Query-by-Example Spoken Term Detection ALBAYZIN 2012 evaluation: overview, systems, results and discussion

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1687-4722-2013-23Query-by-Example Spoken Term Detection (QbE STD) aims at retrieving data from a speech data repository given an acoustic query containing the term of interest as input. Nowadays, it has been receiving much interest due to the high volume of information stored in audio or audiovisual format. QbE STD differs from automatic speech recognition (ASR) and keyword spotting (KWS)/spoken term detection (STD) since ASR is interested in all the terms/words that appear in the speech signal and KWS/STD relies on a textual transcription of the search term to retrieve the speech data. This paper presents the systems submitted to the ALBAYZIN 2012 QbE STD evaluation held as a part of ALBAYZIN 2012 evaluation campaign within the context of the IberSPEECH 2012 Conferencea. The evaluation consists of retrieving the speech files that contain the input queries, indicating their start and end timestamps within the appropriate speech file. Evaluation is conducted on a Spanish spontaneous speech database containing a set of talks from MAVIR workshopsb, which amount at about 7 h of speech in total. We present the database metric systems submitted along with all results and some discussion. Four different research groups took part in the evaluation. Evaluation results show the difficulty of this task and the limited performance indicates there is still a lot of room for improvement. The best result is achieved by a dynamic time warping-based search over Gaussian posteriorgrams/posterior phoneme probabilities. This paper also compares the systems aiming at establishing the best technique dealing with that difficult task and looking for defining promising directions for this relatively novel task.Tejedor, J.; Toledano, DT.; Anguera, X.; Varona, A.; Hurtado Oliver, LF.; Miguel, A.; Colás, J. (2013). Query-by-Example Spoken Term Detection ALBAYZIN 2012 evaluation: overview, systems, results and discussion. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing. (23):1-17. doi:10.1186/1687-4722-2013-23S11723Zhang T, Kuo CCJ: Hierarchical classification of audio data for archiving and retrieving. In Proceedings of ICASSP. Phoenix; 15–19 March 1999:3001-3004.Helén M, Virtanen T: Query by example of audio signals using Euclidean distance between Gaussian Mixture Models. In Proceedings of ICASSP. Honolulu; 15–20 April 2007:225-228.Helén M, Virtanen T: Audio query by example using similarity measures between probability density functions of features. EURASIP J. Audio Speech Music Process 2010, 2010: 2:1-2:12.Tzanetakis G, Ermolinskyi A, Cook P: Pitch histograms in audio and symbolic music information retrieval. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Music Information Retrieval: ISMIR. Paris; 2002:31-38.Tsai HM, Wang WH: A query-by-example framework to retrieve music documents by singer. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. Taipei; 27–30 June 2004:1863-1866.Chia TK, Sim KC, Li H, Ng HT: A lattice-based approach to query-by-example spoken document retrieval. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Singapore; 20–24 July 2008:363-370.Tejedor J, Fapšo M, Szöke I, Černocký H, Grézl F: Comparison of methods for language-dependent and language-independent query-by-example spoken term detection. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst 2012, 30(3):18:1-18:34.Muscariello A, Gravier G, Bimbot F: Zero-resource audio-only spoken term detection based on a combination of template matching techniques. In Proceedings of Interspeech. Florence; 27–31 August 2011:921-924.Lin H, Stupakov A, Bilmes J: Spoken keyword spotting via multi-lattice alignment. In 9th International Speech Communication Association Annual Conference. Brisbane, Australia; September 2008:2191-2194.Parada C, Sethy A, Ramabhadran B: Query-by-Example Spoken Term Detection for OOV terms. In Proceedings of ASRU. Merano; 13-17 December 2009:404-409.Shen W, White TJ, Hazen CM: A comparison of Query-by-Example methods for Spoken Term Detection. In Proceedings of Interspeech. Brighton; September 2009:2143-2146.Lin H, Stupakov A, Bilmes J: Improving