Improving the Performance and Energy Efficiency of GPGPU Computing through Adaptive Cache and Memory Management Techniques

Department of Computer Science and EngineeringAs the performance and energy efficiency requirement of GPGPUs have risen, memory management techniques of GPGPUs have improved to meet the requirements by employing hardware caches and utilizing heterogeneous memory. These techniques can improve GPGPUs by providing lower latency and higher bandwidth of the memory. However, these methods do not always guarantee improved performance and energy efficiency due to the small cache size and heterogeneity of the memory nodes. While prior works have proposed various techniques to address this issue, relatively little work has been done to investigate holistic support for memory management techniques. In this dissertation, we analyze performance pathologies and propose various techniques to improve memory management techniques. First, we investigate the effectiveness of advanced cache indexing (ACI) for high-performance and energy-efficient GPGPU computing. Specifically, we discuss the designs of various static and adaptive cache indexing schemes and present implementation for GPGPUs. We then quantify and analyze the effectiveness of the ACI schemes based on a cycle-accurate GPGPU simulator. Our quantitative evaluation shows that ACI schemes achieve significant performance and energy-efficiency gains over baseline conventional indexing scheme. We also analyze the performance sensitivity of ACI to key architectural parameters (i.e., capacity, associativity, and ICN bandwidth) and the cache indexing latency. We also demonstrate that ACI continues to achieve high performance in various settings. Second, we propose IACM, integrated adaptive cache management for high-performance and energy-efficient GPGPU computing. Based on the performance pathology analysis of GPGPUs, we integrate state-of-the-art adaptive cache management techniques (i.e., cache indexing, bypassing, and warp limiting) in a unified architectural framework to eliminate performance pathologies. Our quantitative evaluation demonstrates that IACM significantly improves the performance and energy efficiency of various GPGPU workloads over the baseline architecture (i.e., 98.1% and 61.9% on average, respectively) and achieves considerably higher performance than the state-of-the-art technique (i.e., 361.4% at maximum and 7.7% on average). Furthermore, IACM delivers significant performance and energy efficiency gains over the baseline GPGPU architecture even when enhanced with advanced architectural technologies (e.g., higher capacity, associativity). Third, we propose bandwidth- and latency-aware page placement (BLPP) for GPGPUs with heterogeneous memory. BLPP analyzes the characteristics of a application and determines the optimal page allocation ratio between the GPU and CPU memory. Based on the optimal page allocation ratio, BLPP dynamically allocate pages across the heterogeneous memory nodes. Our experimental results show that BLPP considerably outperforms the baseline and state-of-the-art technique (i.e., 13.4% and 16.7%) and performs similar to the static-best version (i.e., 1.2% difference), which requires extensive offline profiling.clos

Cache Equalizer: A Cache Pressure Aware Block Placement Scheme for Large-Scale Chip Multiprocessors

This paper describes Cache Equalizer (CE), a novel distributed cache management scheme for large scale chip multiprocessors (CMPs). Our work is motivated by large asymmetry in cache sets usages. CE decouples the physical locations of cache blocks from their addresses for the sake of reducing misses caused by destructive interferences. Temporal pressure at the on-chip last-level cache, is continuously collected at a group (comprised of cache sets) granularity, and periodically recorded at the memory controller to guide the placement process. An incoming block is consequently placed at a cache group that exhibits the minimum pressure. CE provides Quality of Service (QoS) by robustly offering better performance than the baseline shared NUCA cache. Simulation results using a full-system simulator demonstrate that CE outperforms shared NUCA caches by an average of 15.5% and by as much as 28.5% for the benchmark programs we examined. Furthermore, evaluations manifested the outperformance of CE versus related CMP cache designs

The Virtual Block Interface: A Flexible Alternative to the Conventional Virtual Memory Framework

Computers continue to diversify with respect to system designs, emerging memory technologies, and application memory demands. Unfortunately, continually adapting the conventional virtual memory framework to each possible system configuration is challenging, and often results in performance loss or requires non-trivial workarounds. To address these challenges, we propose a new virtual memory framework, the Virtual Block Interface (VBI). We design VBI based on the key idea that delegating memory management duties to hardware can reduce the overheads and software complexity associated with virtual memory. VBI introduces a set of variable-sized virtual blocks (VBs) to applications. Each VB is a contiguous region of the globally-visible VBI address space, and an application can allocate each semantically meaningful unit of information (e.g., a data structure) in a separate VB. VBI decouples access protection from memory allocation and address translation. While the OS controls which programs have access to which VBs, dedicated hardware in the memory controller manages the physical memory allocation and address translation of the VBs. This approach enables several architectural optimizations to (1) efficiently and flexibly cater to different and increasingly diverse system configurations, and (2) eliminate key inefficiencies of conventional virtual memory. We demonstrate the benefits of VBI with two important use cases: (1) reducing the overheads of address translation (for both native execution and virtual machine environments), as VBI reduces the number of translation requests and associated memory accesses; and (2) two heterogeneous main memory architectures, where VBI increases the effectiveness of managing fast memory regions. For both cases, VBI significanttly improves performance over conventional virtual memory