially imply the existence of ECRHs, thus demonstrating the necessity of the assumption. Going beyond \ECRHs, we formulate the notion of {\em extractable one-way functions (\EOWFs)}. Assuming the existence of a natural variant of \EOWFs, we construct a $2$-message selective-opening-attack secure commitment scheme and a 3-round zero-knowledge argument of knowledge. Furthermore, if the \EOWFs are concurrently extractable, the 3-round zero-knowledge protocol is also concurrent zero-knowledge. Our constructions circumvent previous black-box impossibility results regarding these protocols by relying on \EOWFs as the non-black-box component in the security reductions

Formalizing group blind signatures and practical constructions without random oracles

Group blind signatures combine anonymity properties of both group signatures and blind signatures and offer privacy for both the message to be signed and the signer. The primitive has been introduced with only informal definitions for its required security properties. In this paper, we offer two main contributions: first, we provide foundations for the primitive and present formal security definitions. In the process, we identify and address some subtle issues which were not considered by previous constructions and (informal) security definitions. Our second main contribution is a generic construction that yields practical schemes with a round-optimal signing protocol and constant-size signatures. Our constructions permit dynamic and concurrent enrollment of new members and satisfy strong security requirements. To the best of our knowledge, our schemes are the first provably secure constructions in the standard model. In addition, we introduce some new building blocks which may be of independent interest. © 2013 Springer-Verlag

From Obfuscation to the Security of Fiat-Shamir for Proofs

The Fiat-Shamir paradigm [CRYPTO\u2786] is a heuristic for converting three-round identification schemes into signature schemes, and more generally, for collapsing rounds in constant-round public-coin interactive protocols. This heuristic is very popular both in theory and in practice, and its security has been the focus of extensive study. In particular, this paradigm was shown to be secure in the so-called Random Oracle Model. However, in the plain model, mainly negative results were shown. In particular, this heuristic was shown to be insecure when applied to computationally sound proofs (also known as arguments). Moreover, recently it was shown that even in the restricted setting where the heuristic is applied to interactive proofs (as opposed to arguments), its soundness cannot be proven via a black-box reduction to any so-called falsifiable assumption. In this work, we give a positive result for the security of this paradigm in the plain model. Specifically, we construct a hash function for which the Fiat Shamir paradigm is secure when applied to proofs (as opposed to arguments), assuming the existence of a sub-exponentially secure indistinguishability obfuscator, the existence of an exponentially secure input-hiding obfuscator for the class of multi-bit point functions, and the existence of a sub-exponentially secure one-way function. While the hash function we construct is far from practical, we believe that this is a first step towards instantiations that are both more efficient and provably secure. In addition, we show that this result resolves a long-lasting open problem in the study of zero-knowledge proofs: It implies that there does not exist a public-coin constant-round zero-knowledge proof with negligible soundness (under the assumptions stated above)