multi-lattice alignment based spoken keyword spotting. In Proceedings of ICASSP. Taipei; 19–24 April 2009:4877-4880.Barnard E, Davel M, van Heerden C, Kleynhans N, Bali K: Phone recognition for spoken web search. In Proceedings of MediaEval. Pisa; 1–2 September 2011:5-6.Buzo A, Cucu H, Safta M, Ionescu B, Burileanu C: ARF@MediaEval 2012: a Romanian ASR-based approach to spoken term detection. In Proceedings of MediaEval. Pisa; 4–5 October 2012:7-8.Abad A, Astudillo RF: The L2F spoken web search system for MediaEval 2012. In Proceedings of MediaEval. Pisa; 4–5 October 2012:9-10.Varona A, Penagarikano M, Rodríguez-Fuentes L, Bordel L, Diez M: GTTS system for the spoken web search task at MediaEval 2012. In Proceedings of MediaEval. Pisa; 4–5 October 2012:13-14.Szöke I, Faps̆o M, Veselý K: BUT2012 Approaches for spoken web search - MediaEval 2012. In Proceedings of MediaEval. Pisa;4–5October 2012:15-16.Hazen W, Shen TJ, White CM: Query-by-Example spoken term detection using phonetic posteriorgram templates. In Proceedings of ASRU. Merano; 13–17 December 2009:421-426.Zhang Y, Glass JR: Unsupervised spoken keyword spotting via segmental DTW on Gaussian Posteriorgrams. In Proceedings of ASRU. Merano; 13–17 December 2009:398-403.Chan C, Lee L: Unsupervised spoken-term detection with spoken queries using segment-based dynamic time warping. In Proceedings of Interspeech. Makuhari; 26–30 September 2010:693-696.Anguera X, Macrae R, Oliver N: Partial sequence matching using an unbounded dynamic time warping algorithm. In Proceedings of ICASSP. Dallas; 14–19 March 2010:3582-3585.Anguera X: Telefonica system for the spoken web search Task at Mediaeval 2011. In Proceedings of MediaEval. Pisa; 1–2 September 2011:3-4.Muscariello A, Gravier G: Irisa MediaEval 2011 spoken web search system. In Proceedings of MediaEval. Pisa; 1–2 September 2011:9-10.Szöke I, Tejedor J, Faps̆o M, Colás J: BUT-HCTLab approaches for spoken web search - MediaEval 2011. In Proceedings of MediaEval. Pisa; 1–2 September 2011:11-12.Wang H, Lee T: CUHK System for the spoken web search task at Mediaeval 2012. In Proceedings of MediaEval. Pisa; 4–5 October 2012:3-4.Joder C, Weninger F, Wöllmer M, Schuller M: The TUM cumulative DTW approach for the Mediaeval 2012 spoken web search task. In Proceedings of MediaEval. Pisa; 4–5 October 2012:5-6.Vavrek J, Pleva M, Juhár J: TUKE MediaEval 2012: spoken web search using DTW and unsupervised SVM. In Proceedings of MediaEval. Pisa; 4–5 October 2012:11-12.Jansen A, Durme P, Clark BV: The JHU-HLTCOE spoken web search system for MediaEval 2012. In Proceedings of MediaEval. Pisa; 4–5 October 2012:17-18.Anguera X: Telefonica Research System for the spoken web search task at Mediaeval 2012. In Proceedings of MediaEval. Pisa; 4–5 October 2012:19-20.NIST: The Ninth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 9). 2000. http://trec.nist.gov . Accessed 16 September 2013NIST: The Spoken Term Detection (STD) 2006 Evaluation Plan. 10 (National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, 2006). . Accessed 16 September 2013 http://www.nist.gov/speech/tests/stdSakai T, Joho H: Overview of NTCIR-9. Proceedings of NTCIR-9 Workshop 2011, 1-7.Rajput N, Metze F: Spoken web search. In Proceedings of MediaEval. Pisa; 1–2 September 2011:1-2.Metze F, Barnard E, Davel M, van Heerden C, Anguera X, Gravier G, Rajput N: Spoken web search. In Proceedings of MediaEval. Pisa; 4–5 October 2012:1-2.Tokyo University of Technology: Evaluation of information access technologies: information retrieval, question answering and cross-lingual information access. 2013. http://research.nii.ac.jp/ntcir/ntcir-10/ . Accessed 16 September 2013NIST: The OpenKWS13 evaluation plan. 1, (National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, 2013). . Accessed 16 September 2013 http://www.nist.gov/itl/iad/mig/openkws13.cfmTaras B, Nadeu C: Audio segmentation of broadcast news in the Albayzin-2010 evaluation: overview, results, and discussion. EURASIP J. Audio Speech Music Process 2011, 1: 1-10.Zelenák M, Schulz H, Hernando J: Speaker diarization of broadcast news in Albayzin 2010 evaluation campaign. EURASIP J. Audio Speech Music Process 2012, 19: 1-9.Rodríguez-Fuentes LJ, Penagarikano M, Varona A, Díez M, Bordel G: The