3,163 research outputs found
On the Computability of Solomonoff Induction and Knowledge-Seeking
Solomonoff induction is held as a gold standard for learning, but it is known
to be incomputable. We quantify its incomputability by placing various flavors
of Solomonoff's prior M in the arithmetical hierarchy. We also derive
computability bounds for knowledge-seeking agents, and give a limit-computable
weakly asymptotically optimal reinforcement learning agent.Comment: ALT 201
Bad Universal Priors and Notions of Optimality
A big open question of algorithmic information theory is the choice of the
universal Turing machine (UTM). For Kolmogorov complexity and Solomonoff
induction we have invariance theorems: the choice of the UTM changes bounds
only by a constant. For the universally intelligent agent AIXI (Hutter, 2005)
no invariance theorem is known. Our results are entirely negative: we discuss
cases in which unlucky or adversarial choices of the UTM cause AIXI to
misbehave drastically. We show that Legg-Hutter intelligence and thus balanced
Pareto optimality is entirely subjective, and that every policy is Pareto
optimal in the class of all computable environments. This undermines all
existing optimality properties for AIXI. While it may still serve as a gold
standard for AI, our results imply that AIXI is a relative theory, dependent on
the choice of the UTM.Comment: COLT 201
Computable lower bounds for deterministic parameter estimation
This paper is primarily tutorial in nature and presents a simple approach(norm minimization under linear constraints) for deriving computable lower bounds on the MSE of deterministic parameter estimators with a clear interpretation of the bounds. We also address the issue of lower bounds tightness in comparison with the MSE of ML estimators and their ability to predict the SNR threshold region. Last, as many practical estimation problems must be regarded as joint detection-estimation problems, we remind that the estimation performance must be conditional on detection performance, leading to the open problem of the fundamental limits of the joint detectionestimation performance
POWERPLAY: Training an Increasingly General Problem Solver by Continually Searching for the Simplest Still Unsolvable Problem
Most of computer science focuses on automatically solving given computational
problems. I focus on automatically inventing or discovering problems in a way
inspired by the playful behavior of animals and humans, to train a more and
more general problem solver from scratch in an unsupervised fashion. Consider
the infinite set of all computable descriptions of tasks with possibly
computable solutions. The novel algorithmic framework POWERPLAY (2011)
continually searches the space of possible pairs of new tasks and modifications
of the current problem solver, until it finds a more powerful problem solver
that provably solves all previously learned tasks plus the new one, while the
unmodified predecessor does not. Wow-effects are achieved by continually making
previously learned skills more efficient such that they require less time and
space. New skills may (partially) re-use previously learned skills. POWERPLAY's
search orders candidate pairs of tasks and solver modifications by their
conditional computational (time & space) complexity, given the stored
experience so far. The new task and its corresponding task-solving skill are
those first found and validated. The computational costs of validating new
tasks need not grow with task repertoire size. POWERPLAY's ongoing search for
novelty keeps breaking the generalization abilities of its present solver. This
is related to Goedel's sequence of increasingly powerful formal theories based
on adding formerly unprovable statements to the axioms without affecting
previously provable theorems. The continually increasing repertoire of problem
solving procedures can be exploited by a parallel search for solutions to
additional externally posed tasks. POWERPLAY may be viewed as a greedy but
practical implementation of basic principles of creativity. A first
experimental analysis can be found in separate papers [53,54].Comment: 21 pages, additional connections to previous work, references to
first experiments with POWERPLA
Towards a Universal Theory of Artificial Intelligence based on Algorithmic Probability and Sequential Decision Theory
Decision theory formally solves the problem of rational agents in uncertain
worlds if the true environmental probability distribution is known.
Solomonoff's theory of universal induction formally solves the problem of
sequence prediction for unknown distribution. We unify both theories and give
strong arguments that the resulting universal AIXI model behaves optimal in any
computable environment. The major drawback of the AIXI model is that it is
uncomputable. To overcome this problem, we construct a modified algorithm
AIXI^tl, which is still superior to any other time t and space l bounded agent.
The computation time of AIXI^tl is of the order t x 2^l.Comment: 8 two-column pages, latex2e, 1 figure, submitted to ijca
Free Lunch for Optimisation under the Universal Distribution
Function optimisation is a major challenge in computer science. The No Free
Lunch theorems state that if all functions with the same histogram are assumed
to be equally probable then no algorithm outperforms any other in expectation.
We argue against the uniform assumption and suggest a universal prior exists
for which there is a free lunch, but where no particular class of functions is
favoured over another. We also prove upper and lower bounds on the size of the
free lunch
Coding-theorem Like Behaviour and Emergence of the Universal Distribution from Resource-bounded Algorithmic Probability
Previously referred to as `miraculous' in the scientific literature because
of its powerful properties and its wide application as optimal solution to the
problem of induction/inference, (approximations to) Algorithmic Probability
(AP) and the associated Universal Distribution are (or should be) of the
greatest importance in science. Here we investigate the emergence, the rates of
emergence and convergence, and the Coding-theorem like behaviour of AP in
Turing-subuniversal models of computation. We investigate empirical
distributions of computing models in the Chomsky hierarchy. We introduce
measures of algorithmic probability and algorithmic complexity based upon
resource-bounded computation, in contrast to previously thoroughly investigated
distributions produced from the output distribution of Turing machines. This
approach allows for numerical approximations to algorithmic
(Kolmogorov-Chaitin) complexity-based estimations at each of the levels of a
computational hierarchy. We demonstrate that all these estimations are
correlated in rank and that they converge both in rank and values as a function
of computational power, despite fundamental differences between computational
models. In the context of natural processes that operate below the Turing
universal level because of finite resources and physical degradation, the
investigation of natural biases stemming from algorithmic rules may shed light
on the distribution of outcomes. We show that up to 60\% of the
simplicity/complexity bias in distributions produced even by the weakest of the
computational models can be accounted for by Algorithmic Probability in its
approximation to the Universal Distribution.Comment: 27 pages main text, 39 pages including supplement. Online complexity
calculator: http://complexitycalculator.com
- …