Prospects and limitations of full-text index structures in genome analysis

The combination of incessant advances in sequencing technology producing large amounts of data and innovative bioinformatics approaches, designed to cope with this data flood, has led to new interesting results in the life sciences. Given the magnitude of sequence data to be processed, many bioinformatics tools rely on efficient solutions to a variety of complex string problems. These solutions include fast heuristic algorithms and advanced data structures, generally referred to as index structures. Although the importance of index structures is generally known to the bioinformatics community, the design and potency of these data structures, as well as their properties and limitations, are less understood. Moreover, the last decade has seen a boom in the number of variant index structures featuring complex and diverse memory-time trade-offs. This article brings a comprehensive state-of-the-art overview of the most popular index structures and their recently developed variants. Their features, interrelationships, the trade-offs they impose, but also their practical limitations, are explained and compared

RLZAP: Relative Lempel-Ziv with Adaptive Pointers

Relative Lempel-Ziv (RLZ) is a popular algorithm for compressing databases of genomes from individuals of the same species when fast random access is desired. With Kuruppu et al.'s (SPIRE 2010) original implementation, a reference genome is selected and then the other genomes are greedily parsed into phrases exactly matching substrings of the reference. Deorowicz and Grabowski (Bioinformatics, 2011) pointed out that letting each phrase end with a mismatch character usually gives better compression because many of the differences between individuals' genomes are single-nucleotide substitutions. Ferrada et al. (SPIRE 2014) then pointed out that also using relative pointers and run-length compressing them usually gives even better compression. In this paper we generalize Ferrada et al.'s idea to handle well also short insertions, deletions and multi-character substitutions. We show experimentally that our generalization achieves better compression than Ferrada et al.'s implementation with comparable random-access times

Entropy-scaling search of massive biological data

Many datasets exhibit a well-defined structure that can be exploited to design faster search tools, but it is not always clear when such acceleration is possible. Here, we introduce a framework for similarity search based on characterizing a dataset's entropy and fractal dimension. We prove that searching scales in time with metric entropy (number of covering hyperspheres), if the fractal dimension of the dataset is low, and scales in space with the sum of metric entropy and information-theoretic entropy (randomness of the data). Using these ideas, we present accelerated versions of standard tools, with no loss in specificity and little loss in sensitivity, for use in three domains---high-throughput drug screening (Ammolite, 150x speedup), metagenomics (MICA, 3.5x speedup of DIAMOND [3,700x BLASTX]), and protein structure search (esFragBag, 10x speedup of FragBag). Our framework can be used to achieve "compressive omics," and the general theory can be readily applied to data science problems outside of biology.Comment: Including supplement: 41 pages, 6 figures, 4 tables, 1 bo

Efficient Storage of Genomic Sequences in High Performance Computing Systems

ABSTRACT: In this dissertation, we address the challenges of genomic data storage in high performance computing systems. In particular, we focus on developing a referential compression approach for Next Generation Sequence data stored in FASTQ format files. The amount of genomic data available for researchers to process has increased exponentially, bringing enormous challenges for its efficient storage and transmission. General-purpose compressors can only offer limited performance for genomic data, thus the need for specialized compression solutions. Two trends have emerged as alternatives to harness the particular properties of genomic data: non-referential and referential compression. Non-referential compressors offer higher compression rations than general purpose compressors, but still below of what a referential compressor could theoretically achieve. However, the effectiveness of referential compression depends on selecting a good reference and on having enough computing resources available. This thesis presents one of the first referential compressors for FASTQ files. We first present a comprehensive analytical and experimental evaluation of the most relevant tools for genomic raw data compression, which led us to identify the main needs and opportunities in this field. As a consequence, we propose a novel compression workflow that aims at improving the usability of referential compressors. Subsequently, we discuss the implementation and performance evaluation for the core of the proposed workflow: a referential compressor for reads in FASTQ format that combines local read-to-reference alignments with a specialized binary-encoding strategy. The compression algorithm, named UdeACompress, achieved very competitive compression ratios when compared to the best compressors in the current state of the art, while showing reasonable execution times and memory use. In particular, UdeACompress outperformed all competitors when compressing long reads, typical of the newest sequencing technologies. Finally, we study the main aspects of the data-level parallelism in the Intel AVX-512 architecture, in order to develop a parallel version of the UdeACompress algorithms to reduce the runtime. Through the use of SIMD programming, we managed to significantly accelerate the main bottleneck found in UdeACompress, the Suffix Array Construction

Indexing large genome collections on a PC

Motivation: The availability of thousands of invidual genomes of one species should boost rapid progress in personalized medicine or understanding of the interaction between genotype and phenotype, to name a few applications. A key operation useful in such analyses is aligning sequencing reads against a collection of genomes, which is costly with the use of existing algorithms due to their large memory requirements. Results: We present MuGI, Multiple Genome Index, which reports all occurrences of a given pattern, in exact and approximate matching model, against a collection of thousand(s) genomes. Its unique feature is the small index size fitting in a standard computer with 16--32\,GB, or even 8\,GB, of RAM, for the 1000GP collection of 1092 diploid human genomes. The solution is also fast. For example, the exact matching queries are handled in average time of 39\,$\mu$s and with up to 3 mismatches in 373\,$\mu$s on the test PC with the index size of 13.4\,GB. For a smaller index, occupying 7.4\,GB in memory, the respective times grow to 76\,$\mu$s and 917\,$\mu$s. Availability: Software and Suuplementary material: \url{http://sun.aei.polsl.pl/mugi}

Computational biology in the 21st century

Computational biologists answer biological and biomedical questions by using computation in support of—or in place of—laboratory procedures, hoping to obtain more accurate answers at a greatly reduced cost. The past two decades have seen unprecedented technological progress with regard to generating biological data; next-generation sequencing, mass spectrometry, microarrays, cryo-electron microscopy, and other highthroughput approaches have led to an explosion of data. However, this explosion is a mixed blessing. On the one hand, the scale and scope of data should allow new insights into genetic and infectious diseases, cancer, basic biology, and even human migration patterns. On the other hand, researchers are generating datasets so massive that it has become difficult to analyze them to discover patterns that give clues to the underlying biological processes.National Institutes of Health. (U.S.) ( grant GM108348)Hertz Foundatio

Data compression for sequencing data

Post-Sanger sequencing methods produce tons of data, and there is a general agreement that the challenge to store and process them must be addressed with data compression. In this review we first answer the question “why compression” in a quantitative manner. Then we also answer the questions “what” and “how”, by sketching the fundamental compression ideas, describing the main sequencing data types and formats, and comparing the specialized compression algorithms and tools. Finally, we go back to the question “why compression” and give other, perhaps surprising answers, demonstrating the pervasiveness of data compression techniques in computational biology