Computing simplicial representatives of homotopy group elements

A central problem of algebraic topology is to understand the homotopy groups $\pi_d(X)$ of a topological space $X$. For the computational version of the problem, it is well known that there is no algorithm to decide whether the fundamental group $\pi_1(X)$ of a given finite simplicial complex $X$ is trivial. On the other hand, there are several algorithms that, given a finite simplicial complex $X$ that is simply connected (i.e., with $\pi_1(X)$ trivial), compute the higher homotopy group $\pi_d(X)$ for any given $d\geq 2$. %The first such algorithm was given by Brown, and more recently, \v{C}adek et al. However, these algorithms come with a caveat: They compute the isomorphism type of $\pi_d(X)$, $d\geq 2$ as an \emph{abstract} finitely generated abelian group given by generators and relations, but they work with very implicit representations of the elements of $\pi_d(X)$. Converting elements of this abstract group into explicit geometric maps from the $d$-dimensional sphere $S^d$ to $X$ has been one of the main unsolved problems in the emerging field of computational homotopy theory. Here we present an algorithm that, given a~simply connected space $X$, computes $\pi_d(X)$ and represents its elements as simplicial maps from a suitable triangulation of the $d$-sphere $S^d$ to $X$. For fixed $d$, the algorithm runs in time exponential in $size(X)$, the number of simplices of $X$. Moreover, we prove that this is optimal: For every fixed $d\geq 2$, we construct a family of simply connected spaces $X$ such that for any simplicial map representing a generator of $\pi_d(X)$, the size of the triangulation of $S^d$ on which the map is defined, is exponential in $size(X)$

Homotopy Type of the Boolean Complex of a Coxeter System

In any Coxeter group, the set of elements whose principal order ideals are boolean forms a simplicial poset under the Bruhat order. This simplicial poset defines a cell complex, called the boolean complex. In this paper it is shown that, for any Coxeter system of rank n, the boolean complex is homotopy equivalent to a wedge of (n-1)-dimensional spheres. The number of such spheres can be computed recursively from the unlabeled Coxeter graph, and defines a new graph invariant called the boolean number. Specific calculations of the boolean number are given for all finite and affine irreducible Coxeter systems, as well as for systems with graphs that are disconnected, complete, or stars. One implication of these results is that the boolean complex is contractible if and only if a generator of the Coxeter system is in the center of the group. of these results is that the boolean complex is contractible if and only if a generator of the Coxeter system is in the center of the group.Comment: final version, to appear in Advances in Mathematic

The Relative Power of Composite Loop Agreement Tasks

Loop agreement is a family of wait-free tasks that includes set agreement and simplex agreement, and was used to prove the undecidability of wait-free solvability of distributed tasks by read/write memory. Herlihy and Rajsbaum defined the algebraic signature of a loop agreement task, which consists of a group and a distinguished element. They used the algebraic signature to characterize the relative power of loop agreement tasks. In particular, they showed that one task implements another exactly when there is a homomorphism between their respective signatures sending one distinguished element to the other. In this paper, we extend the previous result by defining the composition of multiple loop agreement tasks to create a new one with the same combined power. We generalize the original algebraic characterization of relative power to compositions of tasks. In this way, we can think of loop agreement tasks in terms of their basic building blocks. We also investigate a category-theoretic perspective of loop agreement by defining a category of loops, showing that the algebraic signature is a functor, and proving that our definition of task composition is the "correct" one, in a categorical sense.Comment: 18 page

The homology of the Higman-Thompson groups

We prove that Thompson's group $V$ is acyclic, answering a 1992 question of Brown in the positive. More generally, we identify the homology of the Higman-Thompson groups $V_{n,r}$ with the homology of the zeroth component of the infinite loop space of the mod $n-1$ Moore spectrum. As $V = V_{2,1}$, we can deduce that this group is acyclic. Our proof involves establishing homological stability with respect to $r$, as well as a computation of the algebraic K-theory of the category of finitely generated free Cantor algebras of any type $n$.Comment: 49 page

Algebraic Topology

The chapter provides an introduction to the basic concepts of Algebraic Topology with an emphasis on motivation from applications in the physical sciences. It finishes with a brief review of computational work in algebraic topology, including persistent homology.Comment: This manuscript will be published as Chapter 5 in Wiley's textbook \emph{Mathematical Tools for Physicists}, 2nd edition, edited by Michael Grinfeld from the University of Strathclyd