When in doubt ask the crowd : leveraging collective intelligence for improving event detection and machine learning

[no abstract

Current Challenges in the Application of Algorithms in Multi-institutional Clinical Settings

The Coronavirus disease pandemic has highlighted the importance of artificial intelligence in multi-institutional clinical settings. Particularly in situations where the healthcare system is overloaded, and a lot of data is generated, artificial intelligence has great potential to provide automated solutions and to unlock the untapped potential of acquired data. This includes the areas of care, logistics, and diagnosis. For example, automated decision support applications could tremendously help physicians in their daily clinical routine. Especially in radiology and oncology, the exponential growth of imaging data, triggered by a rising number of patients, leads to a permanent overload of the healthcare system, making the use of artificial intelligence inevitable. However, the efficient and advantageous application of artificial intelligence in multi-institutional clinical settings faces several challenges, such as accountability and regulation hurdles, implementation challenges, and fairness considerations. This work focuses on the implementation challenges, which include the following questions: How to ensure well-curated and standardized data, how do algorithms from other domains perform on multi-institutional medical datasets, and how to train more robust and generalizable models? Also, questions of how to interpret results and whether there exist correlations between the performance of the models and the characteristics of the underlying data are part of the work. Therefore, besides presenting a technical solution for manual data annotation and tagging for medical images, a real-world federated learning implementation for image segmentation is introduced. Experiments on a multi-institutional prostate magnetic resonance imaging dataset showcase that models trained by federated learning can achieve similar performance to training on pooled data. Furthermore, Natural Language Processing algorithms with the tasks of semantic textual similarity, text classification, and text summarization are applied to multi-institutional, structured and free-text, oncology reports. The results show that performance gains are achieved by customizing state-of-the-art algorithms to the peculiarities of the medical datasets, such as the occurrence of medications, numbers, or dates. In addition, performance influences are observed depending on the characteristics of the data, such as lexical complexity. The generated results, human baselines, and retrospective human evaluations demonstrate that artificial intelligence algorithms have great potential for use in clinical settings. However, due to the difficulty of processing domain-specific data, there still exists a performance gap between the algorithms and the medical experts. In the future, it is therefore essential to improve the interoperability and standardization of data, as well as to continue working on algorithms to perform well on medical, possibly, domain-shifted data from multiple clinical centers

Semi-Supervised Active Learning for Sound Classification in Hybrid Learning Environments

Coping with scarcity of labeled data is a common problem in sound classification tasks. Approaches for classifying sounds are commonly based on supervised learning algorithms, which require labeled data which is often scarce and leads to models that do not generalize well. In this paper, we make an efficient combination of confidence-based Active Learning and Self-Training with the aim of minimizing the need for human annotation for sound classification model training. The proposed method pre-processes the instances that are ready for labeling by calculating their classifier confidence scores, and then delivers the candidates with lower scores to human annotators, and those with high scores are automatically labeled by the machine. We demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of this method in two practical scenarios: pool-based and stream-based processing. Extensive experimental results indicate that our approach requires significantly less labeled instances to reach the same performance in both scenarios compared to Passive Learning, Active Learning and Self-Training. A reduction of 52.2% in human labeled instances is achieved in both of the pool-based and stream-based scenarios on a sound classification task considering 16,930 sound instances

BSL-1K: Scaling up co-articulated sign language recognition using mouthing cues

Recent progress in fine-grained gesture and action classification, and machine translation, point to the possibility of automated sign language recognition becoming a reality. A key stumbling block in making progress towards this goal is a lack of appropriate training data, stemming from the high complexity of sign annotation and a limited supply of qualified annotators. In this work, we introduce a new scalable approach to data collection for sign recognition in continuous videos. We make use of weakly-aligned subtitles for broadcast footage together with a keyword spotting method to automatically localise sign-instances for a vocabulary of 1,000 signs in 1,000 hours of video. We make the following contributions: (1) We show how to use mouthing cues from signers to obtain high-quality annotations from video data - the result is the BSL-1K dataset, a collection of British Sign Language (BSL) signs of unprecedented scale; (2) We show that we can use BSL-1K to train strong sign recognition models for co-articulated signs in BSL and that these models additionally form excellent pretraining for other sign languages and benchmarks - we exceed the state of the art on both the MSASL and WLASL benchmarks. Finally, (3) we propose new large-scale evaluation sets for the tasks of sign recognition and sign spotting and provide baselines which we hope will serve to stimulate research in this area.Comment: Appears in: European Conference on Computer Vision 2020 (ECCV 2020). 28 page

Evaluation Methodologies for Visual Information Retrieval and Annotation

Die automatisierte Evaluation von Informations-Retrieval-Systemen erlaubt Performanz und Qualität der Informationsgewinnung zu bewerten. Bereits in den 60er Jahren wurden erste Methodologien für die system-basierte Evaluation aufgestellt und in den Cranfield Experimenten überprüft. Heutzutage gehören Evaluation, Test und Qualitätsbewertung zu einem aktiven Forschungsfeld mit erfolgreichen Evaluationskampagnen und etablierten Methoden. Evaluationsmethoden fanden zunächst in der Bewertung von Textanalyse-Systemen Anwendung. Mit dem rasanten Voranschreiten der Digitalisierung wurden diese Methoden sukzessive auf die Evaluation von Multimediaanalyse-Systeme übertragen. Dies geschah häufig, ohne die Evaluationsmethoden in Frage zu stellen oder sie an die veränderten Gegebenheiten der Multimediaanalyse anzupassen. Diese Arbeit beschäftigt sich mit der system-basierten Evaluation von Indizierungssystemen für Bildkollektionen. Sie adressiert drei Problemstellungen der Evaluation von Annotationen: Nutzeranforderungen für das Suchen und Verschlagworten von Bildern, Evaluationsmaße für die Qualitätsbewertung von Indizierungssystemen und Anforderungen an die Erstellung visueller Testkollektionen. Am Beispiel der Evaluation automatisierter Photo-Annotationsverfahren werden relevante Konzepte mit Bezug zu Nutzeranforderungen diskutiert, Möglichkeiten zur Erstellung einer zuverlässigen Ground Truth bei geringem Kosten- und Zeitaufwand vorgestellt und Evaluationsmaße zur Qualitätsbewertung eingeführt, analysiert und experimentell verglichen. Traditionelle Maße zur Ermittlung der Performanz werden in vier Dimensionen klassifiziert. Evaluationsmaße vergeben üblicherweise binäre Kosten für korrekte und falsche Annotationen. Diese Annahme steht im Widerspruch zu der Natur von Bildkonzepten. Das gemeinsame Auftreten von Bildkonzepten bestimmt ihren semantischen Zusammenhang und von daher sollten diese auch im Zusammenhang auf ihre Richtigkeit hin überprüft werden. In dieser Arbeit wird aufgezeigt, wie semantische Ähnlichkeiten visueller Konzepte automatisiert abgeschätzt und in den Evaluationsprozess eingebracht werden können. Die Ergebnisse der Arbeit inkludieren ein Nutzermodell für die konzeptbasierte Suche von Bildern, eine vollständig bewertete Testkollektion und neue Evaluationsmaße für die anforderungsgerechte Qualitätsbeurteilung von Bildanalysesystemen.Performance assessment plays a major role in the research on Information Retrieval (IR) systems. Starting with the Cranfield experiments in the early 60ies, methodologies for the system-based performance assessment emerged and established themselves, resulting in an active research field with a number of successful benchmarking activities. With the rise of the digital age, procedures of text retrieval evaluation were often transferred to multimedia retrieval evaluation without questioning their direct applicability. This thesis investigates the problem of system-based performance assessment of annotation approaches in generic image collections. It addresses three important parts of annotation evaluation, namely user requirements for the retrieval of annotated visual media, performance measures for multi-label evaluation, and visual test collections. Using the example of multi-label image annotation evaluation, I discuss which concepts to employ for indexing, how to obtain a reliable ground truth to moderate costs, and which evaluation measures are appropriate. This is accompanied by a thorough analysis of related work on system-based performance assessment in Visual Information Retrieval (VIR). Traditional performance measures are classified into four dimensions and investigated according to their appropriateness for visual annotation evaluation. One of the main ideas in this thesis adheres to the common assumption on the binary nature of the score prediction dimension in annotation evaluation. However, the predicted concepts and the set of true indexed concepts interrelate with each other. This work will show how to utilise these semantic relationships for a fine-grained evaluation scenario. Outcomes of this thesis result in a user model for concept-based image retrieval, a fully assessed image annotation test collection, and a number of novel performance measures for image annotation evaluation

Evaluation Methodologies for Visual Information Retrieval and Annotation

Die automatisierte Evaluation von Informations-Retrieval-Systemen erlaubt Performanz und Qualität der Informationsgewinnung zu bewerten. Bereits in den 60er Jahren wurden erste Methodologien für die system-basierte Evaluation aufgestellt und in den Cranfield Experimenten überprüft. Heutzutage gehören Evaluation, Test und Qualitätsbewertung zu einem aktiven Forschungsfeld mit erfolgreichen Evaluationskampagnen und etablierten Methoden. Evaluationsmethoden fanden zunächst in der Bewertung von Textanalyse-Systemen Anwendung. Mit dem rasanten Voranschreiten der Digitalisierung wurden diese Methoden sukzessive auf die Evaluation von Multimediaanalyse-Systeme übertragen. Dies geschah häufig, ohne die Evaluationsmethoden in Frage zu stellen oder sie an die veränderten Gegebenheiten der Multimediaanalyse anzupassen. Diese Arbeit beschäftigt sich mit der system-basierten Evaluation von Indizierungssystemen für Bildkollektionen. Sie adressiert drei Problemstellungen der Evaluation von Annotationen: Nutzeranforderungen für das Suchen und Verschlagworten von Bildern, Evaluationsmaße für die Qualitätsbewertung von Indizierungssystemen und Anforderungen an die Erstellung visueller Testkollektionen. Am Beispiel der Evaluation automatisierter Photo-Annotationsverfahren werden relevante Konzepte mit Bezug zu Nutzeranforderungen diskutiert, Möglichkeiten zur Erstellung einer zuverlässigen Ground Truth bei geringem Kosten- und Zeitaufwand vorgestellt und Evaluationsmaße zur Qualitätsbewertung eingeführt, analysiert und experimentell verglichen. Traditionelle Maße zur Ermittlung der Performanz werden in vier Dimensionen klassifiziert. Evaluationsmaße vergeben üblicherweise binäre Kosten für korrekte und falsche Annotationen. Diese Annahme steht im Widerspruch zu der Natur von Bildkonzepten. Das gemeinsame Auftreten von Bildkonzepten bestimmt ihren semantischen Zusammenhang und von daher sollten diese auch im Zusammenhang auf ihre Richtigkeit hin überprüft werden. In dieser Arbeit wird aufgezeigt, wie semantische Ähnlichkeiten visueller Konzepte automatisiert abgeschätzt und in den Evaluationsprozess eingebracht werden können. Die Ergebnisse der Arbeit inkludieren ein Nutzermodell für die konzeptbasierte Suche von Bildern, eine vollständig bewertete Testkollektion und neue Evaluationsmaße für die anforderungsgerechte Qualitätsbeurteilung von Bildanalysesystemen.Performance assessment plays a major role in the research on Information Retrieval (IR) systems. Starting with the Cranfield experiments in the early 60ies, methodologies for the system-based performance assessment emerged and established themselves, resulting in an active research field with a number of successful benchmarking activities. With the rise of the digital age, procedures of text retrieval evaluation were often transferred to multimedia retrieval evaluation without questioning their direct applicability. This thesis investigates the problem of system-based performance assessment of annotation approaches in generic image collections. It addresses three important parts of annotation evaluation, namely user requirements for the retrieval of annotated visual media, performance measures for multi-label evaluation, and visual test collections. Using the example of multi-label image annotation evaluation, I discuss which concepts to employ for indexing, how to obtain a reliable ground truth to moderate costs, and which evaluation measures are appropriate. This is accompanied by a thorough analysis of related work on system-based performance assessment in Visual Information Retrieval (VIR). Traditional performance measures are classified into four dimensions and investigated according to their appropriateness for visual annotation evaluation. One of the main ideas in this thesis adheres to the common assumption on the binary nature of the score prediction dimension in annotation evaluation. However, the predicted concepts and the set of true indexed concepts interrelate with each other. This work will show how to utilise these semantic relationships for a fine-grained evaluation scenario. Outcomes of this thesis result in a user model for concept-based image retrieval, a fully assessed image annotation test collection, and a number of novel performance measures for image annotation evaluation

A GENERAL MODEL FOR NOISY LABELS IN MACHINE LEARNING

Machine learning is an ever-growing and increasingly pervasive presence in every-day life; we entrust these models, and systems built on these models, with some of our most sensitive information and security applications. However, for all of the trust that we place in these models, it is essential to recognize the fact that such models are simply reflections of the data and labels on which they are trained. To wit, if the data and labels are suspect, then so too must be the models that we rely on—yet, as larger and more comprehensive datasets become standard in contemporary machine learning, it becomes increasingly more difficult to obtain reliable, trustworthy label information. While recent work has begun to investigate mitigating the effect of noisy labels, to date this critical field has been disjointed and disconnected, despite the common goal. In this work, we propose a new model of label noise, which we call “labeler-dependent noise (LDN).” LDN extends and generalizes the canonical instance-dependent noise model to multiple labelers, and unifies every pre-ceding modeling strategy under a single umbrella. Furthermore, studying the LDN model leads us to propose a more general, modular framework for noise-robust learning called “labeler-aware learning (LAL).” Our comprehensive suite of experiments demonstrate that unlike previous methods that are unable to remain robust under the general LDN model, LAL retains its full learning capabilities under extreme, and even adversarial, conditions of label noise. We believe that LDN and LAL should mark a paradigm shift in how we learn from labeled data, so that we may both discover new insights about machine learning, and develop more robust, trustworthy models on which to build our daily lives