Combining Static and Dynamic Features for Multivariate Sequence Classification

Model precision in a classification task is highly dependent on the feature space that is used to train the model. Moreover, whether the features are sequential or static will dictate which classification method can be applied as most of the machine learning algorithms are designed to deal with either one or another type of data. In real-life scenarios, however, it is often the case that both static and dynamic features are present, or can be extracted from the data. In this work, we demonstrate how generative models such as Hidden Markov Models (HMM) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) artificial neural networks can be used to extract temporal information from the dynamic data. We explore how the extracted information can be combined with the static features in order to improve the classification performance. We evaluate the existing techniques and suggest a hybrid approach, which outperforms other methods on several public datasets.Comment: Presented at IEEE DSAA 201

Formal Verification of Input-Output Mappings of Tree Ensembles

Recent advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence are now being considered in safety-critical autonomous systems where software defects may cause severe harm to humans and the environment. Design organizations in these domains are currently unable to provide convincing arguments that their systems are safe to operate when machine learning algorithms are used to implement their software. In this paper, we present an efficient method to extract equivalence classes from decision trees and tree ensembles, and to formally verify that their input-output mappings comply with requirements. The idea is that, given that safety requirements can be traced to desirable properties on system input-output patterns, we can use positive verification outcomes in safety arguments. This paper presents the implementation of the method in the tool VoTE (Verifier of Tree Ensembles), and evaluates its scalability on two case studies presented in current literature. We demonstrate that our method is practical for tree ensembles trained on low-dimensional data with up to 25 decision trees and tree depths of up to 20. Our work also studies the limitations of the method with high-dimensional data and preliminarily investigates the trade-off between large number of trees and time taken for verification