Diseño para operabilidad: Una revisión de enfoques y estrategias de solución

In the last decades the chemical engineering scientific research community has largely addressed the design-foroperability problem. Such an interest responds to the fact that the operability quality of a process is determined by design, becoming evident the convenience of considering operability issues in early design stages rather than later when the impact of modifications is less effective and more expensive. The necessity of integrating design and operability is dictated by the increasing complexity of the processes as result of progressively stringent economic, quality, safety and environmental constraints. Although the design-for-operability problem concerns to practically every technical discipline, it has achieved a particular identity within the chemical engineering field due to the economic magnitude of the involved processes. The work on design and analysis for operability in chemical engineering is really vast and a complete review in terms of papers is beyond the scope of this contribution. Instead, two major approaches will be addressed and those papers that in our belief had the most significance to the development of the field will be described in some detail.En las últimas décadas, la comunidad científica de ingeniería química ha abordado intensamente el problema de diseño-para-operabilidad. Tal interés responde al hecho de que la calidad operativa de un proceso esta determinada por diseño, resultando evidente la conveniencia de considerar aspectos operativos en las etapas tempranas del diseño y no luego, cuando el impacto de las modificaciones es menos efectivo y más costoso. La necesidad de integrar diseño y operabilidad esta dictada por la creciente complejidad de los procesos como resultado de las cada vez mayores restricciones económicas, de calidad de seguridad y medioambientales. Aunque el problema de diseño para operabilidad concierne a prácticamente toda disciplina, ha adquirido una identidad particular dentro de la ingeniería química debido a la magnitud económica de los procesos involucrados. El trabajo sobre diseño y análisis para operabilidad es realmente vasto y una revisión completa en términos de artículos supera los alcances de este trabajo. En su lugar, se discutirán los dos enfoques principales y aquellos artículos que en nuestra opinión han tenido mayor impacto para el desarrollo de la disciplina serán descriptos con cierto detalle.Fil: Blanco, Anibal Manuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; ArgentinaFil: Bandoni, Jose Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; Argentin

A fuzzy multiobjective algorithm for multiproduct batch plant: Application to protein production

This paper addresses the problem of the optimal design of batch plants with imprecise demands and proposes an alternative treatment of the imprecision by using fuzzy concepts. For this purpose, we extended a multiobjective genetic algorithm (MOGA) developed in previousworks, taking into account simultaneously maximization of the net present value (NPV) and two other performance criteria, i.e. the production delay/advance and a flexibility criterion. The former is computed by comparing the fuzzy computed production time to a given fuzzy production time horizon and the latter is based on the additional fuzzy demand that the plant is able to produce. The methodology provides a set of scenarios that are helpful to the decision’s maker and constitutes a very promising framework for taken imprecision into account in new product development stage

Multiobjective Multiproduct Batch Plant Design Under Uncertainty

This paper addresses the problem of the optimal design of batch plants with imprecise demands and proposes an alternative treatment of the imprecision by using fuzzy concepts. For this purpose, we extended a multiobjective genetic algorithm developed in previous works, taking into account simultaneously maximization of the net present value (NPV) and two other performance criteria, i.e. the production delay/advance and a flexibility criterion. The former is computed by comparing the fuzzy computed production time to a given fuzzy production time horizon and the latter is based on the additional fuzzy demand that the plant is able to produce. The methodology provides a set of scenarios that are helpful to the decision’s maker and constitutes a very promising framework for taken imprecision into account in new product development stage

Solution strategies to the stochastic design of mineral flotation plants

The aim of this study is two-fold: first, to analyze the effect of stochastic uncertainty in the design of flotation circuits and second, to analyze different strategies for the solution of a two-stage stochastic problem applied to a copper flotation circuit. The paper begins by introducing a stochastic optimization problem whose aim is to find the best configuration of superstructure, equipment design and operational conditions, such as residence time and stream flows. Variability is considered in the copper price and ore grade. This variability is represented by scenarios with their respective probability of occurrence. The resulting optimization problem is a two-stage stochastic mixed integer nonlinear program (TS-MINLP), which can be extremely challenging to solve. For this reason, several solvers for this problem are compared and two stochastic programming methodologies are applied. The combination of these techniques allows the production of high quality solutions and an analysis of their sensitivity to epistemic uncertainty. The results show that the stochastic problem gives better designs because it allows operational parameters to adapt to the uncertainty of the parameters. The results also show that the flotation circuit structure can vary with the feed grade and copper price. The sensitivity analysis shows small to moderate variability with epistemically uncertain parameters

Integrated design and control of chemical processes : part I : revision and clasification

