7,100 research outputs found
First-Order Decomposition Trees
Lifting attempts to speed up probabilistic inference by exploiting symmetries
in the model. Exact lifted inference methods, like their propositional
counterparts, work by recursively decomposing the model and the problem. In the
propositional case, there exist formal structures, such as decomposition trees
(dtrees), that represent such a decomposition and allow us to determine the
complexity of inference a priori. However, there is currently no equivalent
structure nor analogous complexity results for lifted inference. In this paper,
we introduce FO-dtrees, which upgrade propositional dtrees to the first-order
level. We show how these trees can characterize a lifted inference solution for
a probabilistic logical model (in terms of a sequence of lifted operations),
and make a theoretical analysis of the complexity of lifted inference in terms
of the novel notion of lifted width for the tree
Multiplicative-Additive Proof Equivalence is Logspace-complete, via Binary Decision Trees
Given a logic presented in a sequent calculus, a natural question is that of
equivalence of proofs: to determine whether two given proofs are equated by any
denotational semantics, ie any categorical interpretation of the logic
compatible with its cut-elimination procedure. This notion can usually be
captured syntactically by a set of rule permutations.
Very generally, proofnets can be defined as combinatorial objects which
provide canonical representatives of equivalence classes of proofs. In
particular, the existence of proof nets for a logic provides a solution to the
equivalence problem of this logic. In certain fragments of linear logic, it is
possible to give a notion of proofnet with good computational properties,
making it a suitable representation of proofs for studying the cut-elimination
procedure, among other things.
It has recently been proved that there cannot be such a notion of proofnets
for the multiplicative (with units) fragment of linear logic, due to the
equivalence problem for this logic being Pspace-complete.
We investigate the multiplicative-additive (without unit) fragment of linear
logic and show it is closely related to binary decision trees: we build a
representation of proofs based on binary decision trees, reducing proof
equivalence to decision tree equivalence, and give a converse encoding of
binary decision trees as proofs. We get as our main result that the complexity
of the proof equivalence problem of the studied fragment is Logspace-complete.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1502.0199
On the extension complexity of combinatorial polytopes
In this paper we extend recent results of Fiorini et al. on the extension
complexity of the cut polytope and related polyhedra. We first describe a
lifting argument to show exponential extension complexity for a number of
NP-complete problems including subset-sum and three dimensional matching. We
then obtain a relationship between the extension complexity of the cut polytope
of a graph and that of its graph minors. Using this we are able to show
exponential extension complexity for the cut polytope of a large number of
graphs, including those used in quantum information and suspensions of cubic
planar graphs.Comment: 15 pages, 3 figures, 2 table
Tractability through Exchangeability: A New Perspective on Efficient Probabilistic Inference
Exchangeability is a central notion in statistics and probability theory. The
assumption that an infinite sequence of data points is exchangeable is at the
core of Bayesian statistics. However, finite exchangeability as a statistical
property that renders probabilistic inference tractable is less
well-understood. We develop a theory of finite exchangeability and its relation
to tractable probabilistic inference. The theory is complementary to that of
independence and conditional independence. We show that tractable inference in
probabilistic models with high treewidth and millions of variables can be
understood using the notion of finite (partial) exchangeability. We also show
that existing lifted inference algorithms implicitly utilize a combination of
conditional independence and partial exchangeability.Comment: In Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligenc
Decidability of the Monadic Shallow Linear First-Order Fragment with Straight Dismatching Constraints
The monadic shallow linear Horn fragment is well-known to be decidable and
has many application, e.g., in security protocol analysis, tree automata, or
abstraction refinement. It was a long standing open problem how to extend the
fragment to the non-Horn case, preserving decidability, that would, e.g.,
enable to express non-determinism in protocols. We prove decidability of the
non-Horn monadic shallow linear fragment via ordered resolution further
extended with dismatching constraints and discuss some applications of the new
decidable fragment.Comment: 29 pages, long version of CADE-26 pape
- …