346 research outputs found
Efficient Quantum Tensor Product Expanders and k-designs
Quantum expanders are a quantum analogue of expanders, and k-tensor product
expanders are a generalisation to graphs that randomise k correlated walkers.
Here we give an efficient construction of constant-degree, constant-gap quantum
k-tensor product expanders. The key ingredients are an efficient classical
tensor product expander and the quantum Fourier transform. Our construction
works whenever k=O(n/log n), where n is the number of qubits. An immediate
corollary of this result is an efficient construction of an approximate unitary
k-design, which is a quantum analogue of an approximate k-wise independent
function, on n qubits for any k=O(n/log n). Previously, no efficient
constructions were known for k>2, while state designs, of which unitary designs
are a generalisation, were constructed efficiently in [Ambainis, Emerson 2007].Comment: 16 pages, typo in references fixe
Quantum expanders and growth of group representations
Let be a finite dimensional unitary representation of a group with
a generating symmetric -element set . Fix \vp>0. Assume that
the spectrum of is
included in [-1, 1-\vp] (so there is a spectral gap \ge \vp). Let
be the number of distinct irreducible representations of dimension
that appear in . Then let R_{n,\vp}'(N)=\sup r'_N(\pi) where the
supremum runs over all with {n,\vp} fixed. We prove that there are
positive constants \delta_\vp and c_\vp such that, for all sufficiently
large integer (i.e. with depending on \vp) and for all
, we have \exp{\delta_\vp nN^2} \le R'_{n,\vp}(N)\le \exp{c_\vp
nN^2}. The same bounds hold if, in , we count only the number of
distinct irreducible representations of dimension exactly .Comment: Main addition: A remark due to Martin Kassabov showing that the
numbers R(N) grow faster than polynomial. v3: Minor clarification
Quantum Locally Testable Codes
We initiate the study of quantum Locally Testable Codes (qLTCs). We provide a
definition together with a simplification, denoted sLTCs, for the special case
of stabilizer codes, together with some basic results using those definitions.
The most crucial parameter of such codes is their soundness, ,
namely, the probability that a randomly chosen constraint is violated as a
function of the distance of a word from the code (, the relative
distance from the code, is called the proximity). We then proceed to study
limitations on qLTCs. In our first main result we prove a surprising,
inherently quantum, property of sLTCs: for small values of proximity, the
better the small-set expansion of the interaction graph of the constraints, the
less sound the qLTC becomes. This phenomenon, which can be attributed to
monogamy of entanglement, stands in sharp contrast to the classical setting.
The complementary, more intuitive, result also holds: an upper bound on the
soundness when the code is defined on poor small-set expanders (a bound which
turns out to be far more difficult to show in the quantum case). Together we
arrive at a quantum upper-bound on the soundness of stabilizer qLTCs set on any
graph, which does not hold in the classical case. Many open questions are
raised regarding what possible parameters are achievable for qLTCs. In the
appendix we also define a quantum analogue of PCPs of proximity (PCPPs) and
point out that the result of Ben-Sasson et. al. by which PCPPs imply LTCs with
related parameters, carries over to the sLTCs. This creates a first link
between qLTCs and quantum PCPs.Comment: Some of the results presented here appeared in an initial form in our
quant-ph submission arXiv:1301.3407. This is a much extended and improved
version. 30 pages, no figure
The Quantum PCP Conjecture
The classical PCP theorem is arguably the most important achievement of
classical complexity theory in the past quarter century. In recent years,
researchers in quantum computational complexity have tried to identify
approaches and develop tools that address the question: does a quantum version
of the PCP theorem hold? The story of this study starts with classical
complexity and takes unexpected turns providing fascinating vistas on the
foundations of quantum mechanics, the global nature of entanglement and its
topological properties, quantum error correction, information theory, and much
more; it raises questions that touch upon some of the most fundamental issues
at the heart of our understanding of quantum mechanics. At this point, the jury
is still out as to whether or not such a theorem holds. This survey aims to
provide a snapshot of the status in this ongoing story, tailored to a general
theory-of-CS audience.Comment: 45 pages, 4 figures, an enhanced version of the SIGACT guest column
from Volume 44 Issue 2, June 201
- β¦