[EN] This work presents a comprehensive classification of the different methods and procedures for integrated synthesis, design and control of chemical processes, based on a wide revision of recent literature. This classification fundamentally differentiates between “projecting methods”, where controllability is monitored during the process design to predict the trade-offs between design and control, and the “integrated-optimization methods” which solve the process design and the control-systems design at once within an optimization framework. The latter are revised categorizing them according to the methods to evaluate controllability and other related properties, the scope of the design problem, the treatment of uncertainties and perturbations, and finally, the type the optimization problem formulation and the methods for its resolution.[ES] Este trabajo presenta una clasificación integral de los diferentes métodos y procedimientos para la síntesis integrada, diseño y control de procesos químicos. Esta clasificación distingue fundamentalmente entre los "métodos de proyección", donde se controla la controlabilidad durante el diseño del proceso para predecir los compromisos entre diseño y control, y los "métodos de optimización integrada" que resuelven el diseño del proceso y el diseño de los sistemas de control a la vez dentro de un marco de optimización. Estos últimos se revisan clasificándolos según los métodos para evaluar la controlabilidad y otras propiedades relacionadas, el alcance del problema de diseño, el tratamiento de las incertidumbres y las perturbaciones y, finalmente, el tipo de la formulación del problema de optimización y los métodos para su resolución

Review of mathematical models for production planning under uncertainty due to lack of homogeneity: proposal of a conceptual model

