415 research outputs found

    Model predictive torque vectoring control with active trail-braking for electric vehicles

    Get PDF
    In this work we present the development of a torque vectoring controller for electric vehicles. The proposed controller distributes drive/brake torque between the four wheels to achieve the desired handling response and, in addition, intervenes in the longitudinal dynamics in cases where the turning radius demand is infeasible at the speed at which the vehicle is traveling. The proposed controller is designed in both the Linear and Nonlinear Model Predictive Control framework, which have shown great promise for real time implementation the last decades. Hence, we compare both controllers and observe their ability to behave under critical nonlinearities of the vehicle dynamics in limit handling conditions and constraints from the actuators and tyre-road interaction. We implement the controllers in a realistic, high fidelity simulation environment to demonstrate their performance using CarMaker and Simulink

    Modelling and Control of Narrow Tilting Vehicle for Future Transportation System

    Get PDF
    The increasing number of cars leads traffic congestion and parking problems in urban area. Small electric four-wheeled narrow tilting vehicles (NTV) have the potential to become the next generation of city cars. However, due to its narrow width, the NTV has to lean into corners like two-wheeled vehicles during a turn. It is a challenge to maintain its roll stability to protect it from falling down. This chapter aims to describe the development of NTV and drive assistance technologies in helping to improve the stability of an NTV in turning. The modelling of an NTV considers the dynamics of the tyres and power train of the vehicle. A nonlinear tilting controller for the direct tilting control mechanism is designed to reduce the nonlinear behaviour of an NTV operating at different vehicle velocities. In addition, two torque vectoring based torque controllers are designed to reduce the counter-steering process and improve the stability of the NTV when it turns into a corner. The results indicate that the designed controllers have the ability to reduce the yaw rate tracking error and maximum roll rate. Then riders can drive an NTV easily with the drive assistance system

    2022 Vehicle Dynamics seminar

    Get PDF
    The seminar is held annually. The full title of this year\u27s seminar was "2021 Vehicle Dynamics seminar -- Connected and Electric"

