344 research outputs found

    Collective additive tree spanners for circle graphs and polygonal graphs

    Get PDF
    AbstractA graph G=(V,E) is said to admit a system of μ collective additive tree r-spanners if there is a system T(G) of at most μ spanning trees of G such that for any two vertices u,v of G a spanning tree T∈T(G) exists such that the distance in T between u and v is at most r plus their distance in G. In this paper, we examine the problem of finding “small” systems of collective additive tree r-spanners for small values of r on circle graphs and on polygonal graphs. Among other results, we show that every n-vertex circle graph admits a system of at most 2log32n collective additive tree 2-spanners and every n-vertex k-polygonal graph admits a system of at most 2log32k+7 collective additive tree 2-spanners. Moreover, we show that every n-vertex k-polygonal graph admits an additive (k+6)-spanner with at most 6n−6 edges and every n-vertex 3-polygonal graph admits a system of at most three collective additive tree 2-spanners and an additive tree 6-spanner. All our collective tree spanners as well as all sparse spanners are constructible in polynomial time

    Isometric Embeddings in Trees and Their Use in Distance Problems

    Get PDF
    International audienceWe present powerful techniques for computing the diameter, all the eccentricities, and other related distance problems on some geometric graph classes, by exploiting their "tree-likeness" properties. We illustrate the usefulness of our approach as follows: (1) We propose a subquadratic-time algorithm for computing all eccentricities on partial cubes of bounded lattice dimension and isometric dimension O(n^{0.5−ε}). This is one of the first positive results achieved for the diameter problem on a subclass of partial cubes beyond median graphs. (2) Then, we obtain almost linear-time algorithms for computing all eccentricities in some classes of face-regular plane graphs, including benzenoid systems, with applications to chemistry. Previously, only a linear-time algorithm for computing the diameter and the center was known (and an O(n^{5/3})-time algorithm for computing all the eccentricities). (3) We also present an almost linear-time algorithm for computing the eccentricities in a polygon graph with an additive one-sided error of at most 2. (4) Finally, on any cube-free median graph, we can compute its absolute center in almost linear time. Independently from this work, Bergé and Habib have recently presented a linear-time algorithm for computing all eccentricities in this graph class (LAGOS'21), which also implies a linear-time algorithm for the absolute center problem. Our strategy here consists in exploiting the existence of some embeddings of these graphs in either a system or a product of trees, or in a single tree but where each vertex of the graph is embedded in a subset of nodes. While this may look like a natural idea, the way it can be done efficiently, which is our main technical contribution in the paper, is surprisingly intricate

    Multi-Level Weighted Additive Spanners

    Get PDF
    Given a graph G = (V, E), a subgraph H is an additive +β spanner if distH(u, v) ≤ distG(u, v) + β for all u, v ∈ V. A pairwise spanner is a spanner for which the above inequality is only required to hold for specific pairs P ⊆ V × V given on input; when the pairs have the structure P = S × S for some S ⊆ V, it is called a subsetwise spanner. Additive spanners in unweighted graphs have been studied extensively in the literature, but have only recently been generalized to weighted graphs. In this paper, we consider a multi-level version of the subsetwise additive spanner in weighted graphs motivated by multi-level network design and visualization, where the vertices in S possess varying level, priority, or quality of service (QoS) requirements. The goal is to compute a nested sequence of spanners with the minimum total number of edges. We first generalize the +2 subsetwise spanner of [Pettie 2008, Cygan et al., 2013] to the weighted setting. We experimentally measure the performance of this and several existing algorithms by [Ahmed et al., 2020] for weighted additive spanners, both in terms of runtime and sparsity of the output spanner, when applied as a subroutine to multi-level problem. We provide an experimental evaluation on graphs using several different random graph generators and show that these spanner algorithms typically achieve much better guarantees in terms of sparsity and additive error compared with the theoretical maximum. By analyzing our experimental results, we additionally developed a new technique of changing a certain initialization parameter which provides better spanners in practice at the expense of a small increase in running time. © Reyan Ahmed, Greg Bodwin, Faryad Darabi Sahneh, Keaton Hamm, Stephen Kobourov, and Richard Spence; licensed under Creative Commons License CC-BY 4.0 19th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2021).Open access journalThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]
    corecore