Albayzin 2010 language recognition evaluation. In Proceedings of Interspeech. Florence; 27–31 August 2011:1529-1532.Méndez F, Docío L, Arza M, Campillo F: The Albayzin 2010 text-to-speech evaluation. In Proceedings of FALA. Vigo; November 2010:317-340.Fiscus JG, Ajot J, Garofolo JS, Doddington G: Results of the 2006 spoken term detection evaluation. In Proceedings of SIGIR Workshop Searching Spontaneous Conversational Speech. Rhodes; 22–25 September 2007:45-50.Martin A, Doddington G, Kamm T, Ordowski M, Przybocki M: The DET curve in assessment of detection task performance. In Proceedings of Eurospeech. Rhodes; 22-25 September 1997:1895-1898.NIST: NIST Speech Tools and APIs: 2006 (National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, 1996). . Accessed 16 September 2013 http://www.nist.gov/speech/tools/index.htmIberspeech 2012: VII Jornadas en Tecnología del Habla and III Iberian SLTech Workshop. . Accessed 16 September 2013 http://iberspeech2012.ii.uam.es/IberSPEECH2012_OnlineProceedings.pdfAnguera X: Speaker independent discriminant feature extraction for acoustic pattern-matching. In Proceedings of ICASSP. Kyoto; 25–30 March 2012:485-488.Anguera X, Ferrarons M: Memory efficient subsequence DTW for Query-by-Example spoken term detection. Proceedings of ICME 2013. http://www.xavieranguera.com/papers/sdtw_icme2013.pdfAnguera X: Telefonica Research System for the Query-by-example task at Albayzin 2012. In Proceedings of IberSPEECH. Madrid, Spain; 21–23 November 2012:626-632.Schwarz P: Phoneme recognition based on long temporal context. PhD Thesis, FIT, BUT, Brno, Czech Republic. 2008.Stolckem A: SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit. In Proceedings of Interspeech. Denver; 2002:901-904.Wang D, King S, Frankel J: Stochastic pronunciation modelling for out-of-vocabulary spoken term detection. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Language Process 2011, 19(4):688-698.Wang D, Tejedor J, King S, Frankel J: Term-dependent confidence normalization for out-of-vocabulary spoken term detection. J. Comput. Sci. Technol 2012, 27(2):358-375. 10.1007/s11390-012-1228-xWang D, King S, Frankel J, Vipperla R, Evans N, Troncy R: Direct posterior confidence for out-of-vocabulary spoken term detection. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst 2012, 30(3):1-34.Varona A, Penagarikano M, Rodríguez-Fuentes LJ, Bordel G, Diez M: GTTS systems for the query-by-example spoken term detection task of the Albayzin 2012 search on speech evaluation. In Proceedings of IberSPEECH. Madrid, Spain; 21–23 November 2012:619-625.Gómez J, Sanchis E, Castro-Bleda M: Automatic speech segmentation based on acoustical clustering. Proceedings of the Joint IAPR International Conference on Structural, Syntactic, and Statistical Pattern Recognition 2010, 540-548.Gómez J, Castro M: Automatic segmentation of speech at the phonetic level. Proceedings of the joint IAPR International Workshop on Structural, Syntactic, and Statistical Pattern Recognition 2002, 672-680.Sanchis E, Hurtado LF, Gómez JA, Calvo M, Fabra R: The ELiRF Query-by-example STD systems for the Albayzin 2012 search on speech evaluation. In Proceedings of IberSPEECH. Madrid, Spain; 21–23 November 2012:611-618.Park A, Glass J: Towards unsupervised pattern discovery in speech. In Proceedings of ASRU. Cancun; 27 November to 1 December 2005:53-58.Young S, Evermann G, Gales M, Hain T, Kershaw D, Liu X, Moore G, Odell J, Ollason D, Povey D, Valtchev V, Woodland P: The HTK Book. Engineering Department, Cambridge University; 2006.Miguel A, Villalba J, Ortega A, Lleida E: Albayzin 2012 search on speech @ ViVoLab UZ. In Proceedings of IberSPEECH. Madrid, Spain; 21–23 November 2012:633-642.Boersma P, Weenink D: Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat, 210, Amsterdam, Holland. 2007. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/ . Accessed 16 September 2013Goldwater S, Jurafsky D, Maning CD: Which words are hard to recognize? Prosodic, lexical, and disfluency factors that increase speech recognition error rates. Speech Commun 2009, 52(3):181-200.Mertens T, Wallace R, Schneider D: Cross-site combination and evaluation of subword spoken term detection systems. In Proceedings of CBMI. Madrid; 13–15 June 2011:61-66