    Integration of Active Systems for a Global Chassis Control Design

    Get PDF
    Vehicle chassis control active systems (braking, suspension, steering and driveline), from the first ABS/ESC control unit to the current advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), are progressively revolutionizing the way of thinking and designing the vehicle, improving its interaction with the surrounding world (V2V and V2X) and have led to excellent results in terms of safety and performances (dynamic behavior and drivability). They are usually referred as intelligent vehicles due to a software/hardware architecture able to assist the driver for achieving specific safety margin and/or optimal vehicle dynamic behavior. Moreover, industrial and academic communities agree that these technologies will progress till the diffusion of the so called autonomous cars which are able to drive robustly in a wide range of traffic scenarios. Different autonomous vehicles are already available in Europe, Japan and United States and several solutions have been proposed for smart cities and/or small public area like university campus. In this context, the present research activity aims at improving safety, comfort and performances through the integration of global active chassis control: the purposes are to study, design and implement control strategies to support the driver for achieving one or more final target among safety, comfort and performance. Specifically, the vehicle subsystems that are involved in the present research for active systems development are the steering system, the propulsion system, the transmission and the braking system. The thesis is divided into three sections related to different applications of active systems that, starting from a robust theoretical design procedure, are strongly supported by objective experimental results obtained fromHardware In the Loop (HIL) test rigs and/or proving ground testing sessions. The first chapter is dedicated to one of the most discussed topic about autonomous driving due to its impact from the social point of view and in terms of human error mitigation when the driver is not prompt enough. In particular, it is here analyzed the automated steering control which is already implemented for automatic parking and that could represent also a key element for conventional passenger car in emergency situation where a braking intervention is not enough for avoiding an imminent collision. The activity is focused on different steering controllers design and their implementation for an autonomous vehicle; an obstacle collision avoidance adaptation is introduced for future implementations. Three different controllers, Proportional Derivative (PD), PD+Feedforward (FF) e PD+Integral Sliding Mode (ISM), are designed for tracking a reference trajectory that can be modified in real-time for obstacle avoidance purposes. Furthermore, PD+FF and PD+ISM logic are able to improve the tracking performances of automated steering during cornering maneuvers, relevant fromthe collision avoidance point of view. Path tracking control and its obstacle avoidance enhancement is also shown during experimental tests executed in a proving ground through its implementation for an autonomous vehicle demonstrator. Even if the activity is presented for an autonomous vehicle, the active control can be developed also for a conventional vehicle equipped with an Electronic Power Steering (EPS) or Steer-by-wire architectures. The second chapter describes a Torque Vectoring (TV) control strategy, applied to a Fully Electric Vehicle (FEV) with four independent electric motor (one for each wheel), that aims to optimize the lateral vehicle behavior by a proper electric motor torque regulation. A yaw rate controller is presented and designed in order to achieve a desired steady-state lateral behaviour of the car (handling task). Furthermore, a sideslip angle controller is also integrated to preserve vehicle stability during emergency situations (safety task). LQR, LQR+FF and ISM strategies are formulated and explained for yaw rate and concurrent yaw rate/sideslip angle control techniques also comparing their advantages and weakness points. The TV strategy is implemented and calibrated on a FEV demonstrator by executing experimental maneuvers (step steer, skid pad, lane change and sequence of step steers) thus proving the efficacy of the proposed controller and the safety contribution guaranteed by the sideslip control. The TV could be also applied for internal combustion engine driven vehicles by installing specific torque vectoring differentials, able to distribute the torque generated by the engine to each wheel independently. The TV strategy evaluated in the second chapter can be influenced by the presence of a transmission between themotor (or the engine) and wheels (where the torque control is supposed to be designed): in addition to the mechanical delay introduced by transmission components, the presence of gears backlashes can provoke undesired noises and vibrations in presence of torque sign inversion. The last chapter is thus related to a new method for noises and vibration attenuation for a Dual Clutch Transmission (DCT). This is achieved in a new way by integrating the powertrain control with the braking system control, which are historically and conventionally analyzed and designed separately. It is showed that a torsional preload effect can be obtained on transmission components by increasing the wheel torque and concurrently applying a braking wheel torque. For this reason, a pressure following controller is presented and validated through a Hardware In the Loop (HIL) test rig in order to track a reference value of braking torque thus ensuring the desired preload effect and noises reduction. Experimental results demonstrates the efficacy of the controller, also opening new scenario for global chassis control design. Finally, some general conclusions are drawn and possible future activities and recommendations are proposed for further investigations or improvements with respect to the results shown in the present work

    ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ธํœ ๋ชจํ„ฐ ํ† ํฌ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2021.8. ์ด๊ฒฝ์ˆ˜.์ง€๋‚œ 10๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด์‹œ์Šคํ…œ(ESC)์€ ์น˜๋ช…์ ์ธ ์ถฉ๋Œ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ์ƒ์šฉ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์—์„œ ๋น„์•ฝ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐœ์ „๋˜๊ณ  ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์•…์ฒœํ›„๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ฏธ๋„๋Ÿฌ์šด ๋„๋กœ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์œ„ํ—˜ํ•œ ๋„๋กœ์—์„œ ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ •ํ•œ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์ฃผํ–‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์‚ฌ๊ณ ๋ฅผ ํ”ผํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํฐ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์ตœ๊ทผ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ๋˜๋Š” ์Šคํฌ์ธ ์นด ๋“ฑ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ œ๋™์ œ์–ด์˜ ๋นˆ๋ฒˆํ•œ ๊ฐœ์ž…์€ ์šด์ „์˜ ์ฆ๊ฑฐ์›€์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ถˆ๋งŒ๋„ ์กด์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ „๋™ํ™”์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜, ์ž๋Ÿ‰ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์ž‘๋™ ์˜์—ญ์ธ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ฃผํ–‰ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ฐ ํœ ์˜ ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์ธ ๊ตฌ๋™์„ ์ ์šฉ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ ์ธํœ  ๋ชจํ„ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ข…, ํšก๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ œ์–ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋Š” ํ† ํฌ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์„ ํšŒ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ฃผํ–‰ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏน ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ† ํฌ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ์ฃผํ–‰ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์ธ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž๋™ ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ์ œ์–ด ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ† ํฌ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง์ œ์–ด์— ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏนํ•œ ์ฃผํ–‰๋ชจ๋“œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฏธ๋„๋Ÿฌ์šด ๋„๋กœ์—์„œ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋†’์€ ์Šฌ๋ฆฝ ๊ฐ๋„์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณต ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ธํœ  ๋ชจํ„ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ „๋ฅœ์— 2๊ฐœ ๋ชจํ„ฐ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ณ ์œ ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์ธ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์–ธ๋”์Šคํ‹ฐ์–ด ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ์ง์ ‘์  ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์˜ ์ฑ„ํ„ฐ๋ง ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๊ณ  ๋น ๋ฅธ ์‘๋‹ต์„ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ณผ๋„ ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์‹ํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ๋ฐ ๊ณผ๋„ ํŠน์„ฑ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ISO ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์š” ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์™€ ํšก ์Šฌ๋ฆฝ ๊ฐ๋„ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ MASMC (Multiple Adaptive Sliding Mode Control) ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” 4๋ฅœ ๋ชจํ„ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๋™์  ํ† ํฌ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋†’์€ ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ „ํ›„๋ฅœ ํƒ€์ด์–ด์˜ ์ฝ”๋„ˆ๋ง ๊ฐ•์„ฑ์€ ์ ์‘์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์•ˆ์ „๋ชจ๋“œ์™€ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏน ๋ชจ๋“œ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ, ์šด์ „์ž๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ๊ธˆ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผํ–‰์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ์„ ํƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด MASMC ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ „๋™ํ™” ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์— ์ฃผํ–‰์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๊ณผ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏนํ•œ ์ฃผํ–‰์˜ ์ฆ๊ฑฐ์›€์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋กœ์จ, ์ „์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.In the last ten decades, vehicle stability control systems have been dramatically developed and adapted in many commercial vehicles to avoid fatal crashes. Significantly, ESC (Electric Stability Control) system can help escape the accident from unstable driving conditions with dangerous roads such as slippery roads due to inclement weather conditions. However, for the high performed vehicle, frequent intervention from ESC reduces the pleasure of fun-to-drive. Recently, the development of traction control technologies has been taking place with that of the electrification of vehicles. The IWMs (In-Wheel Motor system), which is one of the systems that can apply independent drive of each wheel, for the limit handling characteristics, which are the operation areas of the ESC, is introduced for the control that enables the lateral characteristics of the vehicle dynamics. Firstly, the automated drift control algorithm can be proposed for the nonlinear limit handling condition of vehicles. This approach can give an insight of fun-to-drive mode to TV (Torque Vector) control scheme, but also the stability control of high sideslip angle of the vehicle on slippery roads. Secondly, using IWMs system with front two motors, understeer gradient of vehicle, which is the unique characteristics of vehicle can be used for the proposed control strategy. A new transient parameter is formulated to be acquired rapid response of controller and reducing chattering effects. Simulation and vehicle tests are conducted for validation of TV control algorithm with steady-state and transient ISO-based tests. Finally, dynamic torque vectoring control with a four-wheel motor system with Multiple Adaptive Sliding Mode Control (MASMC) approach, which is composed of a yaw rate controller and sideslip angle controller, is introduced. Highly nonlinear characteristics, cornering stiffnesses of front and rear tires are estimated by adaptation law with measuring data. Consequently, there are two types of driving modes, the safety mode and the dynamic mode. MASMC algorithm can be found and validated by simulation in torque vectoring technology to improve the handling performance of fully electric vehicles.Chapter 1 Introduction 7 1.1. Background and Motivation 7 1.2. Literature review 11 1.3. Thesis Objectives 15 1.4. Thesis Outline 15 Chapter 2 Vehicle dynamic control at limit handling 17 2.1. Vehicle Model and Analysis 17 2.1.1. Lateral dynamics of vehicle 17 2.1.2. Longitudinal dynamics of vehicle 20 2.2. Tire Model 24 2.3. Analysis of vehicle drift for fun-to-drive 28 2.4. Designing A Controller for Automated Drift 34 2.4.1. Lateral controller 35 2.4.2. Longitudinal Controller 37 2.4.3. Stability Analysis 39 2.4.4. Validation with simulation and test 40 Chapter 3 Torque Vectoring Control with Front Two Motor In-Wheel Vehicles 47 3.1. Dynamic Torque Vectoring Control 48 3.1.1. In-wheel motor system (IWMs) 48 3.1.2. Dynamic system modeling 49 3.1.3. Designing controller 53 3.2. Validation with Simulation and Experiment 59 3.2.1. Simulation 59 3.2.2. Vehicle Experiment 64 Chapter 4 Dynamic handling control for Four-wheel Drive In-Wheel platform 75 4.1. Vehicle System Modeling 76 4.2. Motion Control based on MASMC 78 4.2.1. Yaw motion controller for the inner ASMC 80 4.2.2. Sideslip angle controller for the outer ASMC 84 4.3. Optimal Torque Distribution (OTD) 88 4.3.1. Constraints of dynamics 88 4.3.2. Optimal torque distribution law 90 4.4. Validation with Simulation 91 4.4.1. Simulation setup 91 4.4.2. Simulation results 92 Chapter 5 Conclusion and Future works 104 5.1 Conclusion 104 5.2 Future works 106 Bibliography 108 Abstract in Korean 114๋ฐ•

    Experimental modelling and optimal torque vectoring control for 4WD vehicles

    Get PDF
    ยฉ 2022 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting /republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other worksThis paper addresses the design of a torque vectoring architecture to control the four electrical machines in a four wheel-drive (4WD) formula-type competition vehicle. The scheme includes a new yaw-rate controller and a novel optimal torque distribution algorithm. Two yaw-rate controllers are proposed: one based on H8 optimal control and another based on linear parameter varying (LPV) system concepts. Both controllers are designed using an extended bicycle model validated with experimental data. Simulation results shown the effectiveness of the proposed overall control scheme in terms of energy efficiency, cornering speed and stability no matter the high-demanding working conditions. Such an effectiveness is quantitatively demonstrated by means of several key performance indicators chosen to ease the comparison of the proposed approach with respect to other reported works.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

    On pre-emptive vehicle stability control

    Get PDF
    Future vehicle localisation technologies enable major enhancements of vehicle dynamics control. This study proposes a novel vehicle stability control paradigm, based on pre-emptive control that considers the curvature profile of the expected path ahead in the computation of the reference direct yaw moment and braking control action. The additional information allows pre-emptive trail braking control, which slows down the vehicle if the predicted speed profile based on the current torque demand is deemed incompatible with the reference trajectory ahead. Nonlinear model predictive control is used to implement the approach, in which also the steering angle and reference yaw rate provided to the internal model are varied along the prediction horizon, to account for the expected vehicle path. Two pre-emptive stability control configurations with different levels of complexity are proposed and compared with the passive vehicle, and two state-of-the-art nonlinear model predictive stability controllers, one with and one without non-pre-emptive trail braking control. The performance is assessed along obstacle avoidance tests, simulated with a high-fidelity model of an electric vehicle with in-wheel motors. Results show that the pre-emptive controllers achieve higher maximum entry speeds โ€“ up to โˆผ34% and โˆผ60% in high and low tyre-road friction conditions โ€“ than the formulations without preview.This work was supported in part by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Commission under grant agreements no. 769944 (STEVE project) and no. 824311 (ACHILES project)

    Optimal torque vectoring control strategies for stabilisation of electric vehicles at the limits of handling

    Get PDF
    The study of chassis control has been a major research area in the automotive industry and academia for more than fifty years now. Among the popular methods used to actively control the dynamics of a vehicle, torque vectoring, the method of controlling both the direction and the magnitude of the torque on the wheels, is of particular interest. Such a method can alter the vehicleโ€™s behaviour in a positive way under both sub-limit and limit handling conditions and has become even more relevant in the case of an electric vehicle equipped with multiple electric motors. Torque vectoring has been so far employed mainly in lateral vehicle dynamics control applications, with the longitudinal dynamics of the vehicle remaining under the full authority of the driver. Nevertheless, it has been also recognised that active control of the longitudinal dynamics of the vehicle can improve vehicle stability in limit handling situations. A characteristic example of this is the case where the driver misjudges the entry speed into a corner and the vehicle starts to deviate from its path, a situation commonly referred to as a โ€˜terminal understeerโ€™ condition. Use of combined longitudinal and lateral control in such scenarios have been already proposed in the literature, but these solutions are mainly based on heuristic approaches that also neglect the strong coupling of longitudinal and lateral dynamics in limit handling situations. The main aim of this project is to develop a real-time implementable multivariable control strategy to stabilise the vehicle at the limits of handling in an optimal way using torque vectoring via the two independently controlled electric motors on the rear axle of an electric vehicle. To this end, after reviewing the most important contributions in the control of lateral and/or longitudinal vehicle dynamics with a particular focus on the limit handling solutions, a realistic vehicle reference behaviour near the limit of lateral acceleration is derived. An unconstrained optimal control strategy is then developed for terminal understeer mitigation. The importance of constraining both the vehicle state and the control inputs when the vehicle operates at the limits of handling is shown by developing a constrained linear optimal control framework, while the effect of using a constrained nonlinear optimal control framework instead is subsequently examined next. Finally an optimal estimation strategy for providing the necessary vehicle state information to the proposed optimal control strategies is constructed, assuming that only common vehicle sensors are available. All the developed optimal control strategies are assessed not only in terms of performance but also execution time, so to make sure they are implementable in real time on a typical Electronic Control Unit

    Multi-Actuated Vehicle Control and Path Planning/Tracking at Handling Limits

    Get PDF
    The increasing requirements for vehicle safety along with the impressive progress in vehicle actuation technologies have motivated manufacturers to equip vehicles with multiple control actuations that enhance handling and stability. Moreover, multiple control objectives arise in vehicle dynamics control problems, such as yaw rate control and rollover prevention, therefore, vehicle control problems can be defined as multi-actuation multi-objective vehicle control problems. Recently, the importance of integrating vehicle control systems has been highlighted in the literature. This integration allows us to prevent the potential conflicting control commands that could be generated by individual controllers. Existing studies on multi-actuated vehicle control offer a coordinated control design that shares the required control effort between the actuations. However, they mostly lack an appropriate strategy for considering the differences among vehicle actuations in their energy usage, capabilities, and effectiveness in any given vehicle states. Therefore, it is very important to develop a cost-performance strategy for optimally controlling multi-actuated vehicles. In this thesis, a prioritization model predictive control design is proposed for multi-actuated vehicles with multiple control objectives. The designed controller prioritizes the control actuations and control objectives based on, respectively, their advantages and their importance, and then combines the priorities such that a low priority actuation will not kick in unless a high priority objective demands it. The proposed controller is employed for several actuations, including electronic limited slip differential (ELSD), front/rear torque shifting, and differential braking. In this design, differential braking is engaged only when it is necessary, thus limiting or avoiding its disadvantages such as speed reduction and maintenance. In addition, the proposed control design includes a detailed analysis of the above-mentioned actuations in terms of modelling, control, and constraints. A new vehicle prediction model is designed for integrated lateral and roll dynamics that considers the force coupling effect and allows for the optimal control of front/rear torque distribution. The existing methods for ELSD control may result in chattering or unwanted oversteering yaw moments. To resolve this problem, a dynamic model is first designed for the ELSD clutch to properly estimate the clutch torque. This ELSD model is then used to design an intelligent ELSD controller that resolves the issues mentioned above. Experimental tests with two different vehicles are also carried out to evaluate the performance of the prioritization MPC controller in real-time. The results verify the capability of the controller in properly activating the control actuations with the designed priorities to improve vehicle handling and stability in different driving maneuvers. In addition, the test results confirm the performance of the designed ELSD model in ELSD clutch torque estimation and in enabling the controller to prevent unwanted oversteering yaw moments. The designed stability controller is extended to use for emergency collision avoidance in autonomous vehicles. This extension in fact addresses a local path planning/tracking problem with control objectives prioritized as: 1) collision avoidance, 2) vehicle stability, and 3) tracking the desired path. The controller combines a conservative form of torque/brake vectoring with front steering to improve the lateral agility and responsiveness of the vehicle in emergency collision avoidance scenarios. In addition, a contingency MPC controller is designed with two parallel prediction horizons - a nominal horizon and a contingency horizon - to maintain avoidance in identified road condition uncertainties. The performance of the model predictive controllers is evaluated in software simulations with high fidelity CarSim models, in which different sets of actuation configurations in various driving and road conditions are assessed. In addition, the effectiveness of the local path planning/tracking controller is evaluated in several emergency and contingency collision avoidance scenarios
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore