14 research outputs found
Coinductive Formal Reasoning in Exact Real Arithmetic
In this article we present a method for formally proving the correctness of
the lazy algorithms for computing homographic and quadratic transformations --
of which field operations are special cases-- on a representation of real
numbers by coinductive streams. The algorithms work on coinductive stream of
M\"{o}bius maps and form the basis of the Edalat--Potts exact real arithmetic.
We use the machinery of the Coq proof assistant for the coinductive types to
present the formalisation. The formalised algorithms are only partially
productive, i.e., they do not output provably infinite streams for all possible
inputs. We show how to deal with this partiality in the presence of syntactic
restrictions posed by the constructive type theory of Coq. Furthermore we show
that the type theoretic techniques that we develop are compatible with the
semantics of the algorithms as continuous maps on real numbers. The resulting
Coq formalisation is available for public download.Comment: 40 page
Sound and complete axiomatizations of coalgebraic language equivalence
Coalgebras provide a uniform framework to study dynamical systems, including
several types of automata. In this paper, we make use of the coalgebraic view
on systems to investigate, in a uniform way, under which conditions calculi
that are sound and complete with respect to behavioral equivalence can be
extended to a coarser coalgebraic language equivalence, which arises from a
generalised powerset construction that determinises coalgebras. We show that
soundness and completeness are established by proving that expressions modulo
axioms of a calculus form the rational fixpoint of the given type functor. Our
main result is that the rational fixpoint of the functor , where is a
monad describing the branching of the systems (e.g. non-determinism, weights,
probability etc.), has as a quotient the rational fixpoint of the
"determinised" type functor , a lifting of to the category of
-algebras. We apply our framework to the concrete example of weighted
automata, for which we present a new sound and complete calculus for weighted
language equivalence. As a special case, we obtain non-deterministic automata,
where we recover Rabinovich's sound and complete calculus for language
equivalence.Comment: Corrected version of published journal articl
Dualities in modal logic
Categorical dualities are an important tool in the study of (modal) logics. They offer conceptual understanding and enable the transfer of results between the different semantics of a logic. As such, they play a central role in the proofs of completeness theorems, Sahlqvist theorems and Goldblatt-Thomason theorems. A common way to obtain dualities is by extending existing ones. For example, Jonsson-Tarski duality is an extension of Stone duality. A convenient formalism to carry out such extensions is given by the dual categorical notions of algebras and coalgebras. Intuitively, these allow one to isolate the new part of a duality from the existing part. In this thesis we will derive both existing and new dualities via this route, and we show how to use the dualities to investigate logics. However, not all (modal logical) paradigms fit the (co)algebraic perspective. In particular, modal intuitionistic logics do not enjoy a coalgebraic treatment, and there is a general lack of duality results for them. To remedy this, we use a generalisation of both algebras and coalgebras called dialgebras. Guided by the research field of coalgebraic logic, we introduce the framework of dialgebraic logic. We show how a large class of modal intuitionistic logics can be modelled as dialgebraic logics and we prove dualities for them. We use the dialgebraic framework to prove general completeness, Hennessy-Milner, representation and Goldblatt-Thomason theorems, and instantiate this to a wide variety of modal intuitionistic logics. Additionally, we use the dialgebraic perspective to investigate modal extensions of the meet-implication fragment of intuitionistic logic. We instantiate general dialgebraic results, and describe how modal meet-implication logics relate to modal intuitionistic logics