54 research outputs found

    Uniform test of algorithmic randomness over a general space

    Get PDF
    The algorithmic theory of randomness is well developed when the underlying space is the set of finite or infinite sequences and the underlying probability distribution is the uniform distribution or a computable distribution. These restrictions seem artificial. Some progress has been made to extend the theory to arbitrary Bernoulli distributions (by Martin-Loef), and to arbitrary distributions (by Levin). We recall the main ideas and problems of Levin's theory, and report further progress in the same framework. - We allow non-compact spaces (like the space of continuous functions, underlying the Brownian motion). - The uniform test (deficiency of randomness) d_P(x) (depending both on the outcome x and the measure P should be defined in a general and natural way. - We see which of the old results survive: existence of universal tests, conservation of randomness, expression of tests in terms of description complexity, existence of a universal measure, expression of mutual information as "deficiency of independence. - The negative of the new randomness test is shown to be a generalization of complexity in continuous spaces; we show that the addition theorem survives. The paper's main contribution is introducing an appropriate framework for studying these questions and related ones (like statistics for a general family of distributions).Comment: 40 pages. Journal reference and a slight correction in the proof of Theorem 7 adde

    A constructive version of Birkhoff's ergodic theorem for Martin-L\"of random points

    Get PDF
    A theorem of Ku\v{c}era states that given a Martin-L\"of random infinite binary sequence {\omega} and an effectively open set A of measure less than 1, some tail of {\omega} is not in A. We first prove several results in the same spirit and generalize them via an effective version of a weak form of Birkhoff's ergodic theorem. We then use this result to get a stronger form of it, namely a very general effective version of Birkhoff's ergodic theorem, which improves all the results previously obtained in this direction, in particular those of V'Yugin, Nandakumar and Hoyrup, Rojas.Comment: Improved version of the CiE'10 paper, with the strong form of Birkhoff's ergodic theorem for random point

    Random semicomputable reals revisited

    Full text link
    The aim of this expository paper is to present a nice series of results, obtained in the papers of Chaitin (1976), Solovay (1975), Calude et al. (1998), Kucera and Slaman (2001). This joint effort led to a full characterization of lower semicomputable random reals, both as those that can be expressed as a "Chaitin Omega" and those that are maximal for the Solovay reducibility. The original proofs were somewhat involved; in this paper, we present these results in an elementary way, in particular requiring only basic knowledge of algorithmic randomness. We add also several simple observations relating lower semicomputable random reals and busy beaver functions.Comment: 15 page

    Asymmetry of the Kolmogorov complexity of online predicting odd and even bits

    Get PDF
    Symmetry of information states that C(x)+C(yx)=C(x,y)+O(logC(x))C(x) + C(y|x) = C(x,y) + O(\log C(x)). We show that a similar relation for online Kolmogorov complexity does not hold. Let the even (online Kolmogorov) complexity of an n-bitstring x1x2...xnx_1x_2... x_n be the length of a shortest program that computes x2x_2 on input x1x_1, computes x4x_4 on input x1x2x3x_1x_2x_3, etc; and similar for odd complexity. We show that for all n there exist an n-bit x such that both odd and even complexity are almost as large as the Kolmogorov complexity of the whole string. Moreover, flipping odd and even bits to obtain a sequence x2x1x4x3x_2x_1x_4x_3\ldots, decreases the sum of odd and even complexity to C(x)C(x).Comment: 20 pages, 7 figure

    The Dimensions of Individual Strings and Sequences

    Get PDF
    A constructive version of Hausdorff dimension is developed using constructive supergales, which are betting strategies that generalize the constructive supermartingales used in the theory of individual random sequences. This constructive dimension is used to assign every individual (infinite, binary) sequence S a dimension, which is a real number dim(S) in the interval [0,1]. Sequences that are random (in the sense of Martin-Lof) have dimension 1, while sequences that are decidable, \Sigma^0_1, or \Pi^0_1 have dimension 0. It is shown that for every \Delta^0_2-computable real number \alpha in [0,1] there is a \Delta^0_2 sequence S such that \dim(S) = \alpha. A discrete version of constructive dimension is also developed using termgales, which are supergale-like functions that bet on the terminations of (finite, binary) strings as well as on their successive bits. This discrete dimension is used to assign each individual string w a dimension, which is a nonnegative real number dim(w). The dimension of a sequence is shown to be the limit infimum of the dimensions of its prefixes. The Kolmogorov complexity of a string is proven to be the product of its length and its dimension. This gives a new characterization of algorithmic information and a new proof of Mayordomo's recent theorem stating that the dimension of a sequence is the limit infimum of the average Kolmogorov complexity of its first n bits. Every sequence that is random relative to any computable sequence of coin-toss biases that converge to a real number \beta in (0,1) is shown to have dimension \H(\beta), the binary entropy of \beta.Comment: 31 page

    Relating and contrasting plain and prefix Kolmogorov complexity

    Get PDF
    In [3] a short proof is given that some strings have maximal plain Kolmogorov complexity but not maximal prefix-free complexity. The proof uses Levin's symmetry of information, Levin's formula relating plain and prefix complexity and Gacs' theorem that complexity of complexity given the string can be high. We argue that the proof technique and results mentioned above are useful to simplify existing proofs and to solve open questions. We present a short proof of Solovay's result [21] relating plain and prefix complexity: K(x)=C(x)+CC(x)+O(CCC(x))K (x) = C (x) + CC (x) + O(CCC (x)) and C(x)=K(x)KK(x)+O(KKK(x))C (x) = K (x) - KK (x) + O(KKK (x)), (here CC(x)CC(x) denotes C(C(x))C(C(x)), etc.). We show that there exist ω\omega such that lim infC(ω1ωn)C(n)\liminf C(\omega_1\dots \omega_n) - C(n) is infinite and lim infK(ω1ωn)K(n)\liminf K(\omega_1\dots \omega_n) - K(n) is finite, i.e. the infinitely often C-trivial reals are not the same as the infinitely often K-trivial reals (i.e. [1,Question 1]). Solovay showed that for infinitely many xx we have xC(x)O(1)|x| - C (x) \le O(1) and x+K(x)K(x)log(2)xO(log(3)x)|x| + K (|x|) - K (x) \ge \log^{(2)} |x| - O(\log^{(3)} |x|), (here x|x| denotes the length of xx and log(2)=loglog\log^{(2)} = \log\log, etc.). We show that this result holds for prefixes of some 2-random sequences. Finally, we generalize our proof technique and show that no monotone relation exists between expectation and probability bounded randomness deficiency (i.e. [6, Question 1]).Comment: 20 pages, 1 figur
    corecore