131 research outputs found

    Computational Complexity of Certifying Restricted Isometry Property

    Get PDF
    Given a matrix AA with nn rows, a number k<nk<n, and 0<δ<10<\delta < 1, AA is (k,δ)(k,\delta)-RIP (Restricted Isometry Property) if, for any vector x∈Rnx \in \mathbb{R}^n, with at most kk non-zero co-ordinates, (1−δ)∥x∥2≤∥Ax∥2≤(1+δ)∥x∥2(1-\delta) \|x\|_2 \leq \|A x\|_2 \leq (1+\delta)\|x\|_2 In many applications, such as compressed sensing and sparse recovery, it is desirable to construct RIP matrices with a large kk and a small δ\delta. Given the efficacy of random constructions in generating useful RIP matrices, the problem of certifying the RIP parameters of a matrix has become important. In this paper, we prove that it is hard to approximate the RIP parameters of a matrix assuming the Small-Set-Expansion-Hypothesis. Specifically, we prove that for any arbitrarily large constant C>0C>0 and any arbitrarily small constant 0<δ<10<\delta<1, there exists some kk such that given a matrix MM, it is SSE-Hard to distinguish the following two cases: - (Highly RIP) MM is (k,δ)(k,\delta)-RIP. - (Far away from RIP) MM is not (k/C,1−δ)(k/C, 1-\delta)-RIP. Most of the previous results on the topic of hardness of RIP certification only hold for certification when δ=o(1)\delta=o(1). In practice, it is of interest to understand the complexity of certifying a matrix with δ\delta being close to 2−1\sqrt{2}-1, as it suffices for many real applications to have matrices with δ=2−1\delta = \sqrt{2}-1. Our hardness result holds for any constant δ\delta. Specifically, our result proves that even if δ\delta is indeed very small, i.e. the matrix is in fact \emph{strongly RIP}, certifying that the matrix exhibits \emph{weak RIP} itself is SSE-Hard. In order to prove the hardness result, we prove a variant of the Cheeger's Inequality for sparse vectors
    • …
    corecore