[EN] Lack of homogeneity in the product (LHP) appears in some production processes that confer heterogeneity in the characteristics of the products obtained. Supply chains with this issue have to classify the product in different homogeneous subsets, whose quantity is uncertain during the production planning process. This paper proposes a generic framework for reviewing in a unified way the literature about production planning models dealing with LHP uncertainty. This analysis allows the identification of similarities among sectors to transfer solutions between them and gaps existing in the literature for further research. The results of the review show: (1) sectors affected by LHP inherent uncertainty, (2) the inherent LHP uncertainty types modelled, and (3) the approaches for modelling LHP uncertainty most widely employed. Finally, we suggest a conceptual model reflecting the aspects to be considered when modelling the production planning in sectors with LHP in an uncertain environment.This research was initiated within the framework of the project funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad [Ref. DPI2011-23597] entitled ‘Methods and models for operations planning and order management in supply chains characterised by uncertainty in production due to the lack of product uniformity’ (PLANGES-FHP) already finished. After, the project leading to this application has received funding from the European Union’s research and innovation programme under the H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions with the grant agreement No 691249, Project entitled ’Enhancing and implementing Knowledge based ICT solutions within high Riskand Uncertain Conditions for Agriculture Production Systems’ (RUC-APS).Mundi, I.; Alemany Díaz, MDM.; Poler, R.; Fuertes-Miquel, VS. (2019). Review of mathematical models for production planning under uncertainty due to lack of homogeneity: proposal of a conceptual model. International Journal of Production Research. 57(15-16):5239-5283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1566665S523952835715-16Ahumada, O., Rene Villalobos, J., & Nicholas Mason, A. (2012). Tactical planning of the production and distribution of fresh agricultural products under uncertainty. Agricultural Systems, 112, 17-26. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2012.06.002Ahumada, O., & Villalobos, J. R. (2009). Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(1), 1-20. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.014Alarcón, F., Alemany, M. M. E., Lario, F. C., & Oltra, R. F. (2011). La falta de homogeneidad del producto (FHP) en las empresas cerámicas y su impacto en la reasignación del inventario. Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio, 50(1), 49-58. doi:10.3989/cyv.072011Albornoz, V. M., M. González-Araya, M. C. Gripe, and S. V. Rodrıguez. 2014. “A Mixed Integer Linear Program for Operational Planning in a Meat Packing Plant.” Accessed January 15, 2015. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Victor_Albornoz/publication/268687089_A_Mixed_Integer_Linear_Program_for_Operational_Planning_in_a_Meat_Packing_Plant/links/547382bf0cf29afed60f55c7.pdf.José Alem, D., & Morabito, R. (2012). Production planning in furniture settings via robust optimization. Computers & Operations Research, 39(2), 139-150. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2011.02.022Alemany, M. M. E., Lario, F.-C., Ortiz, A., & Gómez, F. (2013). Available-To-Promise modeling for multi-plant manufacturing characterized by lack of homogeneity in the product: An illustration of a ceramic case. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(5), 3380-3398. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2012.07.022Alemany, M., Ortiz, A., & Fuertes-Miquel, V. S. (2018). A decision support tool for the order promising process with product homogeneity requirements in hybrid Make-To-Stock and Make-To-Order environments. Application to a ceramic tile company. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 122, 219-234. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2018.05.040Alfalla-Luque, R., Medina-Lopez, C., & Dey, P. K. (2012). Supply chain integration framework using literature review. Production Planning & Control, 24(8-9), 800-817. doi:10.1080/09537287.2012.666870Al-Othman, W. B. E., Lababidi, H. M. S., Alatiqi, I. M., & Al-Shayji, K. (2008). Supply chain optimization of petroleum organization under uncertainty in market demands and prices. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(3), 822-840. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.081Al-Shammari, A., & Ba-Shammakh, M. S. (2011). Uncertainty Analysis for Refinery Production Planning. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 50(11), 7065-7072. doi:10.1021/ie200313rAmaro, A. C. S., & Barbosa-Póvoa, A. P. F. D. (2009). The effect of uncertainty on the optimal closed-loop supply chain planning under different partnerships structure. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 33(12), 2144-2158. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.06.003ARAS, N., BOYACI, T., & VERTER, V. (2004). The effect of categorizing returned products in remanufacturing. IIE Transactions, 36(4), 319-331. doi:10.1080/07408170490279561Aydin, R., Kwong, C. K., Geda, M. W., & Okudan Kremer, G. E. (2017). Determining the optimal quantity and quality levels of used product returns for remanufacturing under multi-period and uncertain quality of returns. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(9-12), 4401-4414. doi:10.1007/s00170-017-1141-0Bakhrankova, K., Midthun, K. T., & Uggen, K. T. (2014). Stochastic optimization of operational production planning for fisheries. Fisheries Research, 157, 147-153. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2014.03.018Banasik, A., Kanellopoulos, A., Claassen, G. D. H., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., & van der Vorst, J. G. A. J. (2017). Closing loops in agricultural supply chains using multi-objective optimization: A case study of an industrial mushroom supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 409-420. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.012Beaudoin, D., LeBel, L., & Frayret, J.-M. (2007). Tactical supply chain planning in the forest products industry through optimization and scenario-based analysis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37(1), 128-140. doi:10.1139/x06-223Begen, M. A., & Puterman, M. L. (2003). Development Of A Catch Allocation Tool Design For Production Planning At Js Mcmillan Fisheries. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 41(3), 235-244. doi:10.1080/03155986.2003.11732678Benedito, E., & Corominas, A. (2010). Optimal manufacturing and remanufacturing capacities of systems with reverse logistics and deterministic uniform demand. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 3(1). doi:10.3926/jiem.2010.v3n1.p33-53Bertrand, J. W. ., & Rutten, W. G. M. . (1999). Evaluation of three production planning procedures for the use of recipe flexibility. European Journal of Operational Research, 115(1), 179-194. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00166-0Björheden, R., & Helstad, K. (2005). Raw Material Procurement in Sawmills’ Business Level Strategy-A Contingency Perspective. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 16(2), 47-56. doi:10.1080/14942119.2005.10702513Bohle, C., Maturana, S., & Vera, J. (2010). A robust optimization approach to wine grape harvesting scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 245-252. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.12.003Cai, X., Lai, M., Li, X., Li, Y., & Wu, X. (2014). Optimal acquisition and production policy in a hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing system with core acquisition at different quality levels. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2), 374-382. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.017Carneiro, M. C., Ribas, G. P., & Hamacher, S. (2010). Risk Management in the Oil Supply Chain: A CVaR Approach. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 49(7), 3286-3294. doi:10.1021/ie901265nChakraborty, M., & Chandra, M. K. (2005). Multicriteria decision making for optimal blending for beneficiation of coal: a fuzzy programming approach. Omega, 33(5), 413-418. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.07.005LUO, C., & RONG, G. (2009). A Strategy for the Integration of Production Planning and Scheduling in Refineries under Uncertainty. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 17(1), 113-127. doi:10.1016/s1004-9541(09)60042-2Davoli, G., Gallo, S., Collins, M., & Melloni, R. (2011). A stochastic simulation approach for production scheduling and investment planning in the tile industry. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 2(9). doi:10.4314/ijest.v2i9.64006Denizel, M., Ferguson, M., & Souza, G. (2010). Multiperiod Remanufacturing Planning With Uncertain Quality of Inputs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(3), 394-404. doi:10.1109/tem.2009.2024506Dong, M., Lu, S., & Han, S. (2011). Production Planning for Hybrid Remanufacturing and Manufacturing System with Component Recovery. Advances in Electrical Engineering and Electrical Machines, 511-518. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25905-0_66Dubois, D., Fargier, H., & Fortemps, P. (2003). Fuzzy scheduling: Modelling flexible constraints vs. coping with incomplete knowledge. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(2), 231-252. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00558-1DUENYAS, I., & TSAI, C.-Y. (2000). Control of a manufacturing system with random product yield and downward substitutability. IIE Transactions, 32(9), 785-795. doi:10.1080/07408170008967438Esteso, A., Alemany, M. M. E., & Ortiz, A. (2018). Conceptual framework for designing agri-food supply chains under uncertainty by mathematical programming models. International Journal of Production Research, 56(13), 4418-4446. doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1447706French, M. L., & LaForge, R. L. (2005). Closed-loop supply chains in process industries: An empirical study of producer re-use issues. Journal of Operations Management, 24(3), 271-286. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.07.012Gallo, M., R. Grisi, G. Guizzi, and E. Romano. 2009. “A Comparison of Production Policies in Remanufacturing Systems,” Proceedings of the 8th WSEAS International Conference on System Science and Simulation in Engineering, ICOSSSE ‘09, pp. 334.Goodfellow, R., & Dimitrakopoulos, R. (2017). Simultaneous Stochastic Optimization of Mining Complexes and Mineral Value Chains. Mathematical Geosciences, 49(3), 341-360. doi:10.1007/s11004-017-9680-3Graves, S. C. (2010). Uncertainty and Production Planning. Planning Production and Inventories in the Extended Enterprise, 83-101. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6485-4_5Grillo, H., Alemany, M. M. E., Ortiz, A., & Fuertes-Miquel, V. S. (2017). Mathematical modelling of the order-promising process for fruit supply chains considering the perishability and subtypes of products. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 49, 255-278. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2017.04.037Guan, Z., & Philpott, A. B. (2011). A multistage stochastic programming model for the New Zealand dairy industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(2), 289-299. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.11.003Guide, V. D. R. (2000). Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs. Journal of Operations Management, 18(4), 467-483. doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(00)00034-6Gupta, V., & Grossmann, I. E. (2011). Solution strategies for multistage stochastic programming with endogenous uncertainties. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 35(11), 2235-2247. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.11.013Gupta, S., and Z. Nan. 2006. “‘Multiperiod Planning of Refinery Operations Under Market Uncertainty,’ AIChE Annual Meeting.” Conference Proceedings.Heckmann, I., Comes, T., & Nickel, S. (2015). A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling. Omega, 52, 119-132. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.004Heydari, J., & Ghasemi, M. (2018). A revenue sharing contract for reverse supply chain coordination under stochastic quality of returned products and uncertain remanufacturing capacity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 607-615. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.206Hovelaque, V., Duvaleix-Tréguer, S., & Cordier, J. (2009). Effects of constrained supply and price contracts on agricultural cooperatives. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(3), 769-780. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.08.005Hsieh, S., & Chiang, C.-C. (2001). Manufacturing-to-Sale Planning Model for Fuel Oil Production. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 18(4), 303-311. doi:10.1007/s001700170070Igarashi, M., de Boer, L., & Fet, A. M. (2013). What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(4), 247-263. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2013.06.001Jamshidi, M., & Osanloo, M. (2019). Reliability analysis of production schedule in multi-element deposits under grade-tonnage uncertainty with multi-destinations for the run of mine material. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 29(3), 483-489. doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.04.016Jin, X., Hu, S. J., Ni, J., & Xiao, G. (2013). Assembly Strategies for Remanufacturing Systems With Variable Quality Returns. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 10(1), 76-85. doi:10.1109/tase.2012.2217741Jindal, A., & Sangwan, K. S. (2016). Multi-objective fuzzy mathematical modelling of closed-loop supply chain considering economical and environmental factors. Annals of Operations Research, 257(1-2), 95-120. doi:10.1007/s10479-016-2219-zJohnson, P., G. Evatt, P. Duck, and S. Howell. 2010. “The Derivation and Impact of an Optimal Cut-off Grade Regime Upon Mine Valuations,” Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2010 Vol I.Junior, M. L., & Filho, M. G. (2011). Production planning and control for remanufacturing: literature review and analysis. Production Planning & Control, 23(6), 419-435. doi:10.1080/09537287.2011.561815Kamrad, B., & Ernst, R. (2001). An Economic Model for Evaluating Mining and Manufacturing Ventures with Output Yield Uncertainty. Operations Research, 49(5), 690-699. doi:10.1287/opre.49.5.690.10610Kannegiesser, M., Günther, H.-O., van Beek, P., Grunow, M., & Habla, C. (2008). Value chain management for commodities: a case study from the chemical industry. OR Spectrum, 31(1), 63-93. doi:10.1007/s00291-008-0124-9Karabuk, S. (2008). Production planning under uncertainty in textile manufacturing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(4), 510-520. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602370Khor, C. S., Elkamel, A., & Douglas, P. L. (2008). Stochastic Refinery Planning with Risk Management. Petroleum Science and Technology, 26(14), 1726-1740. doi:10.1080/10916460701287813Kumral, M. (2004). Genetic algorithms for optimization of a mine system under uncertainty. Production Planning & Control, 15(1), 34-41. doi:10.1080/09537280310001654844Lalmazloumian, M., and K. Y. Wong. 2012. “A Review of Modelling Approaches for Supply Chain Planning Under Uncertainty,” Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), 2012 9th International Conference on, pp. 197.Leiras, A., Ribas, G., Hamacher, S., & Elkamel, A. (2013). Tactical and Operational Planning of Multirefinery Networks under Uncertainty: An Iterative Integration Approach. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(25), 8507-8517. doi:10.1021/ie302835nLiao, H., Deng, Q., & Wang, Y. (2017). Optimal Acquisition and Production Policy for End-of-Life Engineering Machinery Recovering in a Joint Manufacturing/Remanufacturing System under Uncertainties in Procurement and Demand. Sustainability, 9(3), 338. doi:10.3390/su9030338Loomba, A. P. S., & Nakashima, K. (2011). Enhancing value in reverse supply chains by sorting before product recovery. Production Planning & Control, 23(2-3), 205-215. doi:10.1080/09537287.2011.591652Macedo, P. B., Alem, D., Santos, M., Junior, M. L., & Moreno, A. (2015). Hybrid manufacturing and remanufacturing lot-sizing problem with stochastic demand, return, and setup costs. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 82(5-8), 1241-1257. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7445-zMartinez, L. 2009. “Why Accounting for Uncertainty and Risk Can Improve Final Decision-Making in Strategic Open Pit Mine Evaluation.” Project Evaluation Conference, Melbourne, pp. 1.Matamoros, M. E. V., & Dimitrakopoulos, R. (2016). Stochastic short-term mine production schedule accounting for fleet allocation, operational considerations and blending restrictions. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(3), 911-921. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.050Meredith, J. (1993). Theory Building through Conceptual Methods. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13(5), 3-11. doi:10.1108/01443579310028120Miller, W. A., Leung, L. C., Azhar, T. M., & Sargent, S. (1997). Fuzzy production planning model for fresh tomato packing. International Journal of Production Economics, 53(3), 227-238. doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(97)00110-2Mitra, K. (2009). Multiobjective optimization of an industrial grinding operation under uncertainty. Chemical Engineering Science, 64(23), 5043-5056. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2009.08.012Moghaddam, K. S. (2015). Fuzzy multi-objective model for supplier selection and order allocation in reverse logistics systems under supply and demand uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(15-16), 6237-6254. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.010Mula, J., Peidro, D., Díaz-Madroñero, M., & Vicens, E. (2010). Mathematical programming models for supply chain production and transport planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 204(3), 377-390. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.008Mula, J., Peidro, D., & Poler, R. (2010). The effectiveness of a fuzzy mathematical programming approach for supply chain production planning with fuzzy demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 136-143. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.007MUNDI, I., ALEMANY, M. M. E., BOZA, A., & POLER, R. (2013). A Model-Driven Decision Support System for the Master Planning of Ceramic Supply Chains with Non-uniformity of Finished Goods. Studies in Informatics and Control, 22(2). doi:10.24846/v22i2y201305Mundi, M. I., Alemany, M. M. E., Poler, R., & Fuertes-Miquel, V. S. (2016). Fuzzy sets to model master production effectively in Make to Stock companies with Lack of Homogeneity in the Product. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 293, 95-112. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2015.06.009Munhoz, J. R., & Morabito, R. (2014). Optimization approaches to support decision making in the production planning of a citrus company: A Brazilian case study. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 107, 45-57. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2014.05.016Olivetti, E. A., Gaustad, G. G., Field, F. R., & Kirchain, R. E. (2011). Increasing Secondary and Renewable Material Use: A Chance Constrained Modeling Approach To Manage Feedstock Quality Variation. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(9), 4118-4126. doi:10.1021/es103486sOsmani, A., & Zhang, J. (2013). Stochastic optimization of a multi-feedstock lignocellulosic-based bioethanol supply chain under multiple uncertainties. Energy, 59, 157-172. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.07.043Paksoy, T., Pehlivan, N. Y., & Özceylan, E. (2012). Application of fuzzy optimization to a supply chain network design: A case study of an edible vegetable oils manufacturer. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(6), 2762-2776. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2011.09.060Pauls-Worm, K. G. J., Hendrix, E. M. T., Haijema, R., & van der Vorst, J. G. A. J. (2014). An MILP approximation for ordering perishable products with non-stationary demand and service level constraints. International Journal of Production Economics, 157, 133-146. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.07.020Peidro, D., Mula, J., Alemany, M. M. E., & Lario, F.-C. (2012). Fuzzy multi-objective optimisation for master planning in a ceramic supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11), 3011-3020. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.588267Peidro, D., Mula, J., Jiménez, M., & del Mar Botella, M. (2010). A fuzzy linear programming based approach for tactical supply chain planning in an uncertainty environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(1), 65-80. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.11.031Peidro, D., Mula, J., Poler, R., & Lario, F.-C. (2008). Quantitative models for supply chain planning under uncertainty: a review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 43(3-4), 400-420. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1715-yPendharkar, P. C. (1997). A fuzzy linear programming model for production planning in coal mines. Computers & Operations Research, 24(12), 1141-1149. doi:10.1016/s0305-0548(97)00024-5Pendharkar, P. C. (2013). Scatter search based interactive multi-criteria optimization of fuzzy objectives for coal production planning. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(5-6), 1503-1511. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2013.01.001Pieter van Donk, D. (2000). Customer‐driven manufacturing in the food processing industry. British Food Journal, 102(10), 739-747. doi:10.1108/00070700010362176Pitty, S. S., Li, W., Adhitya, A., Srinivasan, R., & Karimi, I. A. (2008). Decision support for integrated refinery supply chains. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 32(11), 2767-2786. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.11.006Poles, R., and F. Cheong. 2009. “A System Dynamics Model for Reducing Uncertainty in Remanufacturing Systems,” PACIS 2009–13th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: IT Services in a Global Environment.Pongsakdi, A., Rangsunvigit, P., Siemanond, K., & Bagajewicz, M. J. (2006). Financial risk management in the planning of refinery operations. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(1), 64-86. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.04.007Radulescu, M., G. Zbaganu, and C. Z. Radulescu. 2008. “Crop Planning in the Presence of Production Quotas (Invited Paper),” Computer Modeling and Simulation, 2008.UKSIM 2008. Tenth International Conference on, pp. 549.Rajaram, K., & Karmarkar, U. S. (2002). Product Cycling With Uncertain Yields: Analysis and Application to the Process Industry. Operations Research, 50(4), 680-691. doi:10.1287/opre.50.4.680.2867Ramasesh, R. V., &

