395 research outputs found
Cross-lingual RST Discourse Parsing
Discourse parsing is an integral part of understanding information flow and
argumentative structure in documents. Most previous research has focused on
inducing and evaluating models from the English RST Discourse Treebank.
However, discourse treebanks for other languages exist, including Spanish,
German, Basque, Dutch and Brazilian Portuguese. The treebanks share the same
underlying linguistic theory, but differ slightly in the way documents are
annotated. In this paper, we present (a) a new discourse parser which is
simpler, yet competitive (significantly better on 2/3 metrics) to state of the
art for English, (b) a harmonization of discourse treebanks across languages,
enabling us to present (c) what to the best of our knowledge are the first
experiments on cross-lingual discourse parsing.Comment: To be published in EACL 2017, 13 page
Cross-lingual and cross-domain discourse segmentation of entire documents
Discourse segmentation is a crucial step in building end-to-end discourse
parsers. However, discourse segmenters only exist for a few languages and
domains. Typically they only detect intra-sentential segment boundaries,
assuming gold standard sentence and token segmentation, and relying on
high-quality syntactic parses and rich heuristics that are not generally
available across languages and domains. In this paper, we propose statistical
discourse segmenters for five languages and three domains that do not rely on
gold pre-annotations. We also consider the problem of learning discourse
segmenters when no labeled data is available for a language. Our fully
supervised system obtains 89.5% F1 for English newswire, with slight drops in
performance on other domains, and we report supervised and unsupervised
(cross-lingual) results for five languages in total.Comment: To appear in Proceedings of ACL 201
Better Document-level Sentiment Analysis from RST Discourse Parsing
Discourse structure is the hidden link between surface features and
document-level properties, such as sentiment polarity. We show that the
discourse analyses produced by Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) parsers can
improve document-level sentiment analysis, via composition of local information
up the discourse tree. First, we show that reweighting discourse units
according to their position in a dependency representation of the rhetorical
structure can yield substantial improvements on lexicon-based sentiment
analysis. Next, we present a recursive neural network over the RST structure,
which offers significant improvements over classification-based methods.Comment: Published at Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP
2015
Does syntax help discourse segmentation? Not so much
International audienceDiscourse segmentation is the first step in building discourse parsers. Most work on discourse segmentation does not scale to real-world discourse parsing across languages , for two reasons: (i) models rely on constituent trees, and (ii) experiments have relied on gold standard identification of sentence and token boundaries. We therefore investigate to what extent constituents can be replaced with universal dependencies , or left out completely, as well as how state-of-the-art segmenters fare in the absence of sentence boundaries. Our results show that dependency information is less useful than expected, but we provide a fully scalable, robust model that only relies on part-of-speech information, and show that it performs well across languages in the absence of any gold-standard annotation
Does syntax help discourse segmentation? Not so much
International audienceDiscourse segmentation is the first step in building discourse parsers. Most work on discourse segmentation does not scale to real-world discourse parsing across languages , for two reasons: (i) models rely on constituent trees, and (ii) experiments have relied on gold standard identification of sentence and token boundaries. We therefore investigate to what extent constituents can be replaced with universal dependencies , or left out completely, as well as how state-of-the-art segmenters fare in the absence of sentence boundaries. Our results show that dependency information is less useful than expected, but we provide a fully scalable, robust model that only relies on part-of-speech information, and show that it performs well across languages in the absence of any gold-standard annotation
What's Hard in English RST Parsing? Predictive Models for Error Analysis
Despite recent advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP), hierarchical
discourse parsing in the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory remains
challenging, and our understanding of the reasons for this are as yet limited.
In this paper, we examine and model some of the factors associated with parsing
difficulties in previous work: the existence of implicit discourse relations,
challenges in identifying long-distance relations, out-of-vocabulary items, and
more. In order to assess the relative importance of these variables, we also
release two annotated English test-sets with explicit correct and distracting
discourse markers associated with gold standard RST relations. Our results show
that as in shallow discourse parsing, the explicit/implicit distinction plays a
role, but that long-distance dependencies are the main challenge, while lack of
lexical overlap is less of a problem, at least for in-domain parsing. Our final
model is able to predict where errors will occur with an accuracy of 76.3% for
the bottom-up parser and 76.6% for the top-down parser.Comment: SIGDIAL 2023 camera-ready; 12 page
Discourse parsing for multi-party chat dialogues
In this paper we present the first ever, to the best of our knowledge, discourse parser for multi-party chat dialogues. Discourse in multi-party dialogues dramatically differs from monologues since threaded conversations are commonplace rendering prediction of the discourse structure compelling. Moreover, the fact that our data come from chats renders the use of syntactic and lexical information useless since people take great liberties in expressing themselves lexically and syntactically. We use the dependency parsing paradigm as has been done in the past (Muller et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014). We learn local probability distributions and then use MST for decoding. We achieve 0.680 F 1 on unlabelled structures and 0.516 F 1 on fully labeled structures which is better than many state of the art systems for monologues, despite the inherent difficulties that multi-party chat dialogues have
Joint Syntacto-Discourse Parsing and the Syntacto-Discourse Treebank
Discourse parsing has long been treated as a stand-alone problem independent
from constituency or dependency parsing. Most attempts at this problem are
pipelined rather than end-to-end, sophisticated, and not self-contained: they
assume gold-standard text segmentations (Elementary Discourse Units), and use
external parsers for syntactic features. In this paper we propose the first
end-to-end discourse parser that jointly parses in both syntax and discourse
levels, as well as the first syntacto-discourse treebank by integrating the
Penn Treebank with the RST Treebank. Built upon our recent span-based
constituency parser, this joint syntacto-discourse parser requires no
preprocessing whatsoever (such as segmentation or feature extraction), achieves
the state-of-the-art end-to-end discourse parsing accuracy.Comment: Accepted at EMNLP 201
Improving Topic Segmentation by Injecting Discourse Dependencies
Recent neural supervised topic segmentation models achieve distinguished
superior effectiveness over unsupervised methods, with the availability of
large-scale training corpora sampled from Wikipedia. These models may, however,
suffer from limited robustness and transferability caused by exploiting simple
linguistic cues for prediction, but overlooking more important inter-sentential
topical consistency. To address this issue, we present a discourse-aware neural
topic segmentation model with the injection of above-sentence discourse
dependency structures to encourage the model make topic boundary prediction
based more on the topical consistency between sentences. Our empirical study on
English evaluation datasets shows that injecting above-sentence discourse
structures to a neural topic segmenter with our proposed strategy can
substantially improve its performances on intra-domain and out-of-domain data,
with little increase of model's complexity.Comment: Accepted to the 3rd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Discourse
(CODI-2022) at COLING 202
- …