452 research outputs found
Complexity of the Guarded Two-Variable Fragment with Counting Quantifiers
We show that the finite satisfiability problem for the guarded two-variable
fragment with counting quantifiers is in EXPTIME. The method employed also
yields a simple proof of a result recently obtained by Y. Kazakov, that the
satisfiability problem for the guarded two-variable fragment with counting
quantifiers is in EXPTIME.Comment: 20 pages, 3 figure
On the uniform one-dimensional fragment
The uniform one-dimensional fragment of first-order logic, U1, is a recently
introduced formalism that extends two-variable logic in a natural way to
contexts with relations of all arities. We survey properties of U1 and
investigate its relationship to description logics designed to accommodate
higher arity relations, with particular attention given to DLR_reg. We also
define a description logic version of a variant of U1 and prove a range of new
results concerning the expressivity of U1 and related logics
One-dimensional fragment of first-order logic
We introduce a novel decidable fragment of first-order logic. The fragment is
one-dimensional in the sense that quantification is limited to applications of
blocks of existential (universal) quantifiers such that at most one variable
remains free in the quantified formula. The fragment is closed under Boolean
operations, but additional restrictions (called uniformity conditions) apply to
combinations of atomic formulae with two or more variables. We argue that the
notions of one-dimensionality and uniformity together offer a novel perspective
on the robust decidability of modal logics. We also establish that minor
modifications to the restrictions of the syntax of the one-dimensional fragment
lead to undecidable formalisms. Namely, the two-dimensional and non-uniform
one-dimensional fragments are shown undecidable. Finally, we prove that with
regard to expressivity, the one-dimensional fragment is incomparable with both
the guarded negation fragment and two-variable logic with counting. Our proof
of the decidability of the one-dimensional fragment is based on a technique
involving a direct reduction to the monadic class of first-order logic. The
novel technique is itself of an independent mathematical interest
Querying the Guarded Fragment
Evaluating a Boolean conjunctive query Q against a guarded first-order theory
F is equivalent to checking whether "F and not Q" is unsatisfiable. This
problem is relevant to the areas of database theory and description logic.
Since Q may not be guarded, well known results about the decidability,
complexity, and finite-model property of the guarded fragment do not obviously
carry over to conjunctive query answering over guarded theories, and had been
left open in general. By investigating finite guarded bisimilar covers of
hypergraphs and relational structures, and by substantially generalising
Rosati's finite chase, we prove for guarded theories F and (unions of)
conjunctive queries Q that (i) Q is true in each model of F iff Q is true in
each finite model of F and (ii) determining whether F implies Q is
2EXPTIME-complete. We further show the following results: (iii) the existence
of polynomial-size conformal covers of arbitrary hypergraphs; (iv) a new proof
of the finite model property of the clique-guarded fragment; (v) the small
model property of the guarded fragment with optimal bounds; (vi) a
polynomial-time solution to the canonisation problem modulo guarded
bisimulation, which yields (vii) a capturing result for guarded bisimulation
invariant PTIME.Comment: This is an improved and extended version of the paper of the same
title presented at LICS 201
On Classical Decidable Logics Extended with Percentage Quantifiers and Arithmetics
During the last decades, a lot of effort was put into identifying decidable fragments of first-order logic. Such efforts gave birth, among the others, to the two-variable fragment and the guarded fragment, depending on the type of restriction imposed on formulae from the language. Despite the success of the mentioned logics in areas like formal verification and knowledge representation, such first-order fragments are too weak to express even the simplest statistical constraints, required for modelling of influence networks or in statistical reasoning.
In this work we investigate the extensions of these classical decidable logics with percentage quantifiers, specifying how frequently a formula is satisfied in the indented model. We show, surprisingly, that all the mentioned decidable fragments become undecidable under such extension, sharpening the existing results in the literature. Our negative results are supplemented by decidability of the two-variable guarded fragment with even more expressive counting, namely Presburger constraints. Our results can be applied to infer decidability of various modal and description logics, e.g. Presburger Modal Logics with Converse or ALCI, with expressive cardinality constraints
On two-variable guarded fragment logic with expressive local Presburger constraints
We consider the extension of two-variable guarded fragment logic with local
Presburger quantifiers. These are quantifiers that can express properties such
as ``the number of incoming blue edges plus twice the number of outgoing red
edges is at most three times the number of incoming green edges'' and captures
various description logics with counting, but without constant symbols. We show
that the satisfiability of this logic is EXP-complete. While the lower bound
already holds for the standard two-variable guarded fragment logic, the upper
bound is established by a novel, yet simple deterministic graph theoretic based
algorithm
A decidable policy language for history-based transaction monitoring
Online trading invariably involves dealings between strangers, so it is
important for one party to be able to judge objectively the trustworthiness of
the other. In such a setting, the decision to trust a user may sensibly be
based on that user's past behaviour. We introduce a specification language
based on linear temporal logic for expressing a policy for categorising the
behaviour patterns of a user depending on its transaction history. We also
present an algorithm for checking whether the transaction history obeys the
stated policy. To be useful in a real setting, such a language should allow one
to express realistic policies which may involve parameter quantification and
quantitative or statistical patterns. We introduce several extensions of linear
temporal logic to cater for such needs: a restricted form of universal and
existential quantification; arbitrary computable functions and relations in the
term language; and a "counting" quantifier for counting how many times a
formula holds in the past. We then show that model checking a transaction
history against a policy, which we call the history-based transaction
monitoring problem, is PSPACE-complete in the size of the policy formula and
the length of the history. The problem becomes decidable in polynomial time
when the policies are fixed. We also consider the problem of transaction
monitoring in the case where not all the parameters of actions are observable.
We formulate two such "partial observability" monitoring problems, and show
their decidability under certain restrictions
A Fine-Grained Hierarchy of Hard Problems in the Separated Fragment
Recently, the separated fragment (SF) has been introduced and proved to be
decidable. Its defining principle is that universally and existentially
quantified variables may not occur together in atoms. The known upper bound on
the time required to decide SF's satisfiability problem is formulated in terms
of quantifier alternations: Given an SF sentence
in which is quantifier free, satisfiability can be decided in
nondeterministic -fold exponential time. In the present paper, we conduct a
more fine-grained analysis of the complexity of SF-satisfiability. We derive an
upper and a lower bound in terms of the degree of interaction of existential
variables (short: degree)}---a novel measure of how many separate existential
quantifier blocks in a sentence are connected via joint occurrences of
variables in atoms. Our main result is the -NEXPTIME-completeness of the
satisfiability problem for the set of all SF sentences that have
degree or smaller. Consequently, we show that SF-satisfiability is
non-elementary in general, since SF is defined without restrictions on the
degree. Beyond trivial lower bounds, nothing has been known about the hardness
of SF-satisfiability so far.Comment: Full version of the LICS 2017 extended abstract having the same
title, 38 page
- …