747 research outputs found

    Computing Real Roots of Real Polynomials ... and now For Real!

    Full text link
    Very recent work introduces an asymptotically fast subdivision algorithm, denoted ANewDsc, for isolating the real roots of a univariate real polynomial. The method combines Descartes' Rule of Signs to test intervals for the existence of roots, Newton iteration to speed up convergence against clusters of roots, and approximate computation to decrease the required precision. It achieves record bounds on the worst-case complexity for the considered problem, matching the complexity of Pan's method for computing all complex roots and improving upon the complexity of other subdivision methods by several magnitudes. In the article at hand, we report on an implementation of ANewDsc on top of the RS root isolator. RS is a highly efficient realization of the classical Descartes method and currently serves as the default real root solver in Maple. We describe crucial design changes within ANewDsc and RS that led to a high-performance implementation without harming the theoretical complexity of the underlying algorithm. With an excerpt of our extensive collection of benchmarks, available online at http://anewdsc.mpi-inf.mpg.de/, we illustrate that the theoretical gain in performance of ANewDsc over other subdivision methods also transfers into practice. These experiments also show that our new implementation outperforms both RS and mature competitors by magnitudes for notoriously hard instances with clustered roots. For all other instances, we avoid almost any overhead by integrating additional optimizations and heuristics.Comment: Accepted for presentation at the 41st International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (ISSAC), July 19--22, 2016, Waterloo, Ontario, Canad

    Computing Real Roots of Real Polynomials

    Full text link
    Computing the roots of a univariate polynomial is a fundamental and long-studied problem of computational algebra with applications in mathematics, engineering, computer science, and the natural sciences. For isolating as well as for approximating all complex roots, the best algorithm known is based on an almost optimal method for approximate polynomial factorization, introduced by Pan in 2002. Pan's factorization algorithm goes back to the splitting circle method from Schoenhage in 1982. The main drawbacks of Pan's method are that it is quite involved and that all roots have to be computed at the same time. For the important special case, where only the real roots have to be computed, much simpler methods are used in practice; however, they considerably lag behind Pan's method with respect to complexity. In this paper, we resolve this discrepancy by introducing a hybrid of the Descartes method and Newton iteration, denoted ANEWDSC, which is simpler than Pan's method, but achieves a run-time comparable to it. Our algorithm computes isolating intervals for the real roots of any real square-free polynomial, given by an oracle that provides arbitrary good approximations of the polynomial's coefficients. ANEWDSC can also be used to only isolate the roots in a given interval and to refine the isolating intervals to an arbitrary small size; it achieves near optimal complexity for the latter task.Comment: to appear in the Journal of Symbolic Computatio

    A Near-Optimal Algorithm for Computing Real Roots of Sparse Polynomials

    Full text link
    Let p∈Z[x]p\in\mathbb{Z}[x] be an arbitrary polynomial of degree nn with kk non-zero integer coefficients of absolute value less than 2τ2^\tau. In this paper, we answer the open question whether the real roots of pp can be computed with a number of arithmetic operations over the rational numbers that is polynomial in the input size of the sparse representation of pp. More precisely, we give a deterministic, complete, and certified algorithm that determines isolating intervals for all real roots of pp with O(k3⋅log⁥(nτ)⋅log⁥n)O(k^3\cdot\log(n\tau)\cdot \log n) many exact arithmetic operations over the rational numbers. When using approximate but certified arithmetic, the bit complexity of our algorithm is bounded by O~(k4⋅nτ)\tilde{O}(k^4\cdot n\tau), where O~(⋅)\tilde{O}(\cdot) means that we ignore logarithmic. Hence, for sufficiently sparse polynomials (i.e. k=O(log⁥c(nτ))k=O(\log^c (n\tau)) for a positive constant cc), the bit complexity is O~(nτ)\tilde{O}(n\tau). We also prove that the latter bound is optimal up to logarithmic factors

    Novel Approach to Real Polynomial Root-finding and Matrix Eigen-solving

    Full text link
    Univariate polynomial root-finding is both classical and important for modern computing. Frequently one seeks just the real roots of a polynomial with real coefficients. They can be approximated at a low computational cost if the polynomial has no nonreal roots, but typically nonreal roots are much more numerous than the real ones. We dramatically accelerate the known algorithms in this case by exploiting the correlation between the computations with matrices and polynomials, extending the techniques of the matrix sign iteration, and exploiting the structure of the companion matrix of the input polynomial. We extend some of the proposed techniques to the approximation of the real eigenvalues of a real nonsymmetric matrix.Comment: 17 pages, added algorithm

    Roots of bivariate polynomial systems via determinantal representations

    Get PDF
    We give two determinantal representations for a bivariate polynomial. They may be used to compute the zeros of a system of two of these polynomials via the eigenvalues of a two-parameter eigenvalue problem. The first determinantal representation is suitable for polynomials with scalar or matrix coefficients, and consists of matrices with asymptotic order n2/4n^2/4, where nn is the degree of the polynomial. The second representation is useful for scalar polynomials and has asymptotic order n2/6n^2/6. The resulting method to compute the roots of a system of two bivariate polynomials is competitive with some existing methods for polynomials up to degree 10, as well as for polynomials with a small number of terms.Comment: 22 pages, 9 figure
    • 

    corecore