Selected papers from the 15th and 16th international conference on Computational Intelligence Methods for Bioinformatics and Biostatistics

Funding Information: CIBB 2019 was held at the Department of Human and Social Sciences of the University of Bergamo, Italy, from the 4th to the 6th of September 2019 []. The organization of this edition of CIBB was supported by the Department of Informatics, Systems and Communication of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy, and by the Institute of Biomedical Technologies of the National Research Council, Italy. Besides the papers focused on computational intelligence methods applied to open problems of bioinformatics and biostatistics, the works submitted to CIBB 2019 dealt with algebraic and computational methods to study RNA behaviour, intelligence methods for molecular characterization and dynamics in translational medicine, modeling and simulation methods for computational biology and systems medicine, and machine learning in healthcare informatics and medical biology. A supplement published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making journal [] collected three revised and extended papers focused on the latter topic.publishersversionpublishe

Legal, ethical and social impact on the use of computational intelligence based systems for land border crossings

This paper provides an overview on the most relevant legal, ethical and social implications arising from the use of computational intelligence based systems for land border crossings. Based on the automatic deception detection system (ADDS) developed in the iBorderCtrl project, issues such as the peculiarities of the interaction of humans with machines, profiling, automated decision-making and the risk of false positives can be identified and demonstrate how computational intelligence based systems can challenge fundamental legal and ethical principles. These include in particular the right to privacy, human dignity and the principle of non-discrimination. By further analysing the various issues, this paper seeks to provide some thoughts on remedies and safeguards which should be considered when developing computational intelligence based systems.© 2018 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.EC/H2020/700626/E

Trust-Based Techniques for Collective Intelligence in Social Search Systems.

A key-issue for the effectiveness of collaborative decision support systems is the problem of the trustworthiness of the entities involved in the process. Trust has been always used by humans as a form of collective intelligence to support effective decision making process. Computational trust models are becoming now a popular technique across many applications such as cloud computing, p2p networks, wikis, e-commerce sites, social network. The chapter provides an overview of the current landscape of computational models of trust and reputation, and it presents an experimental study case in the domain of social search, where we show how trust techniques can be applied to enhance the quality of social search engine predictions

When artificial intelligence meets educational leaders’ data-informed decision-making: A cautionary tale

Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to a type of algorithms or computerized systems that resemble human mental processes of decision making. Drawing upon multidisciplinary literature that intersects AI, decision making, educational leadership, and policymaking, this position paper aims to examine promising applications and potential perils of AI in educational leaders’ data-informed decision making (DIDM). Endowed with ever-growing computational power and real-time data, highly scalable AI can increase efficiency and accuracy in leaders’ DIDM. However, misusing AI can have perilous effects on education stakeholders. Many lurking biases in current AI could be amplified. Of more concern, the moral values (e.g., fairness, equity, honesty, and doing no harm) we uphold might clash with using AI to make data-informed decisions. Further, missteps on the issues about data security and privacy could have a life-long impact on stakeholders. The article concludes with recommendations for educational leaders to leverage AI potential and minimize its negative consequences