1,657 research outputs found

    ์†Œ์…œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์™€ ์ด์ปค๋จธ์Šค ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์—์„œ์˜ ์ž ์žฌ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋งˆ์ด๋‹

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2023. 2. ๊ถŒํƒœ๊ฒฝ.์›น ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์„œ๋น„์Šค์˜ ํญ๋ฐœ์ ์ธ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋“ค์€ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ์ƒ์—์„œ ํญ๋„“๊ฒŒ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ์ƒ์—์„œ, ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋“ค์€ ์„œ๋กœ์—๊ฒŒ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๊ณ ๋ฐ›์œผ๋ฉฐ ์˜์‚ฌ ๊ฒฐ์ •์— ๊ทธ๋“ค์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜๊ณผ ์˜๊ฒฌ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ธ ์†Œ์…œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์„œ๋น„์Šค์™€ ์ด์ปค๋จธ์Šค ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์—์„œ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ํ–‰๋™์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์—์„œ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ํ–‰๋™์€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์™€ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ๊ตฌ๋งค๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์™€ ์ƒํ’ˆ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋กœ, ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์ฒดํฌ์ธ์€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์™€ ์žฅ์†Œ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์ง„๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์— ํ–‰๋™์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ๋ ˆ์ดํŒ…, ํƒœ๊ทธ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‘ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์—์„œ ์ •์˜๋œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ํ–‰๋™ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์ž ์žฌ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ์œ„์น˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์†Œ์…œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์„œ๋น„์Šค์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํŠน์ • ์žฅ์†Œ์— ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธํ•˜๋Š” ์ฒดํฌ์ธ ํ˜•์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋งŽ์€ ํฌ์ŠคํŠธ๊ฐ€ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์ง€๋Š”๋ฐ, ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์žฅ์†Œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธ์€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ๊ฐ„์— ์‚ฌ์ „์— ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ์นœ๊ตฌ ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋ฐ›๋Š”๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ํ™œ๋™ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ์ €๋ณ€์— ์ž ์žฌ๋œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ํ™œ๋™ ์˜ˆ์ธก์— ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋น„์ง€๋„ํ•™์Šต ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ๋™ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์— ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ๋˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์€ ๋‘ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋™์‹œ์— ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธํ•˜๋Š” ํ–‰์œ„์ธ co-visitation์„ ์ค‘์ ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์ž„๋ฒ ๋”ฉ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง(GNN)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‘œํ˜„ ํ•™์Šต์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ์ฃผ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธ์ด๋‚˜ ์žฅ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ์ด๋™ ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ๋˜๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ํ–‰๋™ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ์ž˜ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ–‰๋™ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋” ์ž˜ ํ•™์Šตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ANES๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ปจํ…์ŠคํŠธ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์™€ ๊ด€์‹ฌ ์ง€์ (POI) ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด(Aspect) ์ง€ํ–ฅ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ•™์Šตํ•œ๋‹ค. ANES๋Š” User-POI ์ด๋ถ„ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ํ–‰๋™์„ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„๊ณ , ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ํ–‰๋™ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ์ถ”์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ์ตœ์ดˆ์˜ ๋น„์ง€๋„ํ•™์Šต ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ LBSN ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ, ANES๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์— ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ๋˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค๋ณด๋‹ค ๋†’์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ์œ„์น˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์†Œ์…œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์™€๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ, ์ด์ปค๋จธ์Šค์˜ ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋“ค์ด ๋Šฅ๋™์ ์ธ ํŒ”๋กœ์šฐ/ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ๋“ฑ์˜ ํ–‰์œ„๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ ๋„ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์„œ๋กœ์˜ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ฃผ๊ณ ๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ์„ ํ–‰์‚ฌํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋“ค์˜ ํ–‰๋™ ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ ์ŠคํŒธ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์•…์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ ์ŠคํŒธ์€ ์‹ค์ œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์˜๊ฒฌ์„ ์ˆจ๊ธฐ๊ณ  ํ‰์ ์„ ์กฐ์ž‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž˜๋ชป๋œ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ „๋‹ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„๋‹ค. ๋‚˜๋Š” ์ด๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์‚ฌ์ „ ๊ณต๋ชจ์„ฑ(Collusiveness)์˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์ฐพ๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ์ŠคํŒธ ํƒ์ง€์— ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ธ SC-Com์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. SC-Com์€ ํ–‰๋™์˜ ๊ณต๋ชจ์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ๊ณต๋ชจ ์ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•ด๋‹น ์ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ „์ฒด ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋ฅผ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋“ค์˜ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ํ›„ ์ŠคํŒธ ์œ ์ €์™€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์œ ์ €๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ๋ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ํŠน์ง•์„ ์ถ”์ถœํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ๋… ํ•™์Šต ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๊ธฐ์˜ ์ž…๋ ฅ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. SC-Com์€ ๊ณต๋ชจ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ์ŠคํŒธ ์œ ์ €์˜ ์ง‘ํ•ฉ์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํƒ์ง€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ, SC-Com์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ๋“ค ๋Œ€๋น„ ์ŠคํŒธ ํƒ์ง€์— ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋œ ์•”์‹œ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋ง ํƒ์ง€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋ ˆ์ด๋ธ”์ด ์—†๋Š” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋„ ์‚ฌ์ „์— ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋˜์—ˆ์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’์€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋“ค์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ, ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์œ„์น˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋‚˜, ์•ฑ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์—์„œ ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ด‘๊ณ  ์ถ”์ฒœ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด๋‚˜, ์•…์„ฑ ์œ ์ € ํƒ์ง€ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•œ๋‹ค.Following the exploding usage on online services, people are connected with each other more broadly and widely. In online platforms, people influence each other, and have tendency to reflect their opinions in decision-making. Social Network Services (SNSs) and E-commerce are typical example of online platforms. User behaviors in online platforms can be defined as relation between user and platform components. A user's purchase is a relationship between a user and a product, and a user's check-in is a relationship between a user and a place. Here, information such as action time, rating, tag, etc. may be included. In many studies, platform user behavior is represented in graph form. At this time, the elements constituting the nodes of the graph are composed of objects such as users and products and places within the platform, and the interaction between the platform elements and the user can be expressed as two nodes being connected. In this study, I present studies to identify potential networks that affect the user's behavior graph defined on the two platforms. In ANES, I focus on representation learning for social link inference based on user trajectory data. While traditional methods predict relations between users by considering hand-crafted features, recent studies first perform representation learning using network/node embedding or graph neural networks (GNNs) for downstream tasks such as node classification and link prediction. However, those approaches fail to capture behavioral patterns of individuals ingrained in periodical visits or long-distance movements. To better learn behavioral patterns, this paper proposes a novel scheme called ANES (Aspect-oriented Network Embedding for Social link inference). ANES learns aspect-oriented relations between users and Point-of-Interests (POIs) within their contexts. ANES is the first approach that extracts the complex behavioral pattern of users from both trajectory data and the structure of User-POI bipartite graphs. Extensive experiments on several real-world datasets show that ANES outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. In contrast to active social networks, people are connected to other users regardless of their intentions in some platforms, such as online shopping websites and restaurant review sites. They do not have any information about each other in advance, and they only have a common point which is that they have visited or have planned to visit same place or purchase a product. Interestingly, users have tendency to be influenced by the review data on their purchase intentions. Unfortunately, this instinct is easily exploited by opinion spammers. In SC-Com, I focus on opinion spam detection in online shopping services. In many cases, my decision-making process is closely related to online reviews. However, there have been threats of opinion spams by hired reviewers increasingly, which aim to mislead potential customers by hiding genuine consumers opinions. Opinion spams should be filed up collectively to falsify true information. Fortunately, I propose the way to spot the possibility to detect them from their collusiveness. In this paper, I propose SC-Com, an optimized collusive community detection framework. It constructs the graph of reviewers from the collusiveness of behavior and divides a graph by communities based on their mutual suspiciousness. After that, I extract community-based and temporal abnormality features which are critical to discriminate spammers from other genuine users. I show that my method detects collusive opinion spam reviewers effectively and precisely from their collective behavioral patterns. In the real-world dataset, my approach showed prominent performance while only considering primary data such as time and ratings. These implicit network inference models studied on various data in this thesis predicts users who are likely to be pre-connected to unlabeled data, so it is expected to contribute to areas such as advertising recommendation systems and malicious user detection by providing useful information.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Social link Inference in Location-based check-in data 5 2.1 Background 5 2.2 Related Work 12 2.3 Location-based Social Network Service Data 15 2.4 Aspect-wise Graph Decomposition 18 2.5 Aspect-wise Graph learning 19 2.6 Inferring Social Relation from User Representation 21 2.7 Performance Analysis 23 2.8 Discussion and Implications 26 2.9 Summary 34 Chapter 3 Detecting collusiveness from reviews in Online platforms and its application 35 3.1 Background 35 3.2 Related Work 39 3.3 Online Review Data 43 3.4 Collusive Graph Projection 44 3.5 Reviewer Community Detection 47 3.6 Review Community feature extraction and spammer detection 51 3.7 Performance Analysis 53 3.8 Discussion and Implications 55 3.9 Summary 62 Chapter 4 Conclusion 63๋ฐ•

    Graph-based Security and Privacy Analytics via Collective Classification with Joint Weight Learning and Propagation

    Full text link
    Many security and privacy problems can be modeled as a graph classification problem, where nodes in the graph are classified by collective classification simultaneously. State-of-the-art collective classification methods for such graph-based security and privacy analytics follow the following paradigm: assign weights to edges of the graph, iteratively propagate reputation scores of nodes among the weighted graph, and use the final reputation scores to classify nodes in the graph. The key challenge is to assign edge weights such that an edge has a large weight if the two corresponding nodes have the same label, and a small weight otherwise. Although collective classification has been studied and applied for security and privacy problems for more than a decade, how to address this challenge is still an open question. In this work, we propose a novel collective classification framework to address this long-standing challenge. We first formulate learning edge weights as an optimization problem, which quantifies the goals about the final reputation scores that we aim to achieve. However, it is computationally hard to solve the optimization problem because the final reputation scores depend on the edge weights in a very complex way. To address the computational challenge, we propose to jointly learn the edge weights and propagate the reputation scores, which is essentially an approximate solution to the optimization problem. We compare our framework with state-of-the-art methods for graph-based security and privacy analytics using four large-scale real-world datasets from various application scenarios such as Sybil detection in social networks, fake review detection in Yelp, and attribute inference attacks. Our results demonstrate that our framework achieves higher accuracies than state-of-the-art methods with an acceptable computational overhead.Comment: Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS), 2019. Dataset link: http://gonglab.pratt.duke.edu/code-dat

    Graph based Anomaly Detection and Description: A Survey

    Get PDF
    Detecting anomalies in data is a vital task, with numerous high-impact applications in areas such as security, finance, health care, and law enforcement. While numerous techniques have been developed in past years for spotting outliers and anomalies in unstructured collections of multi-dimensional points, with graph data becoming ubiquitous, techniques for structured graph data have been of focus recently. As objects in graphs have long-range correlations, a suite of novel technology has been developed for anomaly detection in graph data. This survey aims to provide a general, comprehensive, and structured overview of the state-of-the-art methods for anomaly detection in data represented as graphs. As a key contribution, we give a general framework for the algorithms categorized under various settings: unsupervised vs. (semi-)supervised approaches, for static vs. dynamic graphs, for attributed vs. plain graphs. We highlight the effectiveness, scalability, generality, and robustness aspects of the methods. What is more, we stress the importance of anomaly attribution and highlight the major techniques that facilitate digging out the root cause, or the โ€˜whyโ€™, of the detected anomalies for further analysis and sense-making. Finally, we present several real-world applications of graph-based anomaly detection in diverse domains, including financial, auction, computer traffic, and social networks. We conclude our survey with a discussion on open theoretical and practical challenges in the field

    Graph Mining for Cybersecurity: A Survey

    Full text link
    The explosive growth of cyber attacks nowadays, such as malware, spam, and intrusions, caused severe consequences on society. Securing cyberspace has become an utmost concern for organizations and governments. Traditional Machine Learning (ML) based methods are extensively used in detecting cyber threats, but they hardly model the correlations between real-world cyber entities. In recent years, with the proliferation of graph mining techniques, many researchers investigated these techniques for capturing correlations between cyber entities and achieving high performance. It is imperative to summarize existing graph-based cybersecurity solutions to provide a guide for future studies. Therefore, as a key contribution of this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of graph mining for cybersecurity, including an overview of cybersecurity tasks, the typical graph mining techniques, and the general process of applying them to cybersecurity, as well as various solutions for different cybersecurity tasks. For each task, we probe into relevant methods and highlight the graph types, graph approaches, and task levels in their modeling. Furthermore, we collect open datasets and toolkits for graph-based cybersecurity. Finally, we outlook the potential directions of this field for future research
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore