Stratified decision forests for accurate anatomical landmark localization in cardiac images

Accurate localization of anatomical landmarks is an important step in medical imaging, as it provides useful prior information for subsequent image analysis and acquisition methods. It is particularly useful for initialization of automatic image analysis tools (e.g. segmentation and registration) and detection of scan planes for automated image acquisition. Landmark localization has been commonly performed using learning based approaches, such as classifier and/or regressor models. However, trained models may not generalize well in heterogeneous datasets when the images contain large differences due to size, pose and shape variations of organs. To learn more data-adaptive and patient specific models, we propose a novel stratification based training model, and demonstrate its use in a decision forest. The proposed approach does not require any additional training information compared to the standard model training procedure and can be easily integrated into any decision tree framework. The proposed method is evaluated on 1080 3D highresolution and 90 multi-stack 2D cardiac cine MR images. The experiments show that the proposed method achieves state-of-theart landmark localization accuracy and outperforms standard regression and classification based approaches. Additionally, the proposed method is used in a multi-atlas segmentation to create a fully automatic segmentation pipeline, and the results show that it achieves state-of-the-art segmentation accuracy

A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis

Deep learning algorithms, in particular convolutional networks, have rapidly become a methodology of choice for analyzing medical images. This paper reviews the major deep learning concepts pertinent to medical image analysis and summarizes over 300 contributions to the field, most of which appeared in the last year. We survey the use of deep learning for image classification, object detection, segmentation, registration, and other tasks and provide concise overviews of studies per application area. Open challenges and directions for future research are discussed.Comment: Revised survey includes expanded discussion section and reworked introductory section on common deep architectures. Added missed papers from before Feb 1st 201

Deep Learning-based Prescription of Cardiac MRI Planes.

PurposeTo develop and evaluate a system to prescribe imaging planes for cardiac MRI based on deep learning (DL)-based localization of key anatomic landmarks.Materials and methodsAnnotated landmarks on 892 long-axis (LAX) and 493 short-axis (SAX) cine steady-state free precession series from cardiac MR images were retrospectively collected between February 2012 and June 2017. U-Net-based heatmap regression was used for localization of cardiac landmarks, which were used to compute cardiac MRI planes. Performance was evaluated by comparing localization distances and plane angle differences between DL predictions and ground truth. The plane angulations from DL were compared with those prescribed by the technologist at the original time of acquisition. Data were split into 80% for training and 20% for testing, and results confirmed with fivefold cross-validation.ResultsOn LAX images, DL localized the apex within mean 12.56 mm ± 19.11 (standard deviation) and the mitral valve (MV) within 7.68 mm ± 6.91. On SAX images, DL localized the aortic valve within 5.78 mm ± 5.68, MV within 5.90 mm ± 5.24, pulmonary valve within 6.55 mm ± 6.39, and tricuspid valve within 6.39 mm ± 5.89. On the basis of these localizations, average angle bias and mean error of DL-predicted imaging planes relative to ground truth annotations were as follows: SAX, -1.27° ± 6.81 and 4.93° ± 4.86; four chambers, 0.38° ± 6.45 and 5.16° ± 3.80; three chambers, 0.13° ± 12.70 and 9.02° ± 8.83; and two chamber, 0.25° ± 9.08 and 6.53° ± 6.28, respectively.ConclusionDL-based anatomic localization is a feasible strategy for planning cardiac MRI planes. This approach can produce imaging planes comparable to those defined by ground truth landmarks.© RSNA, 2019 Supplemental material is available for this article