A toolkit for model checking of electronic contracts

PhD ThesisIn the business world, contracts are used to regulate business interactions between trading parties. In this context, an electronic contracting systems can be used to monitor business–to–business interactions to ensure that they comply with the rights (permissions), obligations and prohibitions stipulated in contract clauses. Such an electronic contracting system will require an executable version of the contract (e-contract) for compliance checking. It is important to be verify the correctness properties of an e- contract before deploying it for compliance checking. Model checkers are widely used for automatic verification of concurrent systems. However, such tools for e-contracts with means for expressing directly and intu- itively key concepts that appear recurrently in contracts, such as execu- tions of business operations, granting (cancellation, suspension, fulfilment, violation, etc.) of rights, obligations and prohibitions to role players are not yet available. This thesis rectifies the situation by developing a high-level e-contract verification toolkit using the Spin model checker. A formal Contractual Business-To-Business interaction (CB2B) model based on the concepts of contract compliance checking developed earlier at Newcastle university has been constructed. Further, Promela, the input language of the Spin model checker, has been extended in a manner that enables specification of contract clauses in terms of contract entities: role players, business operations, rights, obligations and prohibitions. A given contract can now be expressed using extended Promela as a set of declarations and a set of Event-Condition-Action rules. In addition, the designer can specify the correctness requirements to be verified in Linear-Temporal-Logic directly in terms of the contract entities. A notable feature is that the CB2B model automatically checks for contract independent properties: properties that must hold for all contracts. For example, at run time, a contract should not simultaneously grant a role player a right to perform an operation and also prohibit it. Thus, the toolkit hides much of the intricate details of dealing with Promela processes communicating through channels and enables a designer to build verifiable abstract models directly in terms of contract entities. The usefulness of the toolkit is demonstrated by trying out a number of contract examples used by researchers working on contract verification. The thesis also shows how the toolkit can be used for generating test cases for testing an implemented system

Specifying and Verifying Contract-driven Composite Web Services: a Model Checking Approach

As a promising computing paradigm in the new era of cross-enterprise e-applications, web services technology works as plugin mode to provide a value-added to applications using Service-Oriented Computing (SOC) and Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA). Verification is an important issue in this paradigm, which focuses on abstract business contracts and where services’ behaviors are generally classified in terms of compliance with / violation of their contracts. However, proposed approaches fail to describe in details both compliance and violation behaviors, how the system can distinguish between them, and how the system reacts after each violation. In this context, specifying and automatically generating verification properties are challenging key issues. This thesis proposes a novel approach towards verifying the compliance with contracts regulating the composition of web services. In this approach, properties against which the system is verified are generated automatically from the composition’s implementation. First, Business Process Execution Language (BPEL)that specifies actions within business processes with web services is extended to create custom activities, called labels. Those labels are used as means to represent the specifications and mark the points the developer aims to verify. A significant advantage of this labeling is the ability to target specific points in the design to be verified, which makes this verification very focused. Second, new translation rules from the extended BPEL into ISPL, the input language of the MCMAS model checker, are provided so that model checking the behavior of our contract-driven compositions is possible. The verification properties are expressed in the CTLC logic, which provides a powerful representation for modeling composition contracts using commitment-based multiagent interactions. A detailed case study with experimental results are also reported ins the thesis

IUPC: Identification and Unification of Process Constraints

Business Process Compliance (BPC) has gained significant momentum in research and practice during the last years. Although many approaches address BPC, they mostly assume the existence of some kind of unified base of process constraints and focus on their verification over the business processes. However, it remains unclear how such an inte- grated process constraint base can be built up, even though this con- stitutes the essential prerequisite for all further compliance checks. In addition, the heterogeneity of process constraints has been neglected so far. Without identification and separation of process constraints from domain rules as well as unification of process constraints, the success- ful IT support of BPC will not be possible. In this technical report we introduce a unified representation framework that enables the identifica- tion of process constraints from domain rules and their later unification within a process constraint base. Separating process constraints from domain rules can lead to significant reduction of compliance checking effort. Unification enables consistency checks and optimizations as well as maintenance and evolution of the constraint base on the other side.Comment: 13 pages, 4 figures, technical repor

Tracking Chart 2006 H&M, China 440015386E

This document is part of a digital collection provided by the Martin P. Catherwood Library, ILR School, Cornell University, pertaining to the effects of globalization on the workplace worldwide. Special emphasis is placed on labor rights, working conditions, labor market changes, and union organizing.FLA_2006_H_M_TC_China_440015386E.pdf: 18 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020

Tracking Chart 2004 Nike, Thailand 10037487C

This document is part of a digital collection provided by the Martin P. Catherwood Library, ILR School, Cornell University, pertaining to the effects of globalization on the workplace worldwide. Special emphasis is placed on labor rights, working conditions, labor market changes, and union organizing.FLA_2004_Nike_TC_Thailand_10037487C.pdf: 22 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020

Tracking Chart 2004 Nordstrom, Thailand 10037487C

This document is part of a digital collection provided by the Martin P. Catherwood Library, ILR School, Cornell University, pertaining to the effects of globalization on the workplace worldwide. Special emphasis is placed on labor rights, working conditions, labor market changes, and union organizing.FLA_2004_Nordstrom_TC_Thailand_10037487C.pdf: 19 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020