Cancer diagnosis using deep learning: A bibliographic review

In this paper, we first describe the basics of the field of cancer diagnosis, which includes steps of cancer diagnosis followed by the typical classification methods used by doctors, providing a historical idea of cancer classification techniques to the readers. These methods include Asymmetry, Border, Color and Diameter (ABCD) method, seven-point detection method, Menzies method, and pattern analysis. They are used regularly by doctors for cancer diagnosis, although they are not considered very efficient for obtaining better performance. Moreover, considering all types of audience, the basic evaluation criteria are also discussed. The criteria include the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), Area under the ROC curve (AUC), F1 score, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, precision, dice-coefficient, average accuracy, and Jaccard index. Previously used methods are considered inefficient, asking for better and smarter methods for cancer diagnosis. Artificial intelligence and cancer diagnosis are gaining attention as a way to define better diagnostic tools. In particular, deep neural networks can be successfully used for intelligent image analysis. The basic framework of how this machine learning works on medical imaging is provided in this study, i.e., pre-processing, image segmentation and post-processing. The second part of this manuscript describes the different deep learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), generative adversarial models (GANs), deep autoencoders (DANs), restricted Boltzmann’s machine (RBM), stacked autoencoders (SAE), convolutional autoencoders (CAE), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), long short-term memory (LTSM), multi-scale convolutional neural network (M-CNN), multi-instance learning convolutional neural network (MIL-CNN). For each technique, we provide Python codes, to allow interested readers to experiment with the cited algorithms on their own diagnostic problems. The third part of this manuscript compiles the successfully applied deep learning models for different types of cancers. Considering the length of the manuscript, we restrict ourselves to the discussion of breast cancer, lung cancer, brain cancer, and skin cancer. The purpose of this bibliographic review is to provide researchers opting to work in implementing deep learning and artificial neural networks for cancer diagnosis a knowledge from scratch of the state-of-the-art achievements

A transfer-learning approach to feature extraction from cancer transcriptomes with deep autoencoders

Publicado en Lecture Notes in Computer Science.The diagnosis and prognosis of cancer are among the more challenging tasks that oncology medicine deals with. With the main aim of fitting the more appropriate treatments, current personalized medicine focuses on using data from heterogeneous sources to estimate the evolu- tion of a given disease for the particular case of a certain patient. In recent years, next-generation sequencing data have boosted cancer prediction by supplying gene-expression information that has allowed diverse machine learning algorithms to supply valuable solutions to the problem of cancer subtype classification, which has surely contributed to better estimation of patient’s response to diverse treatments. However, the efficacy of these models is seriously affected by the existing imbalance between the high dimensionality of the gene expression feature sets and the number of sam- ples available for a particular cancer type. To counteract what is known as the curse of dimensionality, feature selection and extraction methods have been traditionally applied to reduce the number of input variables present in gene expression datasets. Although these techniques work by scaling down the input feature space, the prediction performance of tradi- tional machine learning pipelines using these feature reduction strategies remains moderate. In this work, we propose the use of the Pan-Cancer dataset to pre-train deep autoencoder architectures on a subset com- posed of thousands of gene expression samples of very diverse tumor types. The resulting architectures are subsequently fine-tuned on a col- lection of specific breast cancer samples. This transfer-learning approach aims at combining supervised and unsupervised deep learning models with traditional machine learning classification algorithms to tackle the problem of breast tumor intrinsic-subtype classification.Universidad de Málaga. Campus de Excelencia Internacional Andalucía Tech

Machine Learning and Integrative Analysis of Biomedical Big Data.

Recent developments in high-throughput technologies have accelerated the accumulation of massive amounts of omics data from multiple sources: genome, epigenome, transcriptome, proteome, metabolome, etc. Traditionally, data from each source (e.g., genome) is analyzed in isolation using statistical and machine learning (ML) methods. Integrative analysis of multi-omics and clinical data is key to new biomedical discoveries and advancements in precision medicine. However, data integration poses new computational challenges as well as exacerbates the ones associated with single-omics studies. Specialized computational approaches are required to effectively and efficiently perform integrative analysis of biomedical data acquired from diverse modalities. In this review, we discuss state-of-the-art ML-based approaches for tackling five specific computational challenges associated with integrative analysis: curse of dimensionality, data heterogeneity, missing data, class imbalance and scalability issues

A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis

Deep learning algorithms, in particular convolutional networks, have rapidly become a methodology of choice for analyzing medical images. This paper reviews the major deep learning concepts pertinent to medical image analysis and summarizes over 300 contributions to the field, most of which appeared in the last year. We survey the use of deep learning for image classification, object detection, segmentation, registration, and other tasks and provide concise overviews of studies per application area. Open challenges and directions for future research are discussed.Comment: Revised survey includes expanded discussion section and reworked introductory section on common deep architectures. Added missed papers from before Feb 1st 201