3,540 research outputs found

    Experiments on the Node, Edge, and Arc Routing Problem

    Get PDF
    -The Node, Edge, and Arc Routing Problem (NEARP) was defined by Prins and Bouchenoua in 2004 along with the first benchmark called CBMix. The NEARP generalizes the classical Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP), the Capacitated Arc Routing Problem (CARP), and the General Routing Problem. It is also denoted the Mixed Capacitated General Routing Problem (MCGRP). The NEARP removes the strict and unwarranted dichotomy that previously existed in the literature between arc routing and node routing. In real applications, there are many cases where the pure node or arc routing models are not adequate. In fundamentally node-based routing applications such as newspaper delivery and communal waste management that have typically been modeled as arc routing problems in the literature, the number of points is often so large that demand aggregation is necessary. Aggregation heuristics will normally give a NEARP instance, possibly with side constraints. Hence, the NEARP is a scientifically challenging problem with high industrial relevance. In this report we present experiments with Spider, SINTEF’s industrial VRP solver, on the three NEARP benchmarks that have been published so far: CBMix, BHW, and DI-NEARP. Bach, Hasle, and Wþhlk have developed a combinatorial lower bound for the NEARP and defined the two latter benchmarks. Here, we present an experimental study with Spider on the three existing NEARP benchmarks. Upper and lower bounds are given for all instances. Three of the BHW instances have been solved to optimality. SINTEF has developed a web page for NEARP results on http://www.sintef.no/NEARP

    Experiments on the Node, Edge, and Arc Routing Problem

    Get PDF
    The Node, Edge, and Arc Routing Problem (NEARP) was defined by Prins and Bouchenoua in 2004 along with the first benchmark called CBMix. The NEARP generalizes the classical Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP), the Capacitated Arc Routing Problem (CARP), and the General Routing Problem. It is also denoted the Mixed Capacitated General Routing Problem (MCGRP). The NEARP removes the strict and unwarranted dichotomy that previously existed in the literature between arc routing and node routing. In real applications, there are many cases where the pure node or arc routing models are not adequate. In fundamentally node-based routing applications such as newspaper delivery and communal waste management that have typically been modeled as arc routing problems in the literature, the number of points is often so large that demand aggregation is necessary. Aggregation heuristics will normally give a NEARP instance, possibly with side constraints. Hence, the NEARP is a scientifically challenging problem with high industrial relevance. In this report we present experiments with Spider, SINTEF’s industrial VRP solver, on the three NEARP benchmarks that have been published so far: CBMix, BHW, and DI-NEARP. Bach, Hasle, and Wþhlk have developed a combinatorial lower bound for the NEARP and defined the two latter benchmarks. Here, we present an experimental study with Spider on the three existing NEARP benchmarks. Upper and lower bounds are given for all instances. Three of the BHW instances have been solved to optimality. SINTEF has developed a web page for NEARP results on http://www.sintef.no/NEARP

    An updated annotated bibliography on arc routing problems

    Get PDF
    The number of arc routing publications has increased significantly in the last decade. Such an increase justifies a second annotated bibliography, a sequel to Corberán and Prins (Networks 56 (2010), 50–69), discussing arc routing studies from 2010 onwards. These studies are grouped into three main sections: single vehicle problems, multiple vehicle problems and applications. Each main section catalogs problems according to their specifics. Section 2 is therefore composed of four subsections, namely: the Chinese Postman Problem, the Rural Postman Problem, the General Routing Problem (GRP) and Arc Routing Problems (ARPs) with profits. Section 3, devoted to the multiple vehicle case, begins with three subsections on the Capacitated Arc Routing Problem (CARP) and then delves into several variants of multiple ARPs, ending with GRPs and problems with profits. Section 4 is devoted to applications, including distribution and collection routes, outdoor activities, post-disaster operations, road cleaning and marking. As new applications emerge and existing applications continue to be used and adapted, the future of arc routing research looks promising.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    Constant-factor approximations for Capacitated Arc Routing without triangle inequality

    Full text link
    Given an undirected graph with edge costs and edge demands, the Capacitated Arc Routing problem (CARP) asks for minimum-cost routes for equal-capacity vehicles so as to satisfy all demands. Constant-factor polynomial-time approximation algorithms were proposed for CARP with triangle inequality, while CARP was claimed to be NP-hard to approximate within any constant factor in general. Correcting this claim, we show that any factor {\alpha} approximation for CARP with triangle inequality yields a factor {\alpha} approximation for the general CARP

