Evolutionary stability of behavioural types in the continuous double auction

In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of different types of bidding behaviour for trading agents in the Continuous Double Auction (CDA). Specifically, we consider behavioural types that are neutral (expected profit maximising), passive (targeting a higher profit than neutral) and aggressive (trading off profit for a better chance of transacting). For these types, we employ an evolutionary game-theoretic analysis to determine the population dynamics of agents that use them in different types of environments, including dynamic ones with market shocks. From this analysis, we find that given a symmetric demand and supply, agents are most likely to adopt neutral behaviour in static environments, while there tends to be more passive than neutral agents in dynamic ones. Furthermore, when we have asymmetric demand and supply, agents invariably adopt passive behaviour in both static and dynamic environments, though the gain in so doing is considerably smaller than in the symmetric case

Equilibrium in Labor Markets with Few Firms

We study competition between firms in labor markets, following a combinatorial model suggested by Kelso and Crawford [1982]. In this model, each firm is trying to recruit workers by offering a higher salary than its competitors, and its production function defines the utility generated from any actual set of recruited workers. We define two natural classes of production functions for firms, where the first one is based on additive capacities (weights), and the second on the influence of workers in a social network. We then analyze the existence of pure subgame perfect equilibrium (PSPE) in the labor market and its properties. While neither class holds the gross substitutes condition, we show that in both classes the existence of PSPE is guaranteed under certain restrictions, and in particular when there are only two competing firms. As a corollary, there exists a Walrasian equilibrium in a corresponding combinatorial auction, where bidders' valuation functions belong to these classes. While a PSPE may not exist when there are more than two firms, we perform an empirical study of equilibrium outcomes for the case of weight-based games with three firms, which extend our analytical results. We then show that stability can in some cases be extended to coalitional stability, and study the distribution of profit between firms and their workers in weight-based games

Approximate Analysis of Large Simulation-Based Games.

Game theory offers powerful tools for reasoning about agent behavior and incentives in multi-agent systems. Traditional approaches to game-theoretic analysis require enumeration of all possible strategies and outcomes. This often constrains game models to small numbers of agents and strategies or simple closed-form payoff descriptions. Simulation-based game theory extends the reach of game-theoretic analysis through the use of agent-based modeling. In the simulation-based approach, the analyst describes an environment procedurally and then computes payoffs by simulation of agent interactions in that environment. I use simulation-based game theory to study a model of credit network formation. Credit networks represent trust relationships in a directed graph and have been proposed as a mechanism for distributed transactions without a central currency. I explore what information is important when agents make initial decisions of whom to trust, and what sorts of networks can result from their decisions. This setting demonstrates both the value of simulation-based game theory—extending game-theoretic analysis beyond analytically tractable models—and its limitations—simulations produce prodigious amounts of data, and the number of simulations grows exponentially in the number of agents and strategies. I propose several techniques for approximate analysis of simulation-based games with large numbers of agents and large amounts of simulation data. First, I show how bootstrap-based statistics can be used to estimate confidence bounds on the results of simulation-based game analysis. I show that bootstrap confidence intervals for regret of approximate equilibria are well-calibrated. Next, I describe deviation-preserving reduction, which approximates an environment with a large number of agents using a game model with a small number of players, and demonstrate that it outperforms previous player reductions on several measures. Finally, I employ machine learning to construct game models from sparse data sets, and provide evidence that learned game models can produce even better approximate equilibria in large games than deviation-preserving reduction.PhDComputer Science and EngineeringUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113587/1/btwied_1.pd