SCREEN: Learning a Flat Syntactic and Semantic Spoken Language Analysis Using Artificial Neural Networks

In this paper, we describe a so-called screening approach for learning robust processing of spontaneously spoken language. A screening approach is a flat analysis which uses shallow sequences of category representations for analyzing an utterance at various syntactic, semantic and dialog levels. Rather than using a deeply structured symbolic analysis, we use a flat connectionist analysis. This screening approach aims at supporting speech and language processing by using (1) data-driven learning and (2) robustness of connectionist networks. In order to test this approach, we have developed the SCREEN system which is based on this new robust, learned and flat analysis. In this paper, we focus on a detailed description of SCREEN's architecture, the flat syntactic and semantic analysis, the interaction with a speech recognizer, and a detailed evaluation analysis of the robustness under the influence of noisy or incomplete input. The main result of this paper is that flat representations allow more robust processing of spontaneous spoken language than deeply structured representations. In particular, we show how the fault-tolerance and learning capability of connectionist networks can support a flat analysis for providing more robust spoken-language processing within an overall hybrid symbolic/connectionist framework.Comment: 51 pages, Postscript. To be published in Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 6(1), 199

DeepASL: Enabling Ubiquitous and Non-Intrusive Word and Sentence-Level Sign Language Translation

There is an undeniable communication barrier between deaf people and people with normal hearing ability. Although innovations in sign language translation technology aim to tear down this communication barrier, the majority of existing sign language translation systems are either intrusive or constrained by resolution or ambient lighting conditions. Moreover, these existing systems can only perform single-sign ASL translation rather than sentence-level translation, making them much less useful in daily-life communication scenarios. In this work, we fill this critical gap by presenting DeepASL, a transformative deep learning-based sign language translation technology that enables ubiquitous and non-intrusive American Sign Language (ASL) translation at both word and sentence levels. DeepASL uses infrared light as its sensing mechanism to non-intrusively capture the ASL signs. It incorporates a novel hierarchical bidirectional deep recurrent neural network (HB-RNN) and a probabilistic framework based on Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) for word-level and sentence-level ASL translation respectively. To evaluate its performance, we have collected 7,306 samples from 11 participants, covering 56 commonly used ASL words and 100 ASL sentences. DeepASL achieves an average 94.5% word-level translation accuracy and an average 8.2% word error rate on translating unseen ASL sentences. Given its promising performance, we believe DeepASL represents a significant step towards breaking the communication barrier between deaf people and hearing majority, and thus has the significant potential to fundamentally change deaf people's lives

An Emergent Approach to Text Analysis Based on a Connectionist Model and the Web

In this paper, we present a method to provide proactive assistance in text checking, based on usage relationships between words structuralized on the Web. For a given sentence, the method builds a connectionist structure of relationships between word n-grams. Such structure is then parameterized by means of an unsupervised and language agnostic optimization process. Finally, the method provides a representation of the sentence that allows emerging the least prominent usage-based relational patterns, helping to easily find badly-written and unpopular text. The study includes the problem statement and its characterization in the literature, as well as the proposed solving approach and some experimental use

Handwriting recognition by using deep learning to extract meaningful features

[EN] Recent improvements in deep learning techniques show that deep models can extract more meaningful data directly from raw signals than conventional parametrization techniques, making it possible to avoid specific feature extraction in the area of pattern recognition, especially for Computer Vision or Speech tasks. In this work, we directly use raw text line images by feeding them to Convolutional Neural Networks and deep Multilayer Perceptrons for feature extraction in a Handwriting Recognition system. The proposed recognition system, based on Hidden Markov Models that are hybridized with Neural Networks, has been tested with the IAM Database, achieving a considerable improvement.Work partially supported by the Spanish MINECO and FEDER founds under project TIN2017-85854-C4-2-R.Pastor Pellicer, J.; Castro-Bleda, MJ.; España Boquera, S.; Zamora-Martinez, FJ. (2019). Handwriting recognition by using deep learning to extract meaningful features. AI Communications. 32(2):101-112. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-170562S101112322Baldi, P., Brunak, S., Frasconi, P., Soda, G., & Pollastri, G. (1999). Exploiting the past and the future in protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics, 15(11), 937-946. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/15.11.937LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444. doi:10.1038/nature14539Bertolami, R., & Bunke, H. (2008). Hidden Markov model-based ensemble methods for offline handwritten text line recognition. Pattern Recognition, 41(11), 3452-3460. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2008.04.003Bianne-Bernard, A.-L., Menasri, F., Mohamad, R. A.-H., Mokbel, C., Kermorvant, C., & Likforman-Sulem, L. (2011). Dynamic and Contextual Information in HMM Modeling for Handwritten Word Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 33(10), 2066-2080. doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.22C.M. Bishop, Neural networks for pattern recognition, Oxford University Press, 1995.T. Bluche, H. Ney and C. Kermorvant, Feature extraction with convolutional neural networks for handwritten word recognition, in: 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), 2013, pp. 285–289.T. Bluche, H. Ney and C. Kermorvant, Tandem HMM with convolutional neural network for handwritten word recognition, in: 38th International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2013, pp. 2390–2394.T. Bluche, H. Ney and C. Kermorvant, A comparison of sequence-trained deep neural networks and recurrent neural networks optical modeling for handwriting recognition, in: Slsp-2014, 2014, pp. 1–12.H. Bourlard and N. Morgan, Connectionist Speech Recognition – A Hybrid Approach, Series in Engineering and Computer Science, Vol. 247, Kluwer Academic, 1994.Bozinovic, R. M., & Srihari, S. N. (1989). Off-line cursive script word recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(1), 68-83. doi:10.1109/34.23114H. Bunke, Recognition of cursive roman handwriting – past, present and future, in: International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Vol. 1, 2003, pp. 448–459.E. Caillault, C. Viard-Gaudin and A. Rahim Ahmad, MS-TDNN with global discriminant trainings, in: International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), 2005, pp. 856–860.P. Doetsch, M. Kozielski and H. Ney, Fast and robust training of recurrent neural networks for offline handwriting recognition, in: 14th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR), 2014, pp. 279–284.P. Dreuw, P. Doetsch, C. Plahl and H. Ney, Hierarchical hybrid MLP/HMM or rather MLP features for a discriminatively trained Gaussian HMM: A comparison for offline handwriting recognition, in: International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2011, pp. 3541–3544.Dreuw, P., Heigold, G., & Ney, H. (2011). Confidence- and margin-based MMI/MPE discriminative training for off-line handwriting recognition. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR), 14(3), 273-288. doi:10.1007/s10032-011-0160-xEspaña-Boquera, S., Castro-Bleda, M. J., Gorbe-Moya, J., & Zamora-Martinez, F. (2011). Improving Offline Handwritten Text Recognition with Hybrid HMM/ANN Models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 33(4), 767-779. doi:10.1109/tpami.2010.141A. Graves, S. Fernández, F. Gomez and J. Schmidhuber, Connectionist temporal classification: Labelling unsegmented sequence data with recurrent neural networks, in: 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), ACM, 2006, pp. 369–376.A. Graves and N. Jaitly, Towards end-to-end speech recognition with recurrent neural networks, in: 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2014, pp. 1764–1772.Graves, A., Liwicki, M., Fernandez, S., Bertolami, R., Bunke, H., & Schmidhuber, J. (2009). A Novel Connectionist System for Unconstrained Handwriting Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31(5), 855-868. doi:10.1109/tpami.2008.137A. Graves and J. Schmidhuber, Framewise phoneme classification with bidirectional LSTM networks, in: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Vol. 4, 2005, pp. 2047–2052.A. Graves and J. Schmidhuber, Offline handwriting recognition with multidimensional recurrent neural networks, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2009, pp. 545–552.F. Grézl, M. Karafiát, S. Kontár and J. Černocký, Probabilistic and bottle-neck features for LVCSR of meetings, in: International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Vol. 4, 2007.Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735-1780. doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735Impedovo, S. (2014). More than twenty years of advancements on Frontiers in handwriting recognition. Pattern Recognition, 47(3), 916-928. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2013.05.027Jaeger, S., Manke, S., Reichert, J., & Waibel, A. (2001). Online handwriting recognition: the NPen++ recognizer. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, 3(3), 169-180. doi:10.1007/pl00013559M. Kozielski, P. Doetsch and H. Ney, Improvements in RWTH’s system for off-line handwriting recognition, in: 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), IEEE, 2013, pp. 935–939.A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever and G.E. Hinton, ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), F. Pereira, C.J.C. Burges, L. Bottou and K.Q. Weinberger, eds, Vol. 25, Curran Associates, Inc., 2012, pp. 1097–1105.Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998). Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11), 2278-2324. doi:10.1109/5.726791M. Liwicki, A. Graves, H. Bunke and J. Schmidhuber, A novel approach to on-line handwriting recognition based on bidirectional long short-term memory networks, in: 9th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), 2007, pp. 367–371.Marti, U.-V., & Bunke, H. (2002). The IAM-database: an English sentence database for offline handwriting recognition. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, 5(1), 39-46. doi:10.1007/s100320200071S. Marukatat, T. Artieres, R. Gallinari and B. Dorizzi, Sentence recognition through hybrid neuro-Markovian modeling, in: 6th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), 2001, pp. 731–735.F.J. Och, Minimum error rate training in statistical machine translation, in: 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL’03, Vol. 1, 2003, pp. 160–167.J. Pastor-Pellicer, S. España-Boquera, M.J. Castro-Bleda and F. Zamora-Martínez, A combined convolutional neural network and dynamic programming approach for text line normalization, in: 13th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), 2015.J. Pastor-Pellicer, S. España-Boquera, F. Zamora-Martínez, M. Zeshan Afzal and M.J. Castro-Bleda, Insights on the use of convolutional neural networks for document image binarization, in: The International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Vol. 9095, 2015, pp. 115–126.V. Pham, T. Bluche, C. Kermorvant and J. Louradour, Dropout improves recurrent neural networks for handwriting recognition, in: International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR), 2014, pp. 285–290.Plamondon, R., & Srihari, S. N. (2000). Online and off-line handwriting recognition: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(1), 63-84. doi:10.1109/34.824821Plötz, T., & Fink, G. A. (2009). Markov models for offline handwriting recognition: a survey. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR), 12(4), 269-298. doi:10.1007/s10032-009-0098-4A. Poznanski and L. Wolf, CNN-N-gram for HandwritingWord recognition, in: Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 2305–2314.Puigcerver, J. (2017). Are Multidimensional Recurrent Layers Really Necessary for Handwritten Text Recognition? 2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR). doi:10.1109/icdar.2017.20L.R. Rabiner, A Tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and Selected Applications in Speech Recognition, 1989.Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., … Fei-Fei, L. (2015). ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge. International Journal of Computer Vision, 115(3), 211-252. doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-yT.N. Sainath, B. Kingsbury and B. Ramabhadran, Auto-encoder bottleneck features using deep belief networks, in: International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2012, pp. 4153–4156.Sayre, K. M. (1973). Machine recognition of handwritten words: A project report. Pattern Recognition, 5(3), 213-228. doi:10.1016/0031-3203(73)90044-7Schenkel, M., Guyon, I., & Henderson, D. (1995). On-line cursive script recognition using time-delay neural networks and hidden Markov models. Machine Vision and Applications, 8(4), 215-223. doi:10.1007/bf01219589Schuster, M., & Paliwal, K. K. (1997). Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 45(11), 2673-2681. doi:10.1109/78.650093A.W. Senior and A.J. Robinson, An off-line cursive handwriting recognition system, in: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 20, 1998, pp. 309–321.E. Singer and R.P. Lippman, A speech recognizer using radial basis function neural networks in an HMM framework, in: International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Vol. 1, IEEE, 1992, pp. 629–632.J. Stadermann, A hybrid SVM/HMM acoustic modeling approach to automatic speech recognition, in: International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), 2004.A. Stolcke, SRILM: An extensible language modeling toolkit, in: International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), 2002, pp. 901–904.C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, V. Vanhoucke and A. Rabinovich, Going deeper with convolutions, in: Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2015, pp. 1–12.TOSELLI, A. H., JUAN, A., GONZÁLEZ, J., SALVADOR, I., VIDAL, E., CASACUBERTA, F., … NEY, H. (2004). INTEGRATED HANDWRITING RECOGNITION AND INTERPRETATION USING FINITE-STATE MODELS. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 18(04), 519-539. doi:10.1142/s0218001404003344Toselli, A. H., Romero, V., Pastor, M., & Vidal, E. (2010). Multimodal interactive transcription of text images. Pattern Recognition, 43(5), 1814-1825. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2009.11.019J.M. Vilar, Efficient computation of confidence intervals for word error rates, in: International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2008, pp. 5101–5104.Vinciarelli, A. (2002). A survey on off-line Cursive Word Recognition. Pattern Recognition, 35(7), 1433-1446. doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(01)00129-7Voigtlaender, P., Doetsch, P., & Ney, H. (2016). Handwriting Recognition with Large Multidimensional Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks. 2016 15th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR). doi:10.1109/icfhr.2016.0052E. Wang, Q. Zhang, B. Shen, G. Zhang, X. Lu, Q. Wu and Y. Wang, Intel math kernel library, in: High-Performance Computing on the Intel® Xeon Phi™, Springer, 2014, pp. 167–188.F. Zamora-Martínez et al., April-ANN Toolkit, a Pattern Recognizer in Lua, Artificial Neural Networks Module, 2013, https://github.com/pakozm/ [github.com]april-ann.Zamora-Martínez, F., Frinken, V., España-Boquera, S., Castro-Bleda, M. J., Fischer, A., & Bunke, H. (2014). Neural network language models for off-line handwriting recognition. Pattern Recognition, 47(4), 1642-1652. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2013.10.020Zeyer, A., Beck, E., Schlüter, R., & Ney, H. (2017). CTC in the Context of Generalized Full-Sum HMM Training. Interspeech 2017. doi:10.21437/interspeech.2017-107