A Novel Back-Off Algorithm for the Integration Between Dynamic Optimization and Scheduling of Batch Processes Under Uncertainty

This thesis presents a decomposition algorithm for obtaining robust scheduling and control decisions. It iteratively solves scheduling and dynamic optimization problems while approximating stochastic uncertainty through back-off terms, calculated through dynamic simulations of the process. This algorithm is compared, both in solution quality and performance, against a fully-integrated MINLP

Integrated batch process development based on mixed-logic dynamic optimization

Specialty chemicals industry relies on batch manufacturing, since it requires the frequent adaptation of production systems to market fluctuations. To be first in the market, batch industry requires decision-support systems for the rapid development and implementation of chemical processes. Moreover, the processes should be competitive to ensure their long-term viability. General-purpose and flexible plants and the consideration of physicochemical insights to define an efficient operation are also cornerstones for the success of specialty chemical industries. Precisely, this thesis tackles the systematic development of batch processes that are efficient, economically competitive, and environmentally friendly, to assist their agile introduction into production systems in grassroots and retrofit scenarios. Synthesis of conceptual processing schemes and plant allocation subproblems are solved simultaneously, taking into account the plant design. With this purpose, an optimization-based approach is proposed, where all structural alternatives are represented in a State-Equipment Network (SEN) superstructure, following formulated into a Mixed-Logic Dynamic Optimization (MLDO) problem which is later solved to minimize an objective function. Essentially, the strength of the proposed methodology lies in the modeling strategy which combines the different kinds of decisions of the integrated problem in a unique optimization model. Accordingly, it considers: (i) synthesis and allocation alternatives combination, (ii) dynamic process performance models and dynamic control variable profiles, (iii) discrete events associated to transitions of batch phases and operations, (iv) quantitative and qualitative information, (v) material transference synchronization to ensure batch integrity between unit procedures, and (vi) batch and semicontinuous processing elements. Different strategies can be used to solve the resulting MLDO problem. A deterministic direct-simultaneous approach is first proposed. The mixed-logic problem is reformulated into a mixed-integer one, which is fully-discretized to provide a Mixed-Integer Non-Linear Programming (MINLP) that is optimized using conventional solvers. Then, a Differential Genetic Algorithm (DGA) and a hybrid approach are presented. The purpose of these evolutionary strategies is to pose solution alternatives that keep solution goodness while seek for the improvement of computational efficiency to handle industrial-size problems. The optimization-based approach is applied in retrofit scenarios to solve the simultaneous process synthesis and plant allocation, taking into account the physical restrictions of existing plant elements. The production of specialty chemicals based on a competitive reactions system in an existing reactor network is first defined through process development and improvement according to different economic scenarios, decision criteria, and plant modifications. Additionally, a photo-Fenton process is optimized to eliminate an emergent wastewater pollutant in a given pilot plant, pursuing the minimization of processing time and cost. Batch process development in grassroots scenarios is also proven to be a problem of utmost importance to deal with uncertainty in future markets. Seeking for plant flexibility in several demand scenarios, the expected profit is maximized through a two-stage stochastic formulation that includes simultaneous plant design, process synthesis, and plant allocation decisions. A heuristic solution algorithm is used to handle the problem complexity. A grassroots plant design is defined to implement the previous competitive reaction system, where decisions like the feed-forward trajectories or operating modes allow the adaptation of master recipes to different demands. Finally, an acrylic fiber production example is presented to illustrate process development decisions like the selection of tasks, technological alternatives, chemicals, and solvent reuse.La indústria de productes químics especials es basa en la fabricació discontinua, ja que permet adaptar de forma freqüent els sistemes de producció en funció de les fluctuacions de mercat. Per ser líder al sector, són necessàries eines de suport a la decisió que ajudin a l’àgil desenvolupament i implementació de nous processos. A més, aquests han de ser competitius per garantir la seva viabilitat a llarg termini. Altres peces clau per una operació eficient són l’ús de plantes flexibles així com l’estudi dels fenòmens fisicoquímics. Aquesta tesis aborda justament el desenvolupament sistemàtic de processos químics discontinus que siguin eficients, econòmicament competitius i ecològics, per contribuir a la seva ràpida introducció en els sistemes de producció, tant en escenaris de plantes existents com des de les bases. En concret, es planteja la resolució simultània de la síntesi conceptual d’esquemes de procés i l’assignació d’equips, tenint en compte el disseny de la planta. Amb aquest objectiu, es proposa una metodologia de solució basada en optimització, on les alternatives estructurals es representen en una Xarxa d’Estats i Equips (SEN per les sigles en anglès) que es formula mitjançant un problema d’Optimització Dinàmica Mixta-Lògica (MLDO per les sigles en anglès) que es resol minimitzant una funció objectiu. La solidesa de la metodologia proposada rau en la estratègia de modelat del problema MLDO, que integra els diferents tipus de decisions en un sol model d’optimització. En concret, es consideren: (i) la combinació d’alternatives de síntesi i assignació d’equips, (ii) models de procés i trajectòries de control dinàmics, (iii) esdeveniments discrets associats al canvi de fase i operació, (iv) informació quantitativa i qualitativa, (v) sincronització de