1,104 research outputs found
Optimizing a Certified Proof Checker for a Large-Scale Computer-Generated Proof
In recent work, we formalized the theory of optimal-size sorting networks
with the goal of extracting a verified checker for the large-scale
computer-generated proof that 25 comparisons are optimal when sorting 9 inputs,
which required more than a decade of CPU time and produced 27 GB of proof
witnesses. The checker uses an untrusted oracle based on these witnesses and is
able to verify the smaller case of 8 inputs within a couple of days, but it did
not scale to the full proof for 9 inputs. In this paper, we describe several
non-trivial optimizations of the algorithm in the checker, obtained by
appropriately changing the formalization and capitalizing on the symbiosis with
an adequate implementation of the oracle. We provide experimental evidence of
orders of magnitude improvements to both runtime and memory footprint for 8
inputs, and actually manage to check the full proof for 9 inputs.Comment: IMADA-preprint-c
Applying Formal Methods to Networking: Theory, Techniques and Applications
Despite its great importance, modern network infrastructure is remarkable for
the lack of rigor in its engineering. The Internet which began as a research
experiment was never designed to handle the users and applications it hosts
today. The lack of formalization of the Internet architecture meant limited
abstractions and modularity, especially for the control and management planes,
thus requiring for every new need a new protocol built from scratch. This led
to an unwieldy ossified Internet architecture resistant to any attempts at
formal verification, and an Internet culture where expediency and pragmatism
are favored over formal correctness. Fortunately, recent work in the space of
clean slate Internet design---especially, the software defined networking (SDN)
paradigm---offers the Internet community another chance to develop the right
kind of architecture and abstractions. This has also led to a great resurgence
in interest of applying formal methods to specification, verification, and
synthesis of networking protocols and applications. In this paper, we present a
self-contained tutorial of the formidable amount of work that has been done in
formal methods, and present a survey of its applications to networking.Comment: 30 pages, submitted to IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorial
Formal verification in Coq of program properties involving the global state effect
The syntax of an imperative language does not mention explicitly the state,
while its denotational semantics has to mention it. In this paper we present a
framework for the verification in Coq of properties of programs manipulating
the global state effect. These properties are expressed in a proof system which
is close to the syntax, as in effect systems, in the sense that the state does
not appear explicitly in the type of expressions which manipulate it. Rather,
the state appears via decorations added to terms and to equations. In this
system, proofs of programs thus present two aspects: properties can be verified
{\em up to effects} or the effects can be taken into account. The design of our
Coq library consequently reflects these two aspects: our framework is centered
around the construction of two inductive and dependent types, one for terms up
to effects and one for the manipulation of decorations
Learning to Prove Theorems via Interacting with Proof Assistants
Humans prove theorems by relying on substantial high-level reasoning and
problem-specific insights. Proof assistants offer a formalism that resembles
human mathematical reasoning, representing theorems in higher-order logic and
proofs as high-level tactics. However, human experts have to construct proofs
manually by entering tactics into the proof assistant. In this paper, we study
the problem of using machine learning to automate the interaction with proof
assistants. We construct CoqGym, a large-scale dataset and learning environment
containing 71K human-written proofs from 123 projects developed with the Coq
proof assistant. We develop ASTactic, a deep learning-based model that
generates tactics as programs in the form of abstract syntax trees (ASTs).
Experiments show that ASTactic trained on CoqGym can generate effective tactics
and can be used to prove new theorems not previously provable by automated
methods. Code is available at https://github.com/princeton-vl/CoqGym.Comment: Accepted to ICML 201
TRX: A Formally Verified Parser Interpreter
Parsing is an important problem in computer science and yet surprisingly
little attention has been devoted to its formal verification. In this paper, we
present TRX: a parser interpreter formally developed in the proof assistant
Coq, capable of producing formally correct parsers. We are using parsing
expression grammars (PEGs), a formalism essentially representing recursive
descent parsing, which we consider an attractive alternative to context-free
grammars (CFGs). From this formalization we can extract a parser for an
arbitrary PEG grammar with the warranty of total correctness, i.e., the
resulting parser is terminating and correct with respect to its grammar and the
semantics of PEGs; both properties formally proven in Coq.Comment: 26 pages, LMC
- …