Completeness of a relational calculus for program schemes

AbstractThe relational calculus MU was presented in Willem-Paul de Roever's dissertation as a framework for describing and proving properties of programs. MU is axiomatized by de Roever in stages. The next-to-last stage is the calculus MU2, namely MU without the recursive μ-operator. Its axioms include typed versions of Tarski's axioms for the calculus of relations, together with axioms for the projection functions. For MU there is, in addition, an axiom expressing the least-fixed-point property of terms containing the μ-operator, and Scott's induction rule. Thus MU2 is a calculus for nonrecursive program schemes. Around 1976 David Park conjectured that de Roever's axiomatization for MU2 is complete. In this paper, we confirm Park's conjecture

Middle-Out Reasoning for Logic Program Synthesis

We propose a novel approach to automating the synthesis of logic programs: Logic programs are synthesized as a by-product of the planning of a verification proof. The approach is a two-level one: At the object level, we prove program verification conjectures in a sorted, first-order theory. The conjectures are of the form 8args \Gamma\Gamma\Gamma\Gamma! : prog(args \Gamma\Gamma\Gamma\Gamma! ) $ spec(args \Gamma\Gamma\Gamma\Gamma! ). At the meta-level, we plan the object-level verification with an unspecified program definition. The definition is represented with a (second-order) meta-level variable, which becomes instantiated in the course of the planning

Lewis meets Brouwer: constructive strict implication

C. I. Lewis invented modern modal logic as a theory of "strict implication". Over the classical propositional calculus one can as well work with the unary box connective. Intuitionistically, however, the strict implication has greater expressive power than the box and allows to make distinctions invisible in the ordinary syntax. In particular, the logic determined by the most popular semantics of intuitionistic K becomes a proper extension of the minimal normal logic of the binary connective. Even an extension of this minimal logic with the "strength" axiom, classically near-trivial, preserves the distinction between the binary and the unary setting. In fact, this distinction and the strong constructive strict implication itself has been also discovered by the functional programming community in their study of "arrows" as contrasted with "idioms". Our particular focus is on arithmetical interpretations of the intuitionistic strict implication in terms of preservativity in extensions of Heyting's Arithmetic.Comment: Our invited contribution to the collection "L.E.J. Brouwer, 50 years later