transferències de material en tasques consecutives, i (vi) elements de processat discontinus i semi-continus. Existeixen diverses estratègies per resoldre el problema MLDO resultant. En aquesta tesi es proposa en primer lloc un mètode determinístic directe-simultani, on el model mixt-lògic es transforma en un mixt-enter. Aquest es discretitza al seu torn de forma completa per obtenir un problema de Programació No-Lineal Mixta-Entera (MINLP per les sigles en anglès) el qual es pot resoldre utilitzant algoritmes d’optimització convencionals. A més, es presenten un Algoritme Genètic Diferencial (DGA per les sigles en anglès) i un mètode híbrid. Totes dues estratègies esdevenen alternatives de cerca amb l’objectiu de mantenir la bondat de la solució i millorar l’eficàcia de computació per tractar problemes de dimensió industrial. La metodologia de solució proposada s’aplica al desenvolupament de processos discontinus en escenaris de plantes existents, tenint en compte les restriccions físiques dels equips. Un primer exemple aborda la manufactura de productes químics basada en un sistema de reaccions competitives. Concretament, es desenvolupa i millora el procés de producció implementat en una xarxa de reactors considerant diferents escenaris econòmics, criteris de decisió, i modificacions de planta. En un segon exemple, s’optimitza el procés foto-Fenton per ser executat en una planta pilot per eliminar contaminants emergents. Buscant integrar el desenvolupament de procés i el disseny de plantes flexibles en escenaris de base, es presenta una formulació estocàstica en dues etapes per a optimitzar el benefici esperat d’acord a diversos escenaris de demanda. Per gestionar la complexitat d’aquest problema es proposa la utilització d’una heurística. Com a exemple, es planteja el disseny d’una planta de base on implementar l’anterior sistema de reaccions competitives. Decisions com les trajectòries dinàmiques de control o la configuració d’equips permeten adaptar la recepta màster en funció de la demanda. Un darrer exemple defineix el procés de producció de fibra acrílica, il·lustrant decisions com la selecció de tasques, tecnologia, reactius o reutilització de dissolvents.La industria productos químicos especiales se basa en la fabricación discontinua, la cual permite la adaptación frecuente de los sistemas de producción en función de las fluctuaciones de mercado. Para ser líder en el sector, son necesarias herramientas de soporte a la decisión que contribuyan al ágil desarrollo e implementación de nuevos procesos. Además, éstos deben ser competitivos para garantizar su viabilidad a largo plazo. Otras piezas clave para una operación eficiente son la utilización de plantas flexibles y el estudio de los fenómenos fisicoquímicos. Esta tesis aborda justamente el desarrollo sistemático de procesos químicos discontinuos que sean eficientes, económicamente competitivos y ecológicos, para contribuir a su rápida introducción en los sistemas de producción, ya sea en escenarios de plantas existentes o desde las bases. En particular, se plantea la resoluciónsimultánea de la síntesis conceptual de esquemas de proceso y la asignación de equipos, teniendo en cuenta además el diseño de planta.Con este fin, se propone una metodología de solución basada en optimización, donde todas las alternativas estructurales se representan en una Red de Estados y Equipos (SENpor sus siglas en inglés) que se formula mediante un problema de Optimización Dinámica Mixta-Lógica (MLDO por sus siglas en inglés) que se resuelve minimizando una función objetivo. La solidez de la metodología propuesta reside en la estrategia de modelado delproblema MLDO, que integra los diferentes tipos de decisiones en un solo modelo de optimización. En concreto, se consideran: (i) la combinación de alternativas de síntesis y asignación de equipos, (ii) modelos de proceso y trayectorias de control dinámicos, (iii)eventos discretos asociados al cambio de fase y operación, (iv) información cuantitativa y cualitativa, (v) sincronización de la transferencia de material en tareas consecutivas, y(vi) elementos de procesado discontinuos y semicontinuos.Existen diversas estrategias para resolver el problema MLDO resultante. En esta tesis se propone en primer lugar un método determinístico directo-simultáneo, donde el problema mixto-lógico se reformula en un mixto-entero. A su vez, éste se discretiza de formacompleta para obtener un problema de Programación No-Lineal Mixta-Entera (MINLP por sus siglas en inglés) el cual se puede resolver mediante algoritmos de optimización convencionales. Además, se presentan un Algoritmo Genético Diferencial (DGA por sussiglas en inglés) y un método híbrido. Ambas estrategias se plantean como alternativas de búsqueda con objeto de mantener la bondad de la solución y mejorar la eficacia de computación para tratar problemas de dimensión industrial.La metodología de solución propuesta se aplica al desarrollo de procesos discontinuos en escenarios con plantas existentes, teniendo en cuenta las restricciones físicas de los equipos. Un primer ejemplo aborda la fabricación de productos químicos basada en un sistema de reacciones competitivas. En concreto, se desarrolla y mejora el proceso de producción a implementar en una red de reactores considerando diferentes escenarios económicos, criterios de decisión, y modificaciones de planta. En un segundo ejemplo,se optimiza el proceso foto-Fenton a ser ejecutado en una planta piloto para eliminar contaminantes emergentes.Persiguiendo la integración del desarrollo de proceso con el diseño de plantas flexi-bles en escenarios base, se presenta asimismo una formulación estocástica en dos etapas para optimizar el beneficio esperado de acuerdo a varios escenarios de demanda. Paramanejar la complejidad de dicho problema se propone la utilización de una heurística.Como ejemplo, se plantea el diseño de una planta de base para implementar el anterior sistema de reacciones competitivas, donde decisiones como las trayectorias dinámicas de control o la configuración de equipos permiten adaptar la receta máster en función de lademandas. Por último, se presenta un ejemplo donde se define el proceso de producción de fibra acrílica, ilustrando decisiones como la selección de tareas, alternativas tecnológicas, reactivos químicos o la reutilización de disolventes.Postprint (published version