562 research outputs found
Deep Learning in Breast Cancer Imaging: A Decade of Progress and Future Directions
Breast cancer has reached the highest incidence rate worldwide among all
malignancies since 2020. Breast imaging plays a significant role in early
diagnosis and intervention to improve the outcome of breast cancer patients. In
the past decade, deep learning has shown remarkable progress in breast cancer
imaging analysis, holding great promise in interpreting the rich information
and complex context of breast imaging modalities. Considering the rapid
improvement in the deep learning technology and the increasing severity of
breast cancer, it is critical to summarize past progress and identify future
challenges to be addressed. In this paper, we provide an extensive survey of
deep learning-based breast cancer imaging research, covering studies on
mammogram, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and digital pathology images
over the past decade. The major deep learning methods, publicly available
datasets, and applications on imaging-based screening, diagnosis, treatment
response prediction, and prognosis are described in detail. Drawn from the
findings of this survey, we present a comprehensive discussion of the
challenges and potential avenues for future research in deep learning-based
breast cancer imaging.Comment: Survey, 41 page
CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparison
Large, labeled datasets have driven deep learning methods to achieve
expert-level performance on a variety of medical imaging tasks. We present
CheXpert, a large dataset that contains 224,316 chest radiographs of 65,240
patients. We design a labeler to automatically detect the presence of 14
observations in radiology reports, capturing uncertainties inherent in
radiograph interpretation. We investigate different approaches to using the
uncertainty labels for training convolutional neural networks that output the
probability of these observations given the available frontal and lateral
radiographs. On a validation set of 200 chest radiographic studies which were
manually annotated by 3 board-certified radiologists, we find that different
uncertainty approaches are useful for different pathologies. We then evaluate
our best model on a test set composed of 500 chest radiographic studies
annotated by a consensus of 5 board-certified radiologists, and compare the
performance of our model to that of 3 additional radiologists in the detection
of 5 selected pathologies. On Cardiomegaly, Edema, and Pleural Effusion, the
model ROC and PR curves lie above all 3 radiologist operating points. We
release the dataset to the public as a standard benchmark to evaluate
performance of chest radiograph interpretation models.
The dataset is freely available at
https://stanfordmlgroup.github.io/competitions/chexpert .Comment: Published in AAAI 201
- …