Spoken content retrieval: A survey of techniques and technologies

Speech media, that is, digital audio and video containing spoken content, has blossomed in recent years. Large collections are accruing on the Internet as well as in private and enterprise settings. This growth has motivated extensive research on techniques and technologies that facilitate reliable indexing and retrieval. Spoken content retrieval (SCR) requires the combination of audio and speech processing technologies with methods from information retrieval (IR). SCR research initially investigated planned speech structured in document-like units, but has subsequently shifted focus to more informal spoken content produced spontaneously, outside of the studio and in conversational settings. This survey provides an overview of the field of SCR encompassing component technologies, the relationship of SCR to text IR and automatic speech recognition and user interaction issues. It is aimed at researchers with backgrounds in speech technology or IR who are seeking deeper insight on how these fields are integrated to support research and development, thus addressing the core challenges of SCR

Fast and Accurate OOV Decoder on High-Level Features

This work proposes a novel approach to out-of-vocabulary (OOV) keyword search (KWS) task. The proposed approach is based on using high-level features from an automatic speech recognition (ASR) system, so called phoneme posterior based (PPB) features, for decoding. These features are obtained by calculating time-dependent phoneme posterior probabilities from word lattices, followed by their smoothing. For the PPB features we developed a special novel very fast, simple and efficient OOV decoder. Experimental results are presented on the Georgian language from the IARPA Babel Program, which was the test language in the OpenKWS 2016 evaluation campaign. The results show that in terms of maximum term weighted value (MTWV) metric and computational speed, for single ASR systems, the proposed approach significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art approach based on using in-vocabulary proxies for OOV keywords in the indexed database. The comparison of the two OOV KWS approaches on the fusion results of the nine different ASR systems demonstrates that the proposed OOV decoder outperforms the proxy-based approach in terms of MTWV metric given the comparable processing speed. Other important advantages of the OOV decoder include extremely low memory consumption and simplicity of its implementation and parameter optimization.Comment: Interspeech 2017, August 2017, Stockholm, Sweden. 201

Automatic tagging and geotagging in video collections and communities

Automatically generated tags and geotags hold great promise to improve access to video collections and online communi- ties. We overview three tasks offered in the MediaEval 2010 benchmarking initiative, for each, describing its use scenario, definition and the data set released. For each task, a reference algorithm is presented that was used within MediaEval 2010 and comments are included on lessons learned. The Tagging Task, Professional involves automatically matching episodes in a collection of Dutch television with subject labels drawn from the keyword thesaurus used by the archive staff. The Tagging Task, Wild Wild Web involves automatically predicting the tags that are assigned by users to their online videos. Finally, the Placing Task requires automatically assigning geo-coordinates to videos. The specification of each task admits the use of the full range of available information including user-generated metadata, speech recognition transcripts, audio, and visual features