Introduction to the ISO specification language LOTOS

LOTOS is a specification language that has been specifically developed for the formal description of the OSI (Open Systems Interconnection) architecture, although it is applicable to distributed, concurrent systems in general. In LOTOS a system is seen as a set of processes which interact and exchange data with each other and with their environment. LOTOS is expected to become an ISO international standard by 1988

TAPAs: A Tool for the Analysis of Process Algebras

Process algebras are formalisms for modelling concurrent systems that permit mathematical reasoning with respect to a set of desired properties. TAPAs is a tool that can be used to support the use of process algebras to specify and analyze concurrent systems. It does not aim at guaranteeing high performances, but has been developed as a support to teaching. Systems are described as process algebras terms that are then mapped to labelled transition systems (LTSs). Properties are verified either by checking equivalence of concrete and abstract systems descriptions, or by model checking temporal formulae over the obtained LTS. A key feature of TAPAs, that makes it particularly suitable for teaching, is that it maintains a consistent double representation of each system both as a term and as a graph. Another useful didactical feature is the exhibition of counterexamples in case equivalences are not verified or the proposed formulae are not satisfied

Verification of LOTOS Specifications Using Term Rewriting Techniques

Recently the use of formal methods in describing and analysing the behaviour of (computer) systems has become more common. This has resulted in the proliferation of a wide variety of different specification formalisms, together with analytical techniques and methodologies for specification development. The particular specification formalism adopted for this study is LOTOS, an ISO standard formal description technique. Although there are many works dealing with how to write LOTOS specifications and how to develop a LOTOS specification from the initial abstract requirements specification to concrete implementation, relatively few works are concerned with the problems of expressing and proving the correctness of LOTOS specifications, i.e. verification. The main objective of this thesis is to address this shortfall by investigating the meaning of verification as it relates to concurrent systems in general, and in particular to those systems described using LOTUS. Further goals are to automate the verification process using equational reasoning and term rewriting, and also to attempt to make the results of this work, both theoretical and practical, as accessible to LOTOS practitioners as possible. After introducing the LOTUS language and related formalisms, the thesis continues with a survey of approaches to verification of concurrent systems with a view to identifying those approaches suitable for use in verification of properties of systems specified using LOTOS. Both general methodology and specific implementation techniques are considered. As a result of this survey, two useful approaches are identified. Both are based on the technique of expressing the correctness of a LOTUS specification by comparison with another, typically more abstract, specification. The second approach, covered later in the thesis, uses logic for the more abstract specification. The main part of the thesis is concerned with the first approach, in which both specifications are described in LOTUS, and the comparison is expressed by a behavioural equivalence or preorder relation. This approach is further explored by means of proofs based on the paradigm of equational reasoning, implemented by term rewriting. Initially, only Basic LOTUS (i.e. the process algebra) is considered. A complete (i.e. confluent and terminating) rule set for weak bisimulation congruence over a subset of Basic LOTOS is developed using RRL (Rewrite Rule Laboratory). Although fully automatic, this proof technique is found to be insufficient for anything other than finite toy examples. In order to give more power, the rule set is supplemented by an incomplete set of rules expressing the expansion law. The incompleteness of the rule set necessitates the use of a strategy in applying the rules, as indiscriminate application of the rules may lead to non-termination of the rewriting. A case study illustrates the use of these rules, and also the effect of different interpretations of the verification requirement on the outcome of the proof. This proof technique, as a result of the deficiencies of the tool on which it is based, has two major failings: an inability to handle recursion, and no opportunity for user control in the proof. Moving to a different tool, PAM (Process Algebra Manipulator), allows correction of these faults, but at the cost of automation. The new implementation acts merely as computerised pencil and paper, although tactics can be defined which allow some degree of automation. Equations may be applied in either direction, therefore completion is no longer as important. (Note that the tactic language could be used to describe a a complete set of rules which would give an automatic proof technique, therefore some effort towards completion is still desirable. However, since LOTOS weak bisimulation congruence is undecidable, there can never be a complete rule set for deciding equivalence of terms from the full LOTUS language.) The composition of the rule set is re-considered, with a. view to using alternative axiomatisations of weak bisimulation congruence: two main axiomatisations are described and their relative merits compared. The axiomatisation of other LOTUS relations is also considered. In particular, we consider the pitfalls of axiomatising the cred preorder relation. In order to demonstrate the use of the PAM proof system developed, the case study, modified to use recursion, is re-examined. Four other examples taken from the literature, one substantial, the others fairly small, are also investigated to further demonstrate the applicability of the PAM proof system to a variety of examples. The above approach considers Basic LOTUS only; to be more generally applicable the verification of properties of full LOTOS specifications (i.e. including abstract data types) must also be studied. Methods for proving the equivalence of full LOTUS specifications are examined, including a modification of the technique used successfully above. The application of this technique is illustrated via proofs of the equivalence of three variants of the well-known stack example

Fair Testing

In this paper we present a solution to the long-standing problem of characterising the coarsest liveness-preserving pre-congruence with respect to a full (TCSP-inspired) process algebra. In fact, we present two distinct characterisations, which give rise to the same relation: an operational one based on a De Nicola-Hennessy-like testing modality which we call should-testing, and a denotational one based on a refined notion of failures. One of the distinguishing characteristics of the should-testing pre-congruence is that it abstracts from divergences in the same way as Milner¿s observation congruence, and as a consequence is strictly coarser than observation congruence. In other words, should-testing has a built-in fairness assumption. This is in itself a property long sought-after; it is in notable contrast to the well-known must-testing of De Nicola and Hennessy (denotationally characterised by a combination of failures and divergences), which treats divergence as catrastrophic and hence is incompatible with observation congruence. Due to these characteristics, should-testing supports modular reasoning and allows to use the proof techniques of observation congruence, but also supports additional laws and techniques. Moreover, we show decidability of should-testing (on the basis of the denotational characterisation). Finally, we demonstrate its advantages by the application to a number of examples, including a scheduling problem, a version of the Alternating Bit-protocol, and fair lossy communication channel

Process Algebras

Process Algebras are mathematically rigorous languages with well defined semantics that permit describing and verifying properties of concurrent communicating systems. They can be seen as models of processes, regarded as agents that act and interact continuously with other similar agents and with their common environment. The agents may be real-world objects (even people), or they may be artifacts, embodied perhaps in computer hardware or software systems. Many different approaches (operational, denotational, algebraic) are taken for describing the meaning of processes. However, the operational approach is the reference one. By relying on the so called Structural Operational Semantics (SOS), labelled transition systems are built and composed by using the different operators of the many different process algebras. Behavioral equivalences are used to abstract from unwanted details and identify those systems that react similarly to external experiments

Meta SOS - A Maude Based SOS Meta-Theory Framework

Meta SOS is a software framework designed to integrate the results from the meta-theory of structural operational semantics (SOS). These results include deriving semantic properties of language constructs just by syntactically analyzing their rule-based definition, as well as automatically deriving sound and ground-complete axiomatizations for languages, when considering a notion of behavioural equivalence. This paper describes the Meta SOS framework by blending aspects from the meta-theory of SOS, details on their implementation in Maude, and running examples.Comment: In Proceedings EXPRESS/SOS 2013, arXiv:1307.690

Testing real-time multi input-output systems

In formal testing, the assumption of input enabling is typically made. This assumption requires all inputs to be enabled anytime. In addition, the useful concept of quiescence is sometimes applied. Briefly, a system is in a quiescent state when it cannot produce outputs. In this paper, we relax the input enabling assumption, and allow some input sets to be enabled while others remain disabled. Moreover, we also relax the general bound M used in timed systems to detect quiescence, and allow different bounds for different sets of outputs. By considering the tioco-M theory, an enriched theory for timed testing with repetitive quiescence, and allowing the partition of input sets and output sets, we introduce the mtioco^M relation. A test derivation procedure which is nondeterministic and parameterized is further developed, and shown to be sound and complete wrt mtioco^

Testing multi input-output real-time systems (Extended version)

In formal testing, the assumption of input enabling is typically made. This assumption requires all inputs to be enabled anytime. In addition, the useful concept of quiescence is sometimes applied. Briefly, a system is in a quiescent state when it cannot produce outputs. In this paper, we relax the input enabling assumption, and allow some input sets to be enabled while others remain disabled. Moreover, we also relax the general bound M used in timed systems to detect quiescence, and allow different bounds for different sets of outputs. By considering the tiocoM theory, an enriched theory for timed testing with repetitive quiescence, and allowing the partition of input sets and output sets, we introduce the mtiocoM relation. A test derivation procedure which is nondeterministic and parameterized is further developed, and shown to be sound and complete wrt mtiocoM