    The two-echelon capacitated vehicle routing problem: models and math-based heuristics

    Get PDF
    Multiechelon distribution systems are quite common in supply-chain and logistics. They are used by public administrations in their transportation and traffic planning strategies, as well as by companies, to model own distribution systems. In the literature, most of the studies address issues relating to the movement of flows throughout the system from their origins to their final destinations. Another recent trend is to focus on the management of the vehicle fleets required to provide transportation among different echelons. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, it introduces the family of two-echelon vehicle routing problems (VRPs), a term that broadly covers such settings, where the delivery from one or more depots to customers is managed by routing and consolidating freight through intermediate depots. Second, it considers in detail the basic version of two-echelon VRPs, the two-echelon capacitated VRP, which is an extension of the classical VRP in which the delivery is compulsorily delivered through intermediate depots, named satellites. A mathematical model for two-echelon capacitated VRP, some valid inequalities, and two math-heuristics based on the model are presented. Computational results of up to 50 customers and four satellites show the effectiveness of the methods developed

    Lower bounds for the mixed capacitated arc routing problem

    Get PDF
    Capacitated arc routing problems (CARP) arise in distribution or collecting problems where activities are performed by vehicles, with limited capacity, and are continuously distributed along some pre-defined links of a network. The CARP is defined either as an undirected problem or as a directed problem depending on whether the required links are undirected or directed. The mixed capacitated arc routing problem (MCARP) models a more realistic scenario since it considers directed as well as undirected required links in the associated network. We present a compact flow based model for the MCARP. Due to its large number of variables and constraints, we have created an aggregated version of the original model. Although this model is no longer valid, we show that it provides the same linear programming bound than the original model. Different sets of valid inequalities are also derived. The quality of the models is tested on benchmark instances with quite promising results..info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    On the use of biased-randomized algorithms for solving non-smooth optimization problems

    Get PDF
    Soft constraints are quite common in real-life applications. For example, in freight transportation, the fleet size can be enlarged by outsourcing part of the distribution service and some deliveries to customers can be postponed as well; in inventory management, it is possible to consider stock-outs generated by unexpected demands; and in manufacturing processes and project management, it is frequent that some deadlines cannot be met due to delays in critical steps of the supply chain. However, capacity-, size-, and time-related limitations are included in many optimization problems as hard constraints, while it would be usually more realistic to consider them as soft ones, i.e., they can be violated to some extent by incurring a penalty cost. Most of the times, this penalty cost will be nonlinear and even noncontinuous, which might transform the objective function into a non-smooth one. Despite its many practical applications, non-smooth optimization problems are quite challenging, especially when the underlying optimization problem is NP-hard in nature. In this paper, we propose the use of biased-randomized algorithms as an effective methodology to cope with NP-hard and non-smooth optimization problems in many practical applications. Biased-randomized algorithms extend constructive heuristics by introducing a nonuniform randomization pattern into them. Hence, they can be used to explore promising areas of the solution space without the limitations of gradient-based approaches, which assume the existence of smooth objective functions. Moreover, biased-randomized algorithms can be easily parallelized, thus employing short computing times while exploring a large number of promising regions. This paper discusses these concepts in detail, reviews existing work in different application areas, and highlights current trends and open research lines

    New Models and Methods for Arc Routing

    Get PDF
    The talk presents two non-standard extensions for single-vehicle arc-routing problems a.k.a. postman problems: First, street segments that require a service on both sides of the street can be covered either by two separate services or by a single zigzag service. Instead of deciding the type of service beforehand, we propose to take into account the zigzagging option when designing a tour. We present MIP models for the extension of Undirected Chinese and Rural Postman Problem (UCPP, URPP). We show that these models can be solved reasonable well using a cutting-plane or branch-and-cut algorithm. Second, capacitated postman problems occur as subproblems in column-generation and Lagrangian-relaxation approaches of the capacitated arc-routing problem. In order to model these and similar subproblems or submodels, we present the Profitable Capacitated Rural Postman Problem (PCRPP): In the PCRPP, edges that are serviced give a profit, but deadheading through edges generates costs. Both service and deadheading consume time. The task is to find a tour that maximizes the difference of profits and costs, while the overall duration of the tour must not exceed a given bound. The solution approach for this problem is again based on branch-and-cut
    • 

    corecore