145 research outputs found
Choosing a variable ordering for truth-table invariant cylindrical algebraic decomposition by incremental triangular decomposition
Cylindrical algebraic decomposition (CAD) is a key tool for solving problems
in real algebraic geometry and beyond. In recent years a new approach has been
developed, where regular chains technology is used to first build a
decomposition in complex space. We consider the latest variant of this which
builds the complex decomposition incrementally by polynomial and produces CADs
on whose cells a sequence of formulae are truth-invariant. Like all CAD
algorithms the user must provide a variable ordering which can have a profound
impact on the tractability of a problem. We evaluate existing heuristics to
help with the choice for this algorithm, suggest improvements and then derive a
new heuristic more closely aligned with the mechanics of the new algorithm
Formulating problems for real algebraic geometry
We discuss issues of problem formulation for algorithms in real algebraic
geometry, focussing on quantifier elimination by cylindrical algebraic
decomposition. We recall how the variable ordering used can have a profound
effect on both performance and output and summarise what may be done to assist
with this choice. We then survey other questions of problem formulation and
algorithm optimisation that have become pertinent following advances in CAD
theory, including both work that is already published and work that is
currently underway. With implementations now in reach of real world
applications and new theory meaning algorithms are far more sensitive to the
input, our thesis is that intelligently formulating problems for algorithms,
and indeed choosing the correct algorithm variant for a problem, is key to
improving the practical use of both quantifier elimination and symbolic real
algebraic geometry in general.Comment: To be presented at The "Encuentros de \'Algebra Computacional y
Aplicaciones, EACA 2014" (Meetings on Computer Algebra and Applications) in
Barcelon
Truth Table Invariant Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition by Regular Chains
A new algorithm to compute cylindrical algebraic decompositions (CADs) is
presented, building on two recent advances. Firstly, the output is truth table
invariant (a TTICAD) meaning given formulae have constant truth value on each
cell of the decomposition. Secondly, the computation uses regular chains theory
to first build a cylindrical decomposition of complex space (CCD) incrementally
by polynomial. Significant modification of the regular chains technology was
used to achieve the more sophisticated invariance criteria. Experimental
results on an implementation in the RegularChains Library for Maple verify that
combining these advances gives an algorithm superior to its individual
components and competitive with the state of the art
Need Polynomial Systems Be Doubly-Exponential?
Polynomial Systems, or at least their algorithms, have the reputation of
being doubly-exponential in the number of variables [Mayr and Mayer, 1982],
[Davenport and Heintz, 1988]. Nevertheless, the Bezout bound tells us that that
number of zeros of a zero-dimensional system is singly-exponential in the
number of variables. How should this contradiction be reconciled?
We first note that [Mayr and Ritscher, 2013] shows that the doubly
exponential nature of Gr\"{o}bner bases is with respect to the dimension of the
ideal, not the number of variables. This inspires us to consider what can be
done for Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition which produces a
doubly-exponential number of polynomials of doubly-exponential degree.
We review work from ISSAC 2015 which showed the number of polynomials could
be restricted to doubly-exponential in the (complex) dimension using McCallum's
theory of reduced projection in the presence of equational constraints. We then
discuss preliminary results showing the same for the degree of those
polynomials. The results are under primitivity assumptions whose importance we
illustrate.Comment: Extended Abstract for ICMS 2016 Presentation. arXiv admin note: text
overlap with arXiv:1605.0249
Truth table invariant cylindrical algebraic decomposition
When using cylindrical algebraic decomposition (CAD) to solve a problem with
respect to a set of polynomials, it is likely not the signs of those
polynomials that are of paramount importance but rather the truth values of
certain quantifier free formulae involving them. This observation motivates our
article and definition of a Truth Table Invariant CAD (TTICAD).
In ISSAC 2013 the current authors presented an algorithm that can efficiently
and directly construct a TTICAD for a list of formulae in which each has an
equational constraint. This was achieved by generalising McCallum's theory of
reduced projection operators. In this paper we present an extended version of
our theory which can be applied to an arbitrary list of formulae, achieving
savings if at least one has an equational constraint. We also explain how the
theory of reduced projection operators can allow for further improvements to
the lifting phase of CAD algorithms, even in the context of a single equational
constraint.
The algorithm is implemented fully in Maple and we present both promising
results from experimentation and a complexity analysis showing the benefits of
our contributions.Comment: 40 page
Problem formulation for truth-table invariant cylindrical algebraic decomposition by incremental triangular decomposition
Cylindrical algebraic decompositions (CADs) are a key tool for solving problems in real algebraic geometry and beyond. We recently presented a new CAD algorithm combining two advances: truth-table invariance, making the CAD invariant with respect to the truth of logical formulae rather than the signs of polynomials; and CAD construction by regular chains technology, where first a complex decomposition is constructed by refining a tree incrementally by constraint. We here consider how best to formulate problems for input to this algorithm. We focus on a choice (not relevant for other CAD algorithms) about the order in which constraints are presented. We develop new heuristics to help make this choice and thus allow the best use of the algorithm in practice. We also consider other choices of problem formulation for CAD, as discussed in CICM 2013, revisiting these in the context of the new algorithm
Cylindrical algebraic decomposition with equational constraints
Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition (CAD) has long been one of the most
important algorithms within Symbolic Computation, as a tool to perform
quantifier elimination in first order logic over the reals. More recently it is
finding prominence in the Satisfiability Checking community as a tool to
identify satisfying solutions of problems in nonlinear real arithmetic.
The original algorithm produces decompositions according to the signs of
polynomials, when what is usually required is a decomposition according to the
truth of a formula containing those polynomials. One approach to achieve that
coarser (but hopefully cheaper) decomposition is to reduce the polynomials
identified in the CAD to reflect a logical structure which reduces the solution
space dimension: the presence of Equational Constraints (ECs).
This paper may act as a tutorial for the use of CAD with ECs: we describe all
necessary background and the current state of the art. In particular, we
present recent work on how McCallum's theory of reduced projection may be
leveraged to make further savings in the lifting phase: both to the polynomials
we lift with and the cells lifted over. We give a new complexity analysis to
demonstrate that the double exponent in the worst case complexity bound for CAD
reduces in line with the number of ECs. We show that the reduction can apply to
both the number of polynomials produced and their degree.Comment: Accepted into the Journal of Symbolic Computation. arXiv admin note:
text overlap with arXiv:1501.0446
- …