The Impact of Word Representations on Sequential Neural MWE Identification

International audienceRecent initiatives such as the PARSEME shared task have allowed the rapid development of MWE identification systems. Many of those are based on recent NLP advances, using neural sequence models that take continuous word representations as input. We study two related questions in neural verbal MWE identification: (a) the use of lemmas and/or surface forms as input features, and (b) the use of word-based or character-based em-beddings to represent them. Our experiments on Basque, French, and Polish show that character-based representations yield systematically better results than word-based ones. In some cases, character-based representations of surface forms can be used as a proxy for lem-mas, depending on the morphological complexity of the language

Cross-lingual transfer learning and multitask learning for capturing multiword expressions

This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Association for Computational Linguistics in Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Multiword Expressions and WordNet (MWE-WN 2019), available online: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-5119 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.Recent developments in deep learning have prompted a surge of interest in the application of multitask and transfer learning to NLP problems. In this study, we explore for the first time, the application of transfer learning (TRL) and multitask learning (MTL) to the identification of Multiword Expressions (MWEs). For MTL, we exploit the shared syntactic information between MWE and dependency parsing models to jointly train a single model on both tasks. We specifically predict two types of labels: MWE and dependency parse. Our neural MTL architecture utilises the supervision of dependency parsing in lower layers and predicts MWE tags in upper layers. In the TRL scenario, we overcome the scarcity of data by learning a model on a larger MWE dataset and transferring the knowledge to a resource-poor setting in another language. In both scenarios, the resulting models achieved higher performance compared to standard neural approaches

Analysing Finnish Multi-Word Expressions with Word Embeddings

Sanayhdistelmät ovat useamman sanan kombinaatioita, jotka ovat jollakin tavalla jähmeitä ja/tai idiomaattisia. Tutkimuksessa tarkastellaan suomen kielen verbaalisia idiomeja sanaupotusmenetelmän (word2vec) avulla. Työn aineistona käytetään Gutenberg-projektista haettuja suomenkielisiä kirjoja. Työssä tutkitaan pääosin erityisesti idiomeja, joissa esiintyy suomen kielen sana ‘silmä’. Niiden idiomaattisuutta mitataan komposiittisuuden (kuinka hyvin sanayhdistelmän merkitys vastaa sen komponenttien merkitysten kombinaatiota) ja jähmeyttä leksikaalisen korvaustestin avulla. Vastaavat testit tehdään myös sanojen sisäisen rakenteen huomioonottavan fastText-algoritmin avulla. Työssä on myös luotu Gutenberg-korpuksen perusteella pienehkö luokiteltu lausejoukko, jota lajitellaan neuroverkkopohjaisen luokittelijan avulla. Tämä lisäksi työssä tunnustellaan eri ominaisuuksien kuten sijamuodon vaikutusta idiomin merkitykseen. Mittausmenetelmien tulokset ovat yleisesti ottaen varsin kirjavia. fastText-algoritmin suorituskyky on yleisesti ottaen hieman parempi kuin perusmenetelmän; sen lisäksi sanaupotusten laatu on parempi. Leksikaalinen korvaustesti antaa parhaimmat tulokset, kun vain lähin naapuri otetaan huomioon. Sijamuodon todettiin olevan varsin tärkeä idiomin merkityksen määrittämiseen. Mittauksien heikot tulokset voivat johtua monesta tekijästä, kuten siitä, että idiomien semanttisen läpinäkyvyyden aste voi vaihdella. Sanaupotusmenetelmä ei myöskään normaalisti ota huomioon sitä, että myös sanayhdistelmillä voi olla useita merkityksiä (kirjaimellinen ja idiomaattinen/kuvaannollinen). Suomen kielen rikas morfologia asettaa menetelmälle myös ylimääräisiä haasteita. Tuloksena voidaan sanoa, että sanaupotusmenetelmä on jokseenkin hyödyllinen suomen kielen idiomien tutkimiseen. Testattujen mittausmenetelmien käyttökelpoisuus yksin käytettynä on rajallinen, mutta ne saattaisivat toimia paremmin osana laajempaa tutkimusmekanismia

A Study of Metrics of Distance and Correlation Between Ranked Lists for Compositionality Detection

Compositionality in language refers to how much the meaning of some phrase can be decomposed into the meaning of its constituents and the way these constituents are combined. Based on the premise that substitution by synonyms is meaning-preserving, compositionality can be approximated as the semantic similarity between a phrase and a version of that phrase where words have been replaced by their synonyms. Different ways of representing such phrases exist (e.g., vectors [1] or language models [2]), and the choice of representation affects the measurement of semantic similarity. We propose a new compositionality detection method that represents phrases as ranked lists of term weights. Our method approximates the semantic similarity between two ranked list representations using a range of well-known distance and correlation metrics. In contrast to most state-of-the-art approaches in compositionality detection, our method is completely unsupervised. Experiments with a publicly available dataset of 1048 human-annotated phrases shows that, compared to strong supervised baselines, our approach provides superior measurement of compositionality using any of the distance and correlation metrics considered

Multiword expressions at length and in depth

The annual workshop on multiword expressions takes place since 2001 in conjunction with major computational linguistics conferences and attracts the attention of an ever-growing community working on a variety of languages, linguistic phenomena and related computational processing issues. MWE 2017 took place in Valencia, Spain, and represented a vibrant panorama of the current research landscape on the computational treatment of multiword expressions, featuring many high-quality submissions. Furthermore, MWE 2017 included the first shared task on multilingual identification of verbal multiword expressions. The shared task, with extended communal work, has developed important multilingual resources and mobilised several research groups in computational linguistics worldwide. This book contains extended versions of selected papers from the workshop. Authors worked hard to include detailed explanations, broader and deeper analyses, and new exciting results, which were thoroughly reviewed by an internationally renowned committee. We hope that this distinctly joint effort will provide a meaningful and useful snapshot of the multilingual state of the art in multiword expressions modelling and processing, and will be a point point of reference for future work

Bilingual contexts from comparable corpora to mine for translations of collocations

Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, CICLing2016Due to the limited availability of parallel data in many languages, we propose a methodology that benefits from comparable corpora to find translation equivalents for collocations (as a specific type of difficult-to-translate multi-word expressions). Finding translations is known to be more difficult for collocations than for words. We propose a method based on bilingual context extraction and build a word (distributional) representation model drawing on these bilingual contexts (bilingual English-Spanish contexts in our case). We show that the bilingual context construction is effective for the task of translation equivalent learning and that our method outperforms a simplified distributional similarity baseline in finding translation equivalents

Discovering multiword expressions

In this paper, we provide an overview of research on multiword expressions (MWEs), from a natural lan- guage processing perspective. We examine methods developed for modelling MWEs that capture some of their linguistic properties, discussing their use for MWE discovery and for idiomaticity detection. We con- centrate on their collocational and contextual preferences, along with their fixedness in terms of canonical forms and their lack of word-for-word translatatibility. We also discuss a sample of the MWE resources that have been used in intrinsic evaluation setups for these methods