14,104 research outputs found
Topics in social network analysis and network science
This chapter introduces statistical methods used in the analysis of social
networks and in the rapidly evolving parallel-field of network science.
Although several instances of social network analysis in health services
research have appeared recently, the majority involve only the most basic
methods and thus scratch the surface of what might be accomplished.
Cutting-edge methods using relevant examples and illustrations in health
services research are provided
The use of multilayer network analysis in animal behaviour
Network analysis has driven key developments in research on animal behaviour
by providing quantitative methods to study the social structures of animal
groups and populations. A recent formalism, known as \emph{multilayer network
analysis}, has advanced the study of multifaceted networked systems in many
disciplines. It offers novel ways to study and quantify animal behaviour as
connected 'layers' of interactions. In this article, we review common questions
in animal behaviour that can be studied using a multilayer approach, and we
link these questions to specific analyses. We outline the types of behavioural
data and questions that may be suitable to study using multilayer network
analysis. We detail several multilayer methods, which can provide new insights
into questions about animal sociality at individual, group, population, and
evolutionary levels of organisation. We give examples for how to implement
multilayer methods to demonstrate how taking a multilayer approach can alter
inferences about social structure and the positions of individuals within such
a structure. Finally, we discuss caveats to undertaking multilayer network
analysis in the study of animal social networks, and we call attention to
methodological challenges for the application of these approaches. Our aim is
to instigate the study of new questions about animal sociality using the new
toolbox of multilayer network analysis.Comment: Thoroughly revised; title changed slightl
Social Interactions vs Revisions, What is important for Promotion in Wikipedia?
In epistemic community, people are said to be selected on their knowledge
contribution to the project (articles, codes, etc.) However, the socialization
process is an important factor for inclusion, sustainability as a contributor,
and promotion. Finally, what does matter to be promoted? being a good
contributor? being a good animator? knowing the boss? We explore this question
looking at the process of election for administrator in the English Wikipedia
community. We modeled the candidates according to their revisions and/or social
attributes. These attributes are used to construct a predictive model of
promotion success, based on the candidates's past behavior, computed thanks to
a random forest algorithm.
Our model combining knowledge contribution variables and social networking
variables successfully explain 78% of the results which is better than the
former models. It also helps to refine the criterion for election. If the
number of knowledge contributions is the most important element, social
interactions come close second to explain the election. But being connected
with the future peers (the admins) can make the difference between success and
failure, making this epistemic community a very social community too
Educational commitment and social networking: The power of informal networks
The lack of an engaging pedagogy and the highly competitive atmosphere in
introductory science courses tend to discourage students from pursuing science,
technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. Once in a STEM field,
academic and social integration has been long thought to be important for
students' persistence. Yet, it is rarely investigated. In particular, the
relative impact of in-class and out-of-class interactions remains an open
issue. Here, we demonstrate that, surprisingly, for students whose grades fall
in the "middle of the pack," the out-of-class network is the most significant
predictor of persistence. To do so, we use logistic regression combined with
Akaike's information criterion to assess in- and out-of-class networks, grades,
and other factors. For students with grades at the very top (and bottom), final
grade, unsurprisingly, is the best predictor of persistence---these students
are likely already committed (or simply restricted from continuing) so they
persist (or drop out). For intermediate grades, though, only out-of-class
closeness---a measure of one's immersion in the network---helps predict
persistence. This does not negate the need for in-class ties. However, it
suggests that, in this cohort, only students that get past the convenient
in-class interactions and start forming strong bonds outside of class are or
become committed to their studies. Since many students are lost through
attrition, our results suggest practical routes for increasing students'
persistence in STEM majors.Comment: 12 pages, 2 figures, 8 tables, 6 pages of Supplementary Material
Getting Into Networks and Clusters: Evidence on the GNSS composite knowledge process in (and from) Midi-Pyrénées
This paper aims to contribute to the empirical identification of clusters by proposing methodological issues based on network analysis. We start with the detection of a composite knowledge process rather than a territorial one stricto sensu. Such a consideration allows us to avoid the overestimation of the role played by geographical proximity between agents, and grasp its ambivalence in knowledge relations. Networks and clusters correspond to the complex aggregation process of bi or n-lateral relations in which agents can play heterogeneous structural roles. Their empirical reconstitution requires thus to gather located relational data, whereas their structural properties analysis requires to compute a set of indexes developed in the field of the social network analysis. Our theoretical considerations are tested in the technological field of GNSS (Global Satellite Navigation Systems). We propose a sample of knowledge relations based on collaborative R&D projects and discuss how this sample is shaped and why we can assume its representativeness. The network we obtain allows us to show how the composite knowledge process gives rise to a structure with a peculiar combination of local and distant relations. Descriptive statistics and structural properties show the influence or the centrality of certain agents in the aggregate structure, and permit to discuss the complementarities between their heterogeneous knowledge profiles. Quantitative results are completed and confirmed by an interpretative discussion based on a run of semi-structured interviews. Concluding remarks provide theoretical feedbacks.Knowledge, Networks, Economic Geography, Cluster, GNSS
- âŠ