Model Checking Well-Behaved Fragments of HS: The (Almost) Final Picture

Model checking is one of the most powerful and widespread tools for system verification with applications in many areas of computer science and artificial intelligence. The large majority of model checkers deal with properties expressed in point-based temporal logics, such as LTL and CTL. However, there exist relevant properties of systems which are inherently interval-based. Model checking algorithms for interval temporal logics (ITLs) have recently been proposed to check interval properties of computations. As the model checking problem for full Halpern and Shoham\u2019s ITL (HS for short) turns out to be decidable, but computationally heavy, research has focused on its well-behaved fragments. In this paper, we provide an almost final picture of the computational complexity of model checking for HS fragments with modalities for (a subset of) Allen\u2019s relations meets, met by, starts, and end

Formal Proofs for Nonlinear Optimization

We present a formally verified global optimization framework. Given a semialgebraic or transcendental function $f$ and a compact semialgebraic domain $K$, we use the nonlinear maxplus template approximation algorithm to provide a certified lower bound of $f$ over $K$. This method allows to bound in a modular way some of the constituents of $f$ by suprema of quadratic forms with a well chosen curvature. Thus, we reduce the initial goal to a hierarchy of semialgebraic optimization problems, solved by sums of squares relaxations. Our implementation tool interleaves semialgebraic approximations with sums of squares witnesses to form certificates. It is interfaced with Coq and thus benefits from the trusted arithmetic available inside the proof assistant. This feature is used to produce, from the certificates, both valid underestimators and lower bounds for each approximated constituent. The application range for such a tool is widespread; for instance Hales' proof of Kepler's conjecture yields thousands of multivariate transcendental inequalities. We illustrate the performance of our formal framework on some of these inequalities as well as on examples from the global optimization literature.Comment: 24 pages, 2 figures, 3 table

Complexity of ITL model checking: some well-behaved fragments of the interval logic HS

Model checking has been successfully used in many computer science fields, including artificial intelligence, theoretical computer science, and databases. Most of the proposed solutions make use of classical, point-based temporal logics, while little work has been done in the interval temporal logic setting. Recently, a non-elementary model checking algorithm for Halpern and Shoham's modal logic of time intervals HS over finite Kripke structures (under the homogeneity assumption) and an EXPSPACE model checking procedure for two meaningful fragments of it have been proposed. In this paper, we show that more efficient model checking procedures can be developed for some expressive enough fragments of HS

MTL-Model Checking of One-Clock Parametric Timed Automata is Undecidable

Parametric timed automata extend timed automata (Alur and Dill, 1991) in that they allow the specification of parametric bounds on the clock values. Since their introduction in 1993 by Alur, Henzinger, and Vardi, it is known that the emptiness problem for parametric timed automata with one clock is decidable, whereas it is undecidable if the automaton uses three or more parametric clocks. The problem is open for parametric timed automata with two parametric clocks. Metric temporal logic, MTL for short, is a widely used specification language for real-time systems. MTL-model checking of timed automata is decidable, no matter how many clocks are used in the timed automaton. In this paper, we prove that MTL-model checking for parametric timed automata is undecidable, even if the automaton uses only one clock and one parameter and is deterministic.Comment: In Proceedings SynCoP 2014, arXiv:1403.784

Which Fragments of the Interval Temporal Logic HS are Tractable in Model Checking?

Since the 80s, model checking (MC) has been applied to the automatic verification of hardware/software systems. Point-based temporal logics, such as LTL, CTL, CTL⁎, and the like, are commonly used in MC as the specification language; however, there are some inherently interval-based properties of computations, e.g., temporal aggregations and durations, that cannot be properly dealt with by these logics, as they model a state-by-state evolution of systems. Recently, an MC framework for the verification of interval-based properties of computations, based on Halpern and Shoham's interval temporal logic (HS, for short) and its fragments, has been proposed and systematically investigated. In this paper, we focus on the boundaries that separate tractable and intractable HS fragments in MC. We first prove that MC for the logic BE of Allen's relations started-by and finished-by is provably intractable, being EXPSPACE-hard. Such a lower bound immediately propagates to full HS. Then, in contrast, we show that other noteworthy HS fragments, i.e., the logic AA‾BB‾ (resp., AA‾EE‾) of Allen's relations meets, met-by, starts (resp., finishes), and started-by (resp., finished-by), are well-behaved, and turn out to have the same complexity as LTL (PSPACE-complete). Halfway are the fragments AA‾BB‾E‾ and AA‾EB‾E‾, whose EXPSPACE membership and PSPACE hardness are already known. Here, we give an original proof of EXPSPACE membership, that substantially simplifies the complexity of the constructions previously used for such a result. Contraction techniques—suitably tailored to each HS fragment—are at the heart of our results, enabling us to prove a pair of remarkable small-model propertie

Constraint-based reachability

Iterative imperative programs can be considered as infinite-state systems computing over possibly unbounded domains. Studying reachability in these systems is challenging as it requires to deal with an infinite number of states with standard backward or forward exploration strategies. An approach that we call Constraint-based reachability, is proposed to address reachability problems by exploring program states using a constraint model of the whole program. The keypoint of the approach is to interpret imperative constructions such as conditionals, loops, array and memory manipulations with the fundamental notion of constraint over a computational domain. By combining constraint filtering and abstraction techniques, Constraint-based reachability is able to solve reachability problems which are usually outside the scope of backward or forward exploration strategies. This paper proposes an interpretation of classical filtering consistencies used in Constraint Programming as abstract domain computations, and shows how this approach can be used to produce a constraint solver that efficiently generates solutions for reachability problems that are unsolvable by other approaches.Comment: In Proceedings Infinity 2012, arXiv:1302.310