43 research outputs found

    Complements of coalescing sets

    Full text link
    We consider matrices of the form qD+AqD+A, with DD being the diagonal matrix of degrees, AA being the adjacency matrix, and qq a fixed value. Given a graph HH and BβŠ†V(G)B\subseteq V(G), which we call a coalescent pair (H,B)(H,B), we derive a formula for the characteristic polynomial where a copy of same rooted graph GG is attached by the root to \emph{each} vertex of BB. Moreover, we establish if (H1,B1)(H_1,B_1) and (H2,B2)(H_2,B_2) are two coalescent pairs which are cospectral for any possible rooted graph GG, then (H1,V(H1)βˆ–B1)(H_1,V(H_1)\setminus B_1) and (H2,V(H2)βˆ–B2)(H_2,V(H_2)\setminus B_2) will also always be cospectral for any possible rooted graph GG.Comment: 16 page

    On the Laplacian and Signless Laplacian Characteristic Polynomials of a Digraph

    Get PDF
    Let D be a digraph with n vertices and a arcs. The Laplacian and the signless Laplacian matrices of D are, respectively, defined as L(D)=Deg+(D)βˆ’A(D) and Q(D)=Deg+(D)+A(D), where A(D) represents the adjacency matrix and Deg+(D) represents the diagonal matrix whose diagonal elements are the out-degrees of the vertices in D. We derive a combinatorial representation regarding the first few coefficients of the (signless) Laplacian characteristic polynomial of D. We provide concrete directed motifs to highlight some applications and implications of our results. The paper is concluded with digraph examples demonstrating detailed calculations

    On the sum of the two largest signless Laplacian eigenvalues

    Full text link
    Let GG be a simple connected graph and let Sk(G)S_k(G) be the sum of the first kk largest signless Laplacian eigenvalues of GG. It was conjectured by Ashraf, Omidi and Tayfeh-Rezaibe in 2013 that Sk(G)≀e(G)+(k+12)S_k(G)\leq e(G)+\binom{k+1}{2} holds for 1≀k≀nβˆ’11\leq k\leq n-1. They gave a proof for the conjecture when k=2k = 2, but applied an incorrect key lemma. Therefore, the conjecture is still open when k=2k = 2. In this paper, we prove that S2(G)<e(G)+3S_2(G)<e(G)+3 is true for any graphs which also confirm the conjecture when k=2k = 2.Comment: 15 pages, 5 figure
    corecore