Classification of C3 and C4 Vegetation Types Using MODIS and ETM+ Blended High Spatio-Temporal Resolution Data

The distribution of C3 and C4 vegetation plays an important role in the global carbon cycle and climate change. Knowledge of the distribution of C3 and C4 vegetation at a high spatial resolution over local or regional scales helps us to understand their ecological functions and climate dependencies. In this study, we classified C3 and C4 vegetation at a high resolution for spatially heterogeneous landscapes. First, we generated a high spatial and temporal land surface reflectance dataset by blending MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) and ETM+ (Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus) data. The blended data exhibited a high correlation (R2 = 0.88) with the satellite derived ETM+ data. The time-series NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) data were then generated using the blended high spatio-temporal resolution data to capture the phenological differences between the C3 and C4 vegetation. The time-series NDVI revealed that the C3 vegetation turns green earlier in spring than the C4 vegetation, and senesces later in autumn than the C4 vegetation. C4 vegetation has a higher NDVI value than the C3 vegetation during summer time. Based on the distinguished characteristics, the time-series NDVI was used to extract the C3 and C4 classification features. Five features were selected from the 18 classification features according to the ground investigation data, and subsequently used for the C3 and C4 classification. The overall accuracy of the C3 and C4 vegetation classification was 85.75% with a kappa of 0.725 in our study area

Discrimination and biomass estimation of co-existing C3 and C4 grass functional types over time : a view from space.

Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Sciences. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2018.The co-existence of C3 and C4 grass species significantly influence their spatio-temporal variations of biochemical cycling, productivity (i.e. biomass) and role in provision of ecosystem goods and services. Consequently, the discrimination of the two species is critical in understanding their spatial distribution and productivity. Such discrimination is particularly valuable for accounting for their socio-economic and environmental contributions, as well as decisions related to climate change mitigation. Due to the growing popularity of remotely sensed approaches, this study sought to discriminate the two grass species and determine their AGB using new generation sensors. Specifically, the potential of Landsat 8, Sentinel 2 and Worldview 2, with improved sensing characteristics were tested in achieving the above objectives. Generally, the results demonstrate the suitability of the adopted sensors in the discrimination and determination of C3 and C4 AGB using Discriminant Analysis and Sparse Partial Least Squares Regression models. Using multi-date Sentinel 2 data, the study established that winter period (May) was the most suitable for discriminating the two grass species. On the other hand, the winter fall (August) was found to be the least optimal period for the two grass species discrimination. The study also established that the amount of AGB for C3 and C4 were higher in winter and summer, respectively; a variability attributed to elevation and rainfall. The study concludes that Sentinel 2 dataset, although had weaker performance than Worldview 2; it offers a valuable opportunity in understanding the C3 and C4 spatial distribution within a landscape; hence useful in understanding both temporal and multi-temporal distribution of the two grass species. Successful seasonal characterization of C3 and C4 AGB allows for inferences on their contribution to forage availability and fire regimes; therefore, this contributes to the development of well-informed conservation strategies, which can lead to sustainable utilization of rangelands, especially in relation to the changing climate

Discriminating between C3, C4, and Mixed C3/C4 Pasture Grasses of a Grazed Landscape Using Multi-Temporal Sentinel-1a Data

In livestock grazing environments, the knowledge of C3/C4 species composition of a pasture field is invaluable, since such information assists graziers in making decisions around fertilizer application and stocking rates. The general aim of this research was to explore the potential of multi-temporal Sentinel-1 (S1) Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) to discriminate between C3, C4, and mixed-C3/C4 compositions. In this study, three Random Forest (RF) classification models were created using features derived from polarimetric SAR (polSAR) and grey-level co-occurrence textural metrics (glcmTEX). The first RF model involved only polSAR features and produced a prediction accuracy of 68% with a Kappa coefficient of 0.49. The second RF model used glcmTEX features and produced prediction accuracies of 76%, 62%, and 75% for C3, C4, and mixed C3/C4 grasses, respectively. The glcmTEX model achieved an overall prediction accuracy of 73% with a Kappa coefficient of 0.57. The polSAR and glcmTEX features were then combined (COMB model) to improve upon their individual classification performances. The COMB model produced prediction accuracies of 89%, 81%, and 84% for C3, C4, and mixed C3/C4 pasture grasses, and an overall prediction accuracy of 86% with a Kappa coefficient of 0.77. The contribution of the various model features could be attributed to the changes in dominant species between sampling sites through time, not only because of climatic variability but also because of preferential grazing

Spatio-temporal appraisal of water-borne erosion using optical remote sensing and GIS in the Umzintlava catchement (T32E), Eastern Cape, South Africa.

Globally, soil erosion by water is often reported as the worst form of land degradation owing to its adverse effects, cutting across the ecological and socio-economic spectrum. In general, soil erosion negatively affects the soil fertility, effectively rendering the soil unproductive. This poses a serious threat to food security especially in the developing world including South Africa where about 6 million households derive their income from agriculture, and yet more than 70% of the country’s land is subject to erosion of varying intensities. The Eastern Cape in particular is often considered the most hard-hit province in South Africa due to meteorological and geomorphological factors. It is on this premise the present study is aimed at assessing the spatial and temporal patterns of water-borne erosion in the Umzintlava Catchment, Eastern Cape, using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) model together with geospatial technologies, namely Geographic Information System (GIS) and remote sensing. Specific objectives were to: (1) review recent developments on the use of GIS and remote sensing technologies in assessing and deriving soil erosion factors as represented by RUSLE parameters, (2) assess soil erosion vulnerability of the Umzintlava Catchment using geospatial driven RUSLE model, and (3) assess the impact of landuse/landcover (LULC) change dynamics on soil erosion in the study area during the period 1989-2017. To gain an understanding of recent developments including related successes and challenges on the use of geospatial technologies in deriving individual RUSLE parameters, extensive literature survey was conducted. An integrative methodology, spatially combining the RUSLE model with Systeme Pour l’Obsevation de la Terre (SPOT7) imagery within a digital GIS environment was used to generate relevant information on erosion vulnerability of the Umzintlava Catchment. The results indicated that the catchment suffered from unprecedented rates of soil loss during the study period recording the mean annual soil loss as high as 11 752 t ha−1yr−1. Topography as represented by the LS-factor was the most sensitive parameter to soil loss occurring in hillslopes, whereas in gully-dominated areas, soil type (K-factor) was the overriding factor. In an attempt to understand the impact of LULC change dynamics on soil erosion in the Umzintlava Catchment from the period 1989-2017 (28 years), multi-temporal Landsat data together with RUSLE was used. A post-classification change detection comparison showed that water bodies, agriculture, and grassland decreased by 0.038%, 1.796%, and 13.417%, respectively, whereas areas covered by forest, badlands, and bare soil and built-up area increased by 3.733%, 1.778%, and 9.741% respectively, during the study period. The mean annual soil loss declined from 1027.36 t ha−1yr−1 in 1989 to 138.71 t ha−1yr−1 in 2017. Though soil loss decreased during the observed period, there were however apparent indications of consistent increase in soil loss intensity (risk), most notably, in the elevated parts of the catchment. The proportion of the catchment area with high (25 – 60 t ha−1yr−1) to extremely high (>150 t ha−1yr−1) soil loss risk increased from 0.006% in 1989 to 0.362% in 2017. Further analysis of soil loss results by different LULC classes revealed that some LULC classes, i.e. bare soil and built-up area, agriculture, grassland, and forest, experienced increased soil loss rates during the 28 years study period. Overall, the study concluded that the methodology integrating the RUSLE model with GIS and remote sensing is not only accurate and time-efficient in identifying erosion prone areas in both spatial and temporal terms, but is also a cost-effective alternative to traditional field-based methods. Although successful, few issues were encountered in this study. The estimated soil loss rates in Chapter 3 are above tolerable limits, whereas in Chapter 4, soil loss rates are within tolerable limits. The discrepancy in these results could be explained by the differences in the spatial resolution of SPOT (5m * 5m) and Landsat (30m * 30m) images used in chapters 3 and 4, respectively. Further research should therefore investigate the impact of spatial resolution on RUSLE-estimated soil loss in which case optical sensors including Landsat, Sentinel, and SPOT images may be compared

ESA - RESGROW: Epansion of the Market for EO Based Information Services in Renewable Energy - Biomass Energy sector

Biomass energy is of growing importance as it is widely recognised, both scientifically and politically, that the increase of atmospheric CO2 has led to an enhanced efficiency of the greenhouse effect and, as such, warrants concern for climate change. It is accepted (IPCC 2011 and just recently in the draft version of the IPCC 2013 report) that climate change is partly induced by humans notably by using fossil fuels. For reducing the use of oil or coal, biomass energy is receiving more and more attention as an additional energy source available regionally in large parts of the world. Effective management of renewable energy resources is critical for the European and the global energy supply system. The future contribution of bioenergy to the energy supply strongly depends on its availability, in other words the biomass potential. Biomass potentials are currently mainly assessed on a national to regional or on a global level, with the bulk biomass potential allocated to the whole country. With certain biomass fractions being of low energy density, transport distances and thus their spatial distribution are crucial economic and ecological factors. For other biomass fractions a super-regional or global market is envisaged. Thus spatial information on biomass potentials is vital for the further expansion of bioenergy use. This study, which is an updated version of a study carried out in 2007 in frame of the ENVISOLAR project, analyses the potential use of Earth Observation data as input for biomass models in order to assessment and manage of the biomass energy resources especially biomass potentials of agricultural and forest areas with high spatial resolution (typical 1km x 1km). In addition to a sorrow review of recent developments in data availability and approaches in comparison to its 2007’ version, this study also includes a review on approaches to directly correlate remote sensing data with biomass estimations. An overview of existing biomass models is given covering models using remote sensing data as input as well as models using only meteorological and/or management data as input. It covers the full life cycle from the planning stage to plant management and operations (Figure 1). Several groups of stakeholders were identified

Application of remote sensing and GIS in modelling bison carrying capacity in mixed-grass prairie

Understanding carrying capacity of plains bison (B. bison bison) is critical for protecting this wild species and grassland ecosystem in mixed-grass prairie. The overall goal of this study is to examine plains bison carrying capacity in the mixed-grass prairie. There are four specific objectives: 1) investigate annual space use of plains bison and their seasonal core ranges, 2) assess seasonal Resources Selection Functions (RSFs) of plains bison, 3) estimate vegetation biomass and productivity of mixed-grass prairie, and 4) estimate carrying capacity taking into account RSFs. I used Kernel Density Estimator to address the first objective. Generalized Linear Mixed Effects models were used for the second objective. The last two objectives were completed using Sentinel-2 Multispectral Image (MSI). This study highlights the power of remote sensing and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) techniques in estimating key driver of bison carrying capacity (available forage) and adjusting factor (RSFs). Results show that bison family groups in Grasslands National Park frequent specific areas. They mainly use the northeast corner of the West Block and expand the core range when it comes to dormant season. Vegetation type information and other landscape factors (slope, distance to water, roads, fences, and prairie dog town) are influencing seasonal RSFs of bison family groups. Vegetation productivity is 734 kg ha-1 supporting 671 - 959 Bison Unit as the carrying capacity. Our study not only contributes to a better bison management plan for Grasslands National Park, one of seven conservation areas of wild plains bison in Canada, but also assists in understanding the interaction of this wild species with the mixed-grass prairie ecosystem

Advancing agricultural monitoring for improved yield estimations using SPOT-VGT and PROBA-V type remote sensing data

Accurate and timely crop condition monitoring is crucial for food management and the economic development of any nation. However, accurately estimating crop yield from the field to global scales is a challenge. According to the global strategy of the World Bank, in order to improve national agricultural statistics, crop area, crop production, and crop yield are key variables that all countries should be able to provide. Crop yield assessment requires that both an estimation of the quantity of a product and the area provided for that product should be available. The definition seems simple; however, these measurements are time consuming and subject to error in many circumstances. Remote sensing is one of several methods used for crop yield estimation. The yield results from a combination of environmental factors, such as soil, weather, and farm management, which are responsible for the unique spectral signature of a crop captured by satellite images. Additionally, yield is an expression of the state, structure, and composition of the plant. Various indices, crop masks, and land observation sensors have been developed to remotely observe and control crops in different regions. This thesis focuses on how much low spatial resolution satellites, such as Project for On Board Autonomy Vegetation (PROBA V), can contribute to global crop monitoring by aiding the search for improved methods and datasets for better crop yield estimation. This thesis contains three chapters. The first chapter explores how an existing product, Dry Matter Productivity (DMP), that has been developed for Satellites Pour l’Observation de la Terre or Earth observing Satellites VeGeTation (SPOT VGT), and transferred to PROBA V, can be improved to more closely relate to yield anomalies across selected regions. This chapter also covers the testing of the contribution of stress factors to improve wheat and maize yield estimations. According to Monteith’s theory, crop biomass linearly correlates with the amount of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (APAR) and constant Radiation Use Efficiency (RUE) downregulated by stress factors such as CO2, fertilization, temperature, and water stress. The objective of this chapter is to investigate the relative importance of these stress factors in relation to the regional biomass production and yield. The production efficiency model Copernicus Global Land Service Dry Matter Productivity (CGLS DMP), which follows Monteith’s theory, is modified and evaluated for common wheat and silage maize in France, Belgium, and Morocco using SPOT VGT for the 1999–2012 period. The correlations between the crop yield data and the cumulative modified DMP, CGLS DMP, Fraction of APAR (fAPAR), and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) values are analyzed for different crop growth stages. The best results are obtained when combinations of the most appropriate stress factors are included for each selected region, and the modified DMP during the reproductive stage is accumulated. Though no single solution can demonstrate an improvement of the global product, the findings support an extension of the methodology to other regions of the world. The second chapter demonstrates how PROBA V can be used effectively for crop identification mapping by utilizing spectral matching techniques and phenological characteristics of different crop types. The study sites are agricultural areas spread across the globe, located in Flanders (Belgium), Sria (Russia), Kyiv (Ukraine), and Sao Paulo (Brazil). The data are collected for the 2014–2015 season. For each pure pixel within a field, the NDVI profile of the crop type for its growing season is matched with the reference NDVI profile. Three temporal windows are tested within the growing season: green up to senescence, green up to dormancy, and minimum NDVI at the beginning of the growing season to minimum NDVI at the end of the growing season. In order of importance, the crop phenological development period, parcel size, shorter time window, number of ground truth parcels, and crop calendar similarity are the main reasons behind the differences between the results. The methodology described in this chapter demonstrates the potentials and limitations of using 100 m PROBA V with revisiting frequency every 5 days in crop identification across different regions of the world. The final chapter explores the trade off between the different spatial resolutions provided by PROBA V products versus the temporal frequency and, additionally, explores the use of thermal time to improve statistical yield estimations. The ground data are winter wheat yields at the field level for 39 fields across Northern France during one growing season 2014–2015. An asymmetric double sigmoid function is fitted, and the NDVI values are integrated over thermal time and over calendar time for the central pixel of the field, exploring different thresholds to mark the start and end of the cropping season. The integrated NDVI values with different NDVI thresholds are used as a proxy for yield. In addition, a pixel purity analysis is performed for different purity thresholds at the 100 m, 300 m, and 1 km resolutions. The findings demonstrate that while estimating winter wheat yields at the field level with pure pixels from PROBA V products, the best correlation is obtained with a 100 m resolution product. However, several fields must be omitted due to the lack of observations throughout the growing season with the 100 m resolution dataset, as this product has a lower temporal resolution compared to 300 m and 1 km. This thesis is a modest contribution to the remote sensing and data analysis field with its own merits, in particular with respect to PROBA V. The experiments provide interesting insight into the PROBA V dataset at 1 km, 300 m, and 100 m resolutions. Specifically, the results show that 100 m spatial resolution imagery could be used effectively and advantageously in agricultural crop monitoring and crop identification at local – field level – and regional – the administrative regions defined by the national governments – levels. Furthermore, this thesis discusses the limitations of using a low resolution satellite, such as the PROBA V 100 m dataset, in crop monitoring and identification. Also, several recommendations are made for space agencies that can be used when designing